Previous Section Index Home Page


15 May 2003 : Column 374W—continued

Efficiency Savings

Mr. Bercow: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the target is for efficiency savings in 2003–04 expressed (a) in money terms and (b) as a percentage of the Department's expenditure limit. [114108]

Dawn Primarolo: The Treasury's targets are set out in its Public Service Agreement and Service Delivery Agreement.

Employers Insurance

Mr. Stephen O'Brien: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what plans he has to use the increased tax revenues resulting from higher insurance premiums to set up a fund to cover employers against remote risks. [100087]

Ruth Kelly: None.

Euro

Huw Irranca-Davies: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the impact on manufacturing in (a) Wales and (b) the United Kingdom if the UK does not become part of the Eurozone. [113538]

Ruth Kelly: The Government is committed to publishing a comprehensive and rigorous assessment of the five tests within two years of the start of this Parliament. A number of detailed supporting studies will be published alongside the assessment. As set out in the 6 September 2002 'Paper for the Treasury Select Committee on the Treasury's Approach to the Preliminary and Technical Work', a supporting study will be published on "The impact of EMU on business in different manufacturing and service sectors of the UK economy".

European Central Bank

Mr. Bercow: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what his policy is towards the proposed changes in the (a) voting and (b) decision making procedures of the European Central Bank. May [112287]

Ruth Kelly: The Government are keen that any changes to the ECB's voting modalities secure an effective decision-making body in the ECB.

Given the provisions of the "enabling clause" inserted into the ESCB Statute under the Treaty of Nice and the requirement for unanimity in both the Governing Council and the Council, the Government believe that the proposed changes represent a feasible option for achieving this at the current stage.

Financial Advisers

Dr. Cable: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the number of financial advisers who are operating without professional indemnity insurance. [113223]

Ruth Kelly: The FSA tell me that, as at 6 May 2003, 1,741 out of 2,674 (65 per cent.) of IFAs (whose PII expired between 1 September 2002 and 30 April 2003) have told the FSA that they have obtained cover.

An analysis of the information they provided shows that 94 per cent. of IFAs due to renew their cover in September have done so. The figure for October is 96 per cent., November 87 per cent., December 75 per cent., January 62 per cent., February 63 per cent., March 34 per cent., and April 13 per cent.

This does not necessarily mean that the other IFAs have not got cover. IFAs are reluctant to confirm that they have cover until they have received a cover note

15 May 2003 : Column 375W

even though they may have agreed terms with their broker. This means that there is usually a gap between the expiry of an IFA's PII policy and the receipt of confirmation that the policy has been renewed, by the FSA. The FSA are contacting the remaining firms to establish their position.

Consumer Prices

Mr. Flook: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the impact on the measurement of inflation of moving from the RPIX method to the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices method in (a) each of the last five years and (b) the next three years; and if he will make a statement. [113577]

Ruth Kelly: RPIX and HICP inflation data are published monthly by the ONS in their First Release on consumer price indices. Projections for RPIX and HICP inflation to 2005 were presented in Box B7 of the 2003 Budget report.

Heavily Indebted Poor Countries

Mr. Gardiner: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what measures have been taken by his Department to increase creditor participation in debt alleviation for heavily indebted poor countries; [112917]

Hugh Bayley: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proposals the Government has made since the Kananaskis G8 summit (a) to provide more relief than envisaged at completion point for HIPCs that have debts above the thresholds as a result of commodity price shocks within the HIPC rules and (b) to press for a change in the rules to ensure that additional relief provided beyond HIPC by some bilateral donors is excluded from the calculations; what response the Government has received from other G8 members to its proposals; and if he will make a statement. [113651]

15 May 2003 : Column 376W

John Healey: At the G7 Kananaskis summit in 2002 the UK was instrumental in securing agreement that action was necessary to increase creditor participation in the HIPC initiative.

The G7 agreed to ask the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank to:


As far as non-Paris Club official bilateral creditors are concerned, the G7 asked the IMF and World Bank to encourage creditors who are members of the two organisations to participate fully in the HIPC Initiative, particularly relatively wealthy creditors that have a significant amount of claims. In addition, the G7 urged the IMF to identify creditor countries' participation in the Initiative ahead of any debt rescheduling with the Paris Club.

The G7 also agreed to ask the Chair of the Paris Club to consider inviting, on a case-by-case basis, non-member official creditors to participate in its negotiations with HIPC countries on the understanding that these creditors will join a satisfactory consensus and will abide by Paris Club principles.

The September 2002 HIPC Status of Implementation Report, prepared jointly by the staffs of the Fund and the World Bank, reported via a survey of HIPC countries on pending and completed creditor litigation. It also reported more generally on the status of creditor participation. At the Spring meetings of the World Bank and the IMF the Development Committee welcomed the recent paper by the Bank and the Fund that reviewed the difficult issues of creditor participation, including HIPC-to-HIPC debt relief and creditor litigation and welcomed the decision by the Bank to explore options to assist with HIPC-to-HIPC debt. The Development Committee agreed to discuss these issues again at the next meeting, and reiterated its request to creditors that had not yet done so to participate fully in the initiative. For its part the UK in a statement to the Development Committee by the Secretary of State for International Development and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, urged the Bank and Fund to explore further the issue of a 'donor funded' technical assistance facility to provide advice to HIPC countries facing litigation. The UK will pursue this issue and other outstanding HIPC issues such as the topping-up methodology at the forthcoming G8 summit in Evian and the next annual meetings of the Bank and Fund in September.

15 May 2003 : Column 377W

The September 2002 HIPC Status of Implementation Report and the paper on creditor participation issues in the enhanced HIPC initiative are available from the World Bank webslte at www.worldbank.org/hipc.

Mr. Gardiner: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what progress the World Bank and the IMF have made in developing a HIPC-to-HIPC trust fund. [112919]

John Healey: At the Spring meetings of the World Bank and the IMF the Development Committee welcomed the recent paper by the Bank and the Fund that reviewed the difficult issues of creditor participation, including HIPC-to-HIPC debt relief and creditor litigation and welcomed the decision by the Bank to explore options to assist with HIPC-to-HIPC debt. Where HIPCs find it difficult to deliver full HIPC relief due to financial constraints, one option would be a donor-financed trust fund to resolve these claims. The UK believes it is worth exploring this option further and will continue to work with the Bank and Fund to examine it in more detail.

Mr. Gardiner: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what progress there has been on organising an international conference on innovative mechanisms for providing debt relief, as advocated by the HIPC ministerial network. [112921]

John Healey: The Chancellor has proposed an International Finance Facility (IFF) that would seek to double the amount of development aid from just over US$50 billion a year today to $100 billion per year in the years to 2015. The IFF could also be used to help fund further debt relief for existing debts, which for some poor and indebted countries is a valuable instrument to help achieve the Millennium Development Goals.

At their eighth meeting in Kigali, Rwanda on 28–29 April 2003 36 HIPC Finance Ministers endorsed the UK proposal for an International Finance Facility, and urged that its funding should be fully additional and channelled to grants. The UK is promoting the IFF through a range of international fora and the communiqué from the April 2003 G7 Finance Ministers' meeting agreed they would continue to focus on the Millennium Development goals and their financing, including facilities, with a view to progress by the Evian Summit.


Next Section Index Home Page