Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
31 Mar 2003 : Column 510Wcontinued
Mr. Chope: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if it is the policy of the Government that premises owned by brass bands and used for rehearsals and practice should be subject to licensing. [104744]
Dr. Howells: Under the Licensing Bill rehearsing or practising of any form of entertainment would not be licensable unless it is intended to be provided for the public or a charge was made for a private audience. Other users of, for instance, a village hall, passing through the practice or rehearsal area would not trigger the licensing requirements.
Rob Marris: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what guidance her Department issues to civil servants on how to deal with claims from organisations that the information they provide to the Department is commercially confidential. [105553]
Dr. Howells: Procurement in the Department for Culture, Media and Sport is the responsibility of procurement staff qualified by examination and experience and who, by virtue of the professional training they have received, are able to deal with questions of commercial confidentiality without further guidance.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what her estimate is of the expenditure of her Department on newspapers, magazines and periodicals in 2002. [106311]
Dr. Howells: The Department's spend on newspapers, magazines and periodicals in 200203 was £29,393.
Mr. Maude: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if she will list (a) the title and subject, (b) the total cost to her Department and (c) the commissioned author or organisation of each external
31 Mar 2003 : Column 511W
report commissioned by her Department in each year since 1997. [103712]
Dr. Howells: The title and subject, cost and the commissioned author or organisation of each external report commissioned by the Department in each year since 1997 is shown in the following table.
31 Mar 2003 : Column 512W
An "external report" has been interpreted as being a report produced at the request of government by a person, group or organisation external to the department, and which is publicly available. These costs are exclusive of any costs incurred by the Department in the publication of these reports which could have been obtained only at a disproportionate cost.
Year | Title | Cost £ (including VAT where indicated) | Author |
---|---|---|---|
1997 | A review of the Ecclesiastical Exemption from listed building controls jointly with the Welsh Office): Listings | 30,000 | John Newman |
1998 | A study to assess the economic impact of Government policies for digital television and for the closure of analogue transmission: Broadcasting | (4)37,996.93 | National Economic Research Associates |
1998 | A feasibility study for compiling a tourism satellite account for the United Kingdom: Tourism | not known | Cambridge Policy consultants and Geoff Broom Associates |
1999 | Coalfields and the Lottery: Lottery | (4)13,240 | Tony Gore, Gordon Dabinett and Jonathan Breeze Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University |
1999 | Establising a new National Tourism Body for Tourism in EnglandReport and Action plan: Tourism | 18,000 | Angela Heath |
1999 | The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Government-sponsored Museums and Galleries: Museums and Galleries | (4)260,424 | Deloitte Touche and Lord Cultural Resources and Planning |
1999 | Review of the future funding of the BBC: Broadcasting | not known | Gavyn Davies |
2000 | Improving Lottery Funding Access and Delivery in the British Coalfield: Lottery | (4)30,475 | Tony Gore, Gordon Dabinett and Jonathan Breeze Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University |
2000 | Out of the BoxThe Programme Supply Market in the Digital AgeBroadcasting | (4)76,051.88 | David Graham and Associates |
2000 | Review of the BBC's Financial Projections: Broadcasting | (4)23,4847 | PKF |
2001 | A study into the Social Impacts of Lottery good cause spending in the UK: Lottery | (4)21,296.95 | Graeme Evans and Phyllidia Shaw, Centre for Leisure and Tourism Studies, University of North London |
2001 | Future of the Royal Park ConstabularyThe Speed Report: Royal Parks Agency | 20,950 | Anthony Speed |
2001 | Review of the Tote privitisation sale strategy/An updated assessment reflection of the Tote's current financial projections and business plan: Gambling | 20,000 | PricewaterhouseCoopers |
2001 | To quantify the enviromental and cost saving benefits of waste minimisation in the hotels sector: Tourism | 19,900 | AEA Technology |
2001 | Review of the BBC's Fair Trading Commitment and Commercial Policy: Broadcasting | not known | Michael Whish |
2001 | English National Stadium ReviewInterim Report(5) | 46,000 | Patrick Carter |
2002 | UK Television Programme Supply review | 25,0000 | ITC |
2002 | Final Evaluation of the Travel Cumbria Project: Tourism | 4,995 | Halcrow Fox |
2002 | The Economic Impact of TourismNorth East pilot study: NE England Economy | 10,000 | Trends Business Research with Cogentsi |
2002 | Independent Review of BBC News 24: Broadcasting | (4)39,473.4 | Richard Lambert |
2002 | Lessons LearnedReview of the 2002 Commonwealth Games in Manchester Final ReportDecember 2002(6) | 0 | KPMG |
2002 | English National Stadium ReviewFinal Report(7) | 346,000 | Patrick Carter |
2002 | Survey of Public Opinion on a London 2012 Olympic Bid(8) | 37,750 | ICM Polling |
2003 | Considering the potential taxation implications arising from he planned transfer of assets upon abolition of the Levy Board: Horserace Betting Levy Board | 5,023 | PKF |
2003 | E-commerce Impact Study on the Tourism Sector: Tourism(8) | 0 | PricewaterhouseCoopers |
(4) Indicates that VAT has been charged
(5) This figure includes the costs of the Review of the National Athletics Centre for Sport England.
(6) Jointly commissioned by DCMS, Sport England and Manchester city council in August 2002. The cost of the report was met from Games funding to which DCMS contributed but there is no direct, invoiced cost to us
(7) Published 16 October 2002. Costs of the Review process from 19 December 2001 to present day
(8) Although commissioned by the Department, this report was paid for by ukonline.
The costs of these reports could be obtained only at a disproportionate cost.
31 Mar 2003 : Column 513W
Martin Linton: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what awards have been made to the Battersea constituency by the distributing bodies of the National Lottery in each of the last five years. [105641]
Mr. Caborn: According to the National Lottery awards database, which is based upon the information provided by the Lottery distributors, the number of awards that have been made to the Battersea constituency by each of the National Lottery good causes in the last five calendar years is set out in the following table:
1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arts | 5 | 9 | 18 | 14 | 14 |
Charitable expenditure | 5 | 13 | 3 | 11 | 12 |
Health, education and the environment | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
Heritage | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Millennium | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sports | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
Mr. Gareth Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what action she is taking to (a) increase and (b) refurbish sports facilities in London; and if she will make a statement. [105598]
Mr. Caborn: Local authorities are the key providers of sport and recreation facilities in their areas. For that reason they are responsible for making the difficult judgments about what sports facilities to provide at the expense of local taxpayers, and the decisions about the renovation of local facilities.
Significant investment from the National Lottery has helped to create new state of the art community sports facilities. Local authorities may apply to the Lottery Sports Fund for grants for the creation of new sports facilities, and the upgrading of existing facilities to increase participation. London boroughs have received 201 grants from the Lottery Sports Fund's Community Capital Fund totalling over £249.5 million, for projects costing over £675 million.
Local education authorities in the London boroughs will also benefit from the New Opportunities Fund's PE and Sport programme which aims to bring about a step change in the provision of sports facilities for young people and for the local community. The New Opportunities Fund provisionally allocated funding to each local education authority area to ensure that funding is available for projects in all parts of the country. Local education authorities in London have been allocated £81,286,000 under the programme.
The Government's planning guidance to local authorities (PPG 17) requires local planning authorities to undertake assessments to determine what deficiencies exist in their areas and to remedy those deficiencies in provision via their plans and planning decisions.
31 Mar 2003 : Column 514W
Next Section | Index | Home Page |