Previous Section Index Home Page


7 Apr 2003 : Column 51W—continued

Central Line

Mr. Mark Field: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the timescale is for the opening of the remaining stations on the Central Line. [105821]

Mr. Jamieson: I am pleased to report that following the reintroduction of a service on the western section of the Central Line between Ealing Broadway and Marble Arch on Monday 24 March, London Underground began running a service from Loughton to Ealing Broadway through central London from 3 April. I expect a service to be running to all stations on the line by Easter.

Central Railways

Mr. Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will place in the Library a copy of the

7 Apr 2003 : Column 52W

(a) report and (b) recommendations of the Strategic Rail Authority regarding the proposed Central Railway project. [104146]

Mr. Jamieson: Ministers have not yet reached a decision on Central Railway's proposed hybrid Bill. We are considering whether and in what form to make available the SRA's advice, in line with our commitment to open government, bearing in mind that some of the information it contains may be commercially sensitive.

Chancery Lane Derailment

Mr. George Osborne: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the meetings that have taken place between Ministers in his Department and London Underground Ltd. to discuss the consequences of the derailment at Chancery Lane. [107254]

Mr. Jamieson: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Tom Brake) on 17 March 2003, Official Report, column 537W.

Dartford Tunnel

Mr. Chope: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what plans the Government has to refurbish the Dartford Tunnel; [107587]

Mr. Jamieson: I have asked the Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Mr. Tim Matthews, to reply to the hon. Member.

Letter from David York to Mr. Christopher Chope, dated 7 April 2003:






Mersey Tunnel

Mr. Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on the policing of the Mersey Tunnel, with special reference to the deaths of Darren Franey and Scott Veach. [105691]

7 Apr 2003 : Column 53W

Mr. Jamieson: The Government are sorry to learn of the circumstances which led to the death of Darren Franey and Scott Veach.

Responsibility for the policing of the Mersey Tunnels rests with Merseyside Passenger Transport Authority (Merseytravel), under provisions in the County of Merseyside Act 1980.

We, along with colleagues at the Home Office, will give careful consideration to the reports and recommendations that have been produced following the investigation into this tragic incident by Merseyside police under the supervision of the Police Complaints Authority and by the Coroner.

Mr. Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on who sets the performance standards for the Mersey Tunnels Police Force; and what relation they have to the Police Complaints Authority. [106028]

Mr. Jamieson: Responsibility for the policing of Mersey Tunnel rests with Merseyside Passenger Transport Authority (Merseytravel), under provisions in the County of Merseyside Act 1980.

As Merseytravel is primarily responsible for the safe operation of the Mersey Tunnels, it falls on it to ensure that the law enforcement officers it appoints are trained to a standard that protects both the officers involved and users of the Tunnels and to provide such facilities necessary for the officers to carry out their duties in a safe and proper manner.

The Police Complaints Authority (PCA) has no remit over the Mersey Tunnels Police. As a "non-Home Office" force they fall outside the primary legislation of the Police Act 1996 and no subsequent agreement has been reached to bring them within the PCA's remit. However, the Tunnel police have an agreement with Merseyside police for the investigation of incidents involving Merseyside police vehicles within the jurisdiction of the Tunnel police. Merseyside police do fall within the remit of the PCA; therefore, any investigation undertaken by the Merseyside police can be supervised by the PCA.

7 Apr 2003 : Column 54W

Motorways

Mr. Collins: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what risks he has identified in (a) permanent removal and (b) variable removal of a hard shoulder on a motorway; [106894]

Mr. Jamieson: I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 18 March 2003, Official Report, columns 618–19W to the hon. Member for Colchester (Bob Russell).

Rail Freight

Mr. Lazarowicz: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on the role of rail freight in the UK freight market. [107026]

Mr. Jamieson: The Government are committed to increasing rail freight's modal share of the freight market in line with its commitment to sustainable distribution. The Strategic Rail Authority's Strategic Plan, published on 30 January, sets out its plans for achieving the increase in rail freight envisaged in the Government's 10 Year Plan for Transport.

Rail Funding

Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the (a) amount and (b) source of funding (i) paid, (ii) contracted and (iii) agreed to be paid by non Strategic Rail Authority sources, to supplement the Rail Passenger Partnership schemes set out on page 23 of the Strategic Rail Authority Annual Report 2001–02. [104491]

Mr. Jamieson: The information is not readily available in precisely the form requested. Information about the total amount of support from non-Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) sources to supplement the Rail Passenger Partnership (RPP) schemes set out on page 23 of the SRA's 2001–02 Annual Report is shown in the table below. The non-SRA funding element of RPP schemes often includes sponsorship from more than one source. Typically schemes include support from the local authorities and the relevant train operating company, and other sponsors to date have included (amongst others) Network Rail, the Countryside Agency, Regional Development Agencies, Community Rail Partnerships, the National Assembly for Wales and the Scottish Executive.

£ million

SchemeSRA fundingFunding from non-SRA sources
Hexham-Carlisle: passenger information99,00029,000
Heart of Wales additional Sunday services68,8867,000
Taff Corridor: additional rolling stock575,000(3)0
Brentford: service and station improvements1,250,000974,000
Thornaby: improved station facilities179,000289,000
Redruth: station improvements95,000116,000
Tamar Valley: Sunday services72,27220,000
Metro: additional rolling stock (Class 333s)
Clitheroe—Blackburn services244,00061,000
Carmarthen—Milford Haven: additional rolling stock216,4000
Liskeard II Revised Bid (original approved bid withdrawn by sponsor and revised bid approved)
Tees Valley: additional cycle parking48,99049,000
Swanage: new services6,821,0009,844
Southminster Branch Line: additional Sunday services85,0000
Sudbury Branch Line: additional Winter Sunday services80,0000
Beauly: station re-opening99,340120,000
First Great Eastern: additional cycle parking34,28635,000
Traintaxi: information database serving all stations ATOC (MML)24,00024,000
Saltash: station improvements95,00011,000
Willesden—Clapham: additional Sunday services65,00056,000
Ludlow: ticket office89,00011,000
First North Western: additional rolling stock (Class 142s)2,657,0000
Cross City Line (Birmingham): higher frequency of trains3,455,0001,018
Truto—Falmouth: all year Sunday service64,00067,000
Bromsgrove: station improvements180,00070,000
Robin Hood Line (Nottingham): additional train services234,00070,000
SmartCard: integrated transport ATOC (Vergin CrossCountry)970,0001,305,000
Matlock—Derby: feasibility study190,000610,000
Kent station: additional cycle parking118,000102,000
Penzance interchange: station improvements250,000519,000
Exeter—Barnstaple: additional services144,00068,000
Cardiff Valley Lines: service strengthening738,0000
Doncaster: station improvementsNow to be funded through an alternative mechanism
Royal Welsh Show services19,6616,000

(3) References to £0 non-SRA sponsorship in this table do not take into account benefits in kind (e.g. in terms of staff resources) provided by the relevant train operating company to enable the scheme to operate.


7 Apr 2003 : Column 55W

Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on the total level of Rail Passenger Partnership funding to be paid by the Strategic Rail Authority during the financial year 2003–04, with particular reference to the nature of the schemes to which any such funding would be directed. [104493]

Mr. Jamieson: The Strategic Rail Authority's (SRA's) budget for Rail Passenger Partnership schemes in 2003–04 is £20 million of which £16.3 million is currently committed. Funding is directed to the provision of new or enhanced local and regional rail services that cannot be justified on financial grounds alone but which contribute to the Government's wider objectives for rail, including modal shift and integration with other modes.

Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) if he will list the (a) amount and (b) source of funding (i) paid, (ii) contracted and (iii) agreed to be paid by non Strategic Rail Authority sources to

7 Apr 2003 : Column 56W

supplement Rail Passenger Partnership Scheme applications of 2002–03 which have been (A) approved, (B) deferred and (C) cancelled; [104494]

Mr. Jamieson: The information cannot readily be provided in precisely the form requested. The table as follows sets out details of RPP scheme applications in 2002–03, their current status and the amount of SRA and non-SRA support involved in the case of schemes that have been approved. The level of funding for schemes prior to approval stage is liable tochange.

Schemes may be deferred, cancelled or rejected for a number of reasons, such as failure to meet SRA's value for money and affordability criteria, failure to attract adequate sponsorship from non-SRA sources, and withdrawal of the application by the sponsor.

RPP schemes 20020–03
£ million

SchemeStatus of schemeSRA funding for approved schemesNon-SRA funding for approved schemes
West Anglia CIS (customer information system)Rejected
DoncasterScheme now being funded through alternative mechanism
Project CymruApproved2,471,000265,000
Markinch InterchangeRejected
Coleshill InterchangeRejected
WeardalePre-qualified
Exeter Gateway (St. Davids)Pre-qualified
GreenhithePre-qulified
DartfordPre-qualified
Cheshunt BayPre-qualified
Arriva Trains Northern capacity and reliabilityApproved4,102,0771,000
Conwy Valley LineRejected
West Midland CISPre-qualified
Ferensway InterchangePre-qualified
Hull Royal Infirmary Rail HaltRejected
Salford CentralPre-qualified
Heart of Wales2, Winter Sundays. (Original approved bid withdrawn by sponsor and re-submitted)Decision pending
Bury St. EdmundsApproved223,4000350,000
BurnleyApproved259,000240,000
StanstedRejected
Liskeard II Revised BidApproved248,000352,000
MacclesfieldApproved250,000535,000
ChorleyApproved137,000130,000
PlymouthApproved136,000132,000
Downham Market AccessApproved229,000130,000
Tarka Line (Exeter to Barnstaple)Approved144,000223,000
Exeter to Exmouth (Phase 1)Deferred
Valley Lines dedicated bus serviceApproved41,000(4)0
Bristol servicesApproved139,0000
LittleportApproved77,600135,000
Plus Bus Journey SolutionsDeferred
Devon and CornwallApproved234,0000
GlasshoughtonApproved250,0001,610
RamsgateApproved85,000100,000
BedfordRejected
SouthminsterRejected
Valley LinesRejected
First Great Eastern Cycle ParkingApproved98,00069,000
Manchester to ClitheroeRejected
HalesworthRejected
King's Cross FaçadeRejected
Horwich ParkwayApproved100,000115k
WatlingtonRejected
Cheshunt Bus/Rail IntegrationRejected
HastingsRejected
Wherry LineRejected
Thameslink CycleApproved54,00055k
TrowbridgeApproved13,00010k
TauntonDeferred
Bristol Temple MeadsDeferred
Chippenham InterchangeDecision pending
London Crosslink2 (now Phase 1&2)Deferred
Anglia Locals2 (Phase 1&2)Pre-qualified/Rejected
Filton Abbey WoodApproved1,268,0000
Ebbw ValePre-qualified (Scheme now being funded by the National Assembly for Wales)
Paddington vehicular accessPre qualified-Rejected
SheffieldApproved (pre qualified 2001–02)163,0000
Matlock BuxtonApproved (pre qualifed (2001–02)190,000610,000
West London LineApproved18,0000
Probus-BurngullowPre-qualified700k

(4) References to £0 non-SRA sponsorship do not take into account benefits in kind (e.g. in terms of staff resources) provided by the relevant train operating company to enable the scheme to operate.


7 Apr 2003 : Column 57W


Next Section Index Home Page