Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
28 Apr 2003 : Column 96Wcontinued
Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what budget he has provided for the establishment of local tobacco control alliances. [109070]
28 Apr 2003 : Column 97W
Ms Blears: The Cancer Plan committed up to £1 million a year over three years (200003) to support the establishment and operation of the alliances. For the first year, core funds were provided to begin building these alliances, the second year saw a mixture of core funding and project or operational funds, with the last year (200203) providing only project work funds.
The total funds to support local alliance projects for the year 200203 was £751,277 and was distributed between September 2002 and January 2003. Further funds were used to provide a national co-ordinator and regular update meetings. Funding arrangements for 200304 are currently being finalised.
Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he last visited a local health authority in London to see TB screening and prevention services. [106562]
Ms Blears: Departmental officials visited the Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham Tuberculosis team to observe TB screening of the homeless on 22 and 29 July 2002.
Officials also visited the mobile screening unit during its screening project/pilot in London on 21 November 2002.
Mr. Yeo: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what policy on (a) core hours and (b) flexible working hours is operated by his Department and each agency and non-departmental public body for which his Department is responsible. [107649]
Mr. Hutton: The working day is divided into band widths and core times. In the Department of Health these are:
Starting bandwidths | 07.0010.00 |
Morning core time | 10.0012.00 |
Lunchtime band widths | 12.0014.00 |
Afternoon core time | 14.0015.30 |
Finishing band widths | 15.3019.00 |
Core time is the busiest part of the day when all staff are supposed to be at work. Absence during core time can only be with line management permission or for sickness or for some other unexpected reason which prevents someone being at work.These arrangements also apply to most of the Department's agencies and non-departmental bodies. Those with varying bandwidths and core times to suit their local operational needs, are listed as follows.
The NHS Pensions Agency have the following bandwidths which were agreed with local Trades Unions (TUS):
Starting bandwidth | 07.0009.30 |
Morning core time | 09.3012.00 |
Lunchtime bandwidth | 12.0014.00 |
Afternoon core time | 14.0015.00 |
Finishing bandwidth | 15.0019.00 |
The National Care Standards Commissionflexi-time is available to administrative support staff on salary bands 15 inclusive, only with line manager's approval. The following bandwidths apply:
28 Apr 2003 : Column 98W
Starting bandwidth | 08.0009.30 |
Morning core time | 09.3012.00 |
Lunchtime bandwidth | 12.0014.00 |
Afternoon core time | 14.0016.00 |
Finishing bandwidth | 16.0018.00 |
For other groups of staff that are not covered by the flexi-time scheme identified above, the commission supports the process of flexible working without the use of a formalised scheme.
The National Radiological Protection Board operate a similar flexible working hours scheme:
MondaysThursdays | Fridays | |
---|---|---|
Morning core time | 09.3011.45 | 09.3011.45 |
Afternoon core time | 14.0016.00 | 14.0015.30 |
Heads of Departments and Directorates do not participate.
Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will make a statement on the level of ISIS funding and the projects it has funded in 200203. [108604]
Ms Hewitt: In 20023 the ISIS facility, owned and operated by CCLRC, received £21,379,000 to fund its operations and the services it provides to its research users. This funding was provided from the following sources:
£000 | |
---|---|
EPSRC | 19,126 |
BBSRC | 228 |
NERC | 100 |
Overseas Partners: | 1,650 |
EU Framework Programme 6 | 275 |
In addition ISIS was active in the following major, multi-year, development projects:
Project | Overall value | Spent in FY 0203 | Internationalinvolvement |
---|---|---|---|
2nd harmonic upgrade | 7,000 | 2,210 | USA, Japan |
MERLIN | 3,852 | 350 | USA |
GEM | 3,563 | 335 | Japan |
ENGIN-X | 2,510 | 803 | |
SXD | 956 | 146 | |
He3 Spin Filters | 689 | 160 | FP5 partnership |
Target Station 2 preparation | 7,100 | 1,020 | |
Total | 25,670 | 5,024 | |
28 Apr 2003 : Column 99W
Mr. Norman: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what estimate she has made of the extra costs imposed on local authorities in the provision of (a) social services and (b) residential long-term care as a result of the increase in the national minimum wage. [109138]
Alan Johnson: The independent Low Pay Commission looked at this issue in their recent Report to the Government. 1
Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will press for EU action to prohibit the import of seal products where these have been obtained through the clubbing to death of seals. [107680]
Ms Hewitt [holding answer 7 April 2003]: EU Directive (83/129/EEC) prohibits imports of skins from seal pups and breeding mothers of certain species of seal. By protecting these sections of the seal population, the ban aims to protect overall numbers. The EU, with the strong support of the UK, continues to press for animal welfare concerns to be recognised as legitimate grounds for taking trade measures under WTO rules.
Mr. Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will make a statement on the funding of the UK Atomic Energy Authority Constabulary. [108176]
Mr. Wilson: The funding of the UKAEA Constabulary is paid by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, BNFL plc and URENCO Ltd. The Police Authority sets the annual budget for the Constabulary. Expenditure in financial year 200102 amounted to £23,381,000. The figure of expenditure for the year just ended is not yet available.
Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what plans she has to prevent the early shredding of (a) audit records and (b) bank reconciliations by auditors and to require audit records to be kept to facilitate investigation of audit failure; and if she will make a statement. [109159]
Miss Melanie Johnson: The keeping of audit records is covered by regulation 3.08b of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales (ICAEW) Audit Regulations 1995 (as amended in 1999). This regulation says that
28 Apr 2003 : Column 100W
Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations she has received from (a) accounting bodies and (b) professional bodies in support of her proposal to transfer regulatory functions in accountancy and audit from the Accountancy Foundation to the Financial Reporting Council. [109160]
Miss Melanie Johnson: The majority of accountancy bodies and other representative bodies that responded to the Government's consultation document on the review of the regulatory regime of the accountancy profession considered that there was a strong case for the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) taking on the functions of the Accountancy Foundation.
On 29 January 2003 my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry announced that she had accepted the conclusions of the Review team, the main conclusion of which was that the FRC should take on the functions of the Accountancy Foundation. On 11 March the Government published a consultation document on proposals for statutory provisions to support the new regulatory functions of the FRC. The consultation period closes on 10 June.
Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what plans she has to cap auditor liabilities; what representations she has received on this from (a) audit firms, (b) professional bodies, (c) the European Commission and (d) academics; and if she will make a statement. [109161]
Miss Melanie Johnson: The Government is considering proposals on auditor liability and will consult on its own detailed proposals in due course.
We have not received any specific representations on the question of auditor liability; however, a range of interested parties submitted views to the Company Law Review as part of its extensive consultation process. These are on the public record.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |