Previous Section Index Home Page


17 Mar 2003 : Column 588W—continued

PFI Prisons

Matthew Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which PFI funded prisons have payments to the contractors related to reoffending rates. [101763]

Hilary Benn: A performance bonus can be paid to Premier Prison Services Ltd if the contractor reduces recidivism in respect of the proportion of prisoners at the therapeutic community at Dovegate prison who have undertaken at least 15 months therapy in the community. They must also not have committed an offence within 12 months of release from custody; There has been insufficient time for a bonus to become payable because the therapeutic community only opened in November 2001.

Matthew Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the average cost per year of a prisoner held in (a) PFI funded and (b) non PFI funded prisons in each of the last three years; and if he will make a statement. [101764]

Hilary Benn: The average cost per prisoner held in Private Finance Initiative (PFI) funded and non PFI funded prisons in each of the last three years is shown, in the table.

These figures are establishment costs only and exclude any share of Headquarters overheads. Establishment cost per prisoner figures cannot therefore be compared with the overall Prison Service cost per prisoner figure, which includes all expenditure.

The figures for 1999–2000 and 2000–01 are expressed in cash terms, with those for 2001–02 expressed in resource terms.

CashResource
1999–2000 (£)2000–01(£)2001–02
Acklington16,21716,05016,459
Albany20,23420,36821,853
Altcourse*41,80143,59637,029
Ashfield*46,32333,314
Ashwell15,81617,26420,204
Askham Grange21,64421,91622,431
Aylesbury .28,31428,21331,466
Bedford20,03721,81920,414
Belmarsh35,54235,09136,608
Birmingham14,55415,80619,839
Blakenhurst*17,37217,96511,540
Blantyre House20,01020,94621,315
Blundeston24,11022,67524,074
Brinsford19,70123,03626,767
Bristol29,17134,80829,872
Brixton22,96524,75625,756
Brockhill31,73733,96036,729
Buckley Hall*19,86617,08820,469
Bullingdon15,32116,60117,073
Bullwood Hall34,58031,45833,693
Camp Hill19,18019,12019,231
Canterbury28,31435,96621,955
Cardiff18,05822,08020,800
Castington29,41543,72437,740
Channings Wood18,33618,79419,108
Chelmsford22,95624,80024,770
Coldingley24,49020,50521,754
Cookham Wood22,17322,10624,264
Dartmoor21,47522,08024,369
Deerbolt20,09721,20323,968
Doncaster*19,88918,83617,028
Dorchester21,29323,41523,785
Dover22,61821,69833,600
Downview19,31218,93535,572
Drake Hall22,35927,65124,784
Durham22,55226,32032,303
East Sutton Park21,63922,82823,705
Eastwood Park22,73422,02323,403
Elmley15,87416,26716,523
Erlestoke19,76119,83219,398
Everthorpe17,45517,03218,446
Exeter20,69122,11221,467
Featherstone18,75118,98921,337
Feltham24,02032,72437,471
Ford16,03916,11415,260
Forest Bank13,60832,39223,243
Foston Hall25,84229,79027,422
Frankland43,41842,70638,480
Full Sutton39,34239,23439,827
Garth18,92619,56021,016
Gartree24,24526,78231,522
Glen Parva18,36920,63821,642
Gloucester22,33524,38325,869
Grendon22,59425,22825,345
Guys Marsh15,36415,54815,928
Haslar16,94318,71719,526
Hatfield27,28228,89824,428
Haverigg23,46421,55117,955
Hewell Grange14,79515,41718,022
High Down24,09525,09124,374
Highpoint18,90019,95320,056
Hindley24,98927,42830,032
Hollesley Bay34,81536,24237,678
Holloway38,52140,58141,622
Holme House16,21118,19217,891
Hull25,99124,55624,056
Huntercombe29,59526,55130,628
Kingston24,63726,68926,102
Kirkham21,45618,86822,226
Kirklevington14,73815,56616,355
Lancaster27,05734,00025,268
Lancaster Farms21,72223,12323,478
Latchmere House14,70114,48717,842
Leeds17,15918,84518,876
Leicester22,67723,40423,989
Lewes21,96021,83221,672
Leyhill20,94822,33522,592
Lincoln23,47324,20722,666
Lindholme23,61327,14624,941
Littlehey14,92115,78416,653
Liverpool17,47620,30218,957
Long Lartin45,32942,62747,431
Low Newton42,75730,94827,454
Lowdham Grange*30,49029,63025,667
Maidstone19,67821,09727,607
Manchester23,28524,87322,245
Moorland17,78017,92319,625
Morton Hall14,36033,51427,265
Mount15,33914,65615,896
New Hall21,61023,29928,731
North Sea Camp17,12717,72319,369
Northallerton18,49223,35526,164
Norwich19,20420,69419,509
Nottingham21,24720,96320,786
Onley20,18622,06224,617
Parc*37,81438,95032,237
Parkhurst25,86426,33428,450
Pentonville18,59518,82919,136
Portland17,78620,34823,949
Preston18,60522,15323,816
Ranby15,96417,04717,623
Reading26,41729,63328,700
Risley19,77519,18020,462
Rochester23,09925,43835,686
Rye Hill*24,635
Send28,60920,05521,315
Shepton Mallet21,70729,80729,470
Shrewsbury19,54519,73419,762
Stafford16,92617,08117,201
Standford Hill19,71119,67621,106
Stocken15,43815,49816,493
Stoke Heath18,53323,84725,959
Styal23,30023,95125,375
Sudbury14,39414,20615,213
Swaleside18,74817,31917,933
Swansea21,78024,81728,920
Swinfen Hall23,75722,24023,883
Thorn Cross28,14029,61833,671
Usk19,75519,93221,016
Verne15,38215,73316,823
Wakefield33,73034,09535,688
Wandsworth17,53518,57218,735
Wayland15,29415,05115,821
Wealstun16,90116,77817,990
Weare19,01518,72819,478
Wellingborough19,23817,18518,163
Werrington46,19747,46641,778
Wetherby23,28030,13326,438
Whatton16,75117,50218,048
Whitemoor53,14952,40256,837
Winchester18,70119,76020,498
Wolds*23,32624,78621,665
Woodhill27,76231,65732,807
Wormwood Scrubs28,71226,77922,778
Wymott17,42719,62218,897

* PFI prisons

Notes:

1. Buckley Hall and Blakenhurst reverted to public sector management in 2000–01 and 2001–02 respectively.

2. Ashfield and Rye Hill opened in 1999–2000 and 2000–01 respectively. Part year performance is not reported.


17 Mar 2003 : Column 590W

Matthew Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment his Department has made of the proportion of savings realised from PFI funded prisons which are due to (a) capital costs and (b) running costs in the last three years; and if he will make a statement. [101762]

Hilary Benn: Savings in private finance initiative (PFI) prison projects are expressed as the percentage difference between the Net Present Value of each project compared with its Public Sector Comparator; the Net Present Value of a project is its discounted value over the

17 Mar 2003 : Column 591W

duration of the contract. Savings made in respect of the seven PFI funded prisons are shown in the following table.

Percentage
Altcourse17
Ashfield14
Dovegate17
Forest Bank16
Lowdham Grange14
Pare1
Rye Hill16

It is not possible to separate capital and running costs because a single unitary charge is paid to the contractor in respect of the total cost of each prison.


Police

Chris Ruane: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what percentage of police funding was spent on police pensions in each of the last 20 years; and what amounts these figures represent. [101246]

Mr. Denham: The information is set out in the following table.

YearNet expenditure (£ million)Net pensions expenditure (£ million)Net pensions expenditure as a proportion of police net expenditure in England and Wales (percentage)
1983–842,505.0135.55.4
1984–852,460.3176.57.2
1985–862,768.7180.66.5
1986–873,097.1223.57.2
1987–883,367.8237.07.0
1988–893,710.8253.7.6.8
1989–904,145.1292.17.0
1990–914,606.7333.27.2
1991–925,209.8399.97.7
1992–935,621.8456.58.1
1993–945,904.1536.89.1
1994–956,173.3611.59.9
1995–966,309.1678.210.7
1996–976,619.8749.011.3
1997–986,870.1874.912.7
1998–997,070.7900.612.7
1999–20007,450.3948.012.7
2000–017,771.0998.412.8
2001–028,169.31,117.113.7
2002–038,423.61,189.914.1

Source:

The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Police statistics 1983–84 to 2000–01 (Actuals) and 2001–02 to 2002–03 (Estimates).


Mr. Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many police officers there were in the London borough of Havering in each month since September 2002. [101956]

Mr. Denham: Information on the number of officers in each Basic Command Unit (BCU) is provided annually (31 March) by each police force to Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary. Information on London borough strength is not centrally collected on a more frequent basis. The deployment of resources

17 Mar 2003 : Column 592W

between the London borough divisions and the other specialist units of the Metropolitan Police Service is an operational matter for the Commissioner.

I refer the hon. Member to my reply of 2 December 2002, Official Report, column 589W, to the hon. Member for Southwark, North and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes), setting out police strength for each Basic Command Unit for each force in England and Wales, including London boroughs at 31 March 2002.

Mr. Kidney: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the Answer of 24 February 2003, Official Report, column 2, on police pensions, what he estimates the cost to public funds would be of establishing a pay-as-you-go police pension scheme applying to new recruits only. [101926]

Mr. Denham: I understand that my hon. Friend means what we estimate the cost would be of establishing a funded pension scheme applying to new recruits only. As stated in the National Policing Plan we are considering options for modernising police pensions to make them more flexible and affordable for future entrants. As part of this reform, we will also seek to meet the needs of police authorities and chief officers for a scheme which brings greater certainty about the financial impact on individual police forces. Unlike in a pay-as-you go scheme, the employer pays contributions into a pension fund at the same time as the employee. The eventual pension is then paid out of the fund. In a pay-as-you go scheme the employer's costs are deferred until the pension comes into payment. The rate of employer's contributions in a funded police pension scheme for new entrants would depend mainly on the value of the pensions and other benefits provided, and the share borne by the officers. The immediate effect of introducing a funded scheme for new entrants, while keeping the existing scheme on a pay-as-you go basis, would be to increase costs. This is because the cost of paying employer contributions in respect of contributing members of a new funded scheme would be added to the continuing cost of paying the pension benefits of retired members of the current pay-as-you go scheme.

Mr. Wiggin: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on progress made with the Home Office's National Recruitment Standards Project, with special reference to recruitment and retention of people with diabetes in the police service; and when the recommendations for the proposed new medical standards will be available for consultation. [102410]

Mr. Denham: The National Recruitment Standards project has made progress on a number of key areas:


17 Mar 2003 : Column 593W


Next Section Index Home Page