Previous Section Index Home Page


24 Feb 2003 : Column 92W—continued

Recycling

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has made of the impact of recent changes to the Landfill Tax Credit Scheme on future waste awareness minimisation activities in England and Wales; and how this will impact on the UK's ability to meet the Landfill Directive targets. [97050]

Mr. Meacher [holding answer 12 February 2003]: Changes to the Landfill Tax Credit Scheme (LTCS), which will introduce a new public expenditure scheme to replace some elements of the current scheme, will allow the Government to target funding better as a means of achieving specific sustainable waste management objectives. Initially, the aim will be to deliver the short to medium term measures set out in the Strategy Unit's report "Waste Not Want Not", to increase waste minimisation; boost recycling; develop new technologies; and improve information and awareness, data and the research base. Increasing performance in these areas, through changes to the LTCS, should improve the UK's capacity to meet its Landfill Directive targets.

Mrs. Browning: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the financial value of annual exports of materials for recycling, with particular reference to (a) green glass, (b) plastic, (c) steel and (d) short fibre from paper mills, was in each of the last three years; and what volume was exported in each case, broken down by destination of export. [96151]

Mr. Meacher [holding answer 6 February 2003]: The Department does not record information on the financial value of exported recyclable materials.

H M Customs and Excise are responsible for export statistics. However the comcodes (this is the level at which traders declarations are made) which cover the materials requested, are not specific enough to uniquely identify them.

Mr. Flook: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the recycling records of local authorities in Somerset. [96497]

Mr. Meacher: We have set all local authorities statutory performance standards (or targets) for recycling for 2003–04 and 2005–06. The latest performance information for authorities in Somerset is given as follows:

24 Feb 2003 : Column 93W

Percentage

Recycling and composting rateStatutory Performance Standard
Authority1998–991999–20002001–022003–042005–06
Bath and North East Somerset Council1721233336
Mendip District Council8771624
North Somerset Council710131421
Sedgemoor District Council6661218
Somerset County Council1413162836
South Somerset District Council1110102233
Taunton Deane Borough Council1210132436
West Somerset District Council89111624


Government have provided extra funding to help authorities meet these standards through successive increases in the EPCS spending block, which includes waste services, and through the National Waste

24 Feb 2003 : Column 94W

Minimisation and Recycling Challenge Fund under which the following Somerset authorities made successful bids.

AuthorityCategory
Round 1
Somerset Waste PartnershipPartnership working between authorities
Bath and North East Somerset CouncilTwo bids under high performance, innovation and best practice
North Somerset CouncilHelp turn around low performance
Round 2
North Somerset CouncilHelp turn around low performance
Sedgemoor District CouncilDeveloping community initiatives
South Somerset District CouncilPartnership working between authorities
Bath and North East Somerset CouncilHigh performance, innovation and best practice


It is too soon to tell whether individual authorities in Somerset or elsewhere, will meet the standards. In September 2002 I wrote to the leaders of 141 councils asking them to let me know how they intend to meet their 2003–04 Statutory Performance Standard for recycling and composting of household waste of which the following four were in Somerset:

Mendip District Council

Sedgemoor District Council

South Somerset District Council

Taunton Deane Borough Council.

Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the recycling records of local authorities in (a) West Sussex and (b) London. [96008]

Mr. Meacher: We have set all local authorities statutory performance standards (or targets) for recycling for 2003–04 and 2005–06. The latest performance information for authorities in London and West Sussex is given as follows:

Percentage

Recycling and composting rateStatutory Performance Standards
Authority1998–991999–20002001–022003–042005–06
London
Barking and Dagenham LB3341018
Barnet LB9881827
Bexley LB1818193336
Brent LB5671018
Bromley LB713131421
Camden LB1113162233
Croydon LB1413122836
Ealing LB1012122030
East London Waste Authority4581018
Enfield LB9991827
Greenwich LB4461018
Hackney LB2211018
Hammersmith and Fulham LB8781624
Haringey LB5561018
Harrow LB810111624
Havering LBg841827
Hillingdon LB711131421
Hounslow LB1414132836
Islington LB3251018
Kingston-upon-Thames LB1518203036
Lambeth LB7891421
Lewisham LB4451018
London Borough of Kensington and Chelsea1113132233
London Corporation0001018
Merton LB911181827
Newham LB2321018
North London Waste Authority6781218
Redbridge LB7891421
Richmond upon Thames LB14n/a162836
Southwark LB3331018
Sutton LB1627253336
Tower Hamlets LB3231018
Waltham Forest LB6981218
Wandsworth LB8771624
West London Waste Authority99121827
Western Riverside Waste Authority81191624
Westminster City Council6771218
West Sussex
Adur District Council1722173336
Arun District Council1414142836
Chichester District Council1214122436
Crawley Borough Council1011102030
Horsham District Council1313132636
Mid Sussex District Council1820183336
West Sussex County Council1216172436
Worthing Borough Council1212122436


24 Feb 2003 : Column 95W

Government have provided extra funding to help authorities meet these standards through successive increases in the EPCS spending block, which includes waste services, and through the National Waste Minimisation and Recycling Challenge Fund under which West Sussex made a successful bid for a project to raise the awareness of waste issues. A separate Capital Fund of £21.3 million was established for authorities across London.

West Sussex has also been successful in receiving approval for PFI funding for a recycling led waste project that aims to enable them to reach their target for 2005–06 of 36 per cent. and achieve long term recycling and composting levels comparable with the highest in Europe.

It is too soon to tell whether individual authorities in London and West Sussex or elsewhere, will meet the standards. In September 2002 I wrote to the leaders of 141 councils asking them to let me know how they intend to meet their 2003–04 Statutory Performance Standard for recycling and composting of household waste of which the following were in London and West Sussex:


24 Feb 2003 : Column 96W

Telephone Helplines

Mr. Lazarowicz: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many telephone helplines are sponsored by her Department; and which of these helplines are charged at (a) national rate, (b) premium rate and (c) local rate. [95710]

Alun Michael: Defra operates 13 helpline telephone numbers, of which two are free of charge, five are charged at local rate and the remainder are charged at national rate. Of these one is a central Defra helpline, seven are operated by Rural Payments Agency, one each by the British Cattle Movement Service, Pets Helpline, Animal Movements, Agricultural Wages Board and Environmental Impact Assessment.

A number of Defra telephone phone lines are published via the Department's website and in printed publications as contact points for enquiries on specific

24 Feb 2003 : Column 97W

subjects. These services are not established or operated under the same criteria as the helplines referred to above.

Similar details for other agencies and non-departmental bodies sponsored by the Department could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.


Next Section Index Home Page