Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
10 Jun 2003 : Column 762Wcontinued
Ms Shipley: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions she has had with (a) gas companies, (b) electricity companies and (c) water companies regarding their expansion in the south-east. [116220]
Mr. Wilson: None recently. However, the main responsibility for these issues is with the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and the appropriate local authorities. Interested companies would meet with Ministers and officials as necessary. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry may become involved in the issues for which she has regulatory responsibility.
Janet Anderson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what her policy is on whether printer ink and toner cartridges should be classed as consumables for the purposes of the EU Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. [118041]
Mr. Wilson: The European Commission has already made clear that these goods are considered consumables for the purposes of this Directive.
Bob Russell: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) what representations she has received in respect of the implementation of the European Union waste electrical and electronic equipment directive in respect of the re-use of printer ink and toner cartridges; and if she will make a statement; [118079]
(3) what the estimated annual turnover is for companies engaged in the re-use of printer ink and toner cartridges; [118081]
(4) what action she has taken to encourage the manufacture of re-usable printer ink and toner cartridges; and if she will make a statement; [118084]
(5) what estimate she has made of the amount of waste going to landfill sites each year as a result of the implementation of the European Union Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive preventing the re-use of printer ink and toner cartridges; and if she will make a statement. [118078]
Mr. Wilson: Several inkjet cartridge refill businesses have written to express their concern that their operations may be put at risk if the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive scope does not include these goods. I am making clear in my replies that we take these concerns seriously and that I am keen for this sector to continue to flourish. Industry estimates suggest there are over 100 companies that remanufacture ink and toner cartridges for reuse, employing over 2,000 people with another 20 plus
10 Jun 2003 : Column 763W
companies involved in the supply chain. Their combined turnover is said to be in the order of £150 million per annum.
The WEEE Directive does not prevent the reuse or refilling of printer cartridges. The concerns raised by the refill sector relate to existing technology, presently applied to a very small proportion of goods sold. Business estimates that 30 to 40 per cent. of toner and inkjet cartridges are presently reused or recycled equating to 6 to 8,000 tonnes per annum. The WEEE Directive will not affect this.
The European Commission has made clear that printer cartridges do not fall within the scope of the WEEE Directive, but that forthcoming eco-design based EU legislation may pick this issue up. The UK agrees with this assessment. In the mean time, if the spread of new technology preventing reuse starts to significantly impinge on the independent refill market, I will wish to consider what additional action might be necessary.
Mr. Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many rural filling stations and garages there were in Wales in 1991; how many there are now; and if she will make a statement. [117518]
Mr. Wilson: Historical and current data on rural filing stations numbers is not collected.
However, as part of my Downstream Oil Industry Forum initiative I have set up a Rural Task Force, which is currently developing a working definition of a rural filing station in order that numbers can be determined, and appropriate measures agreed.
Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the status of the Ministry of Defence's Depleted Uranium Oversight Board; what its membership is; who they are representing; and if he will place in the Library recent deliberations and statements made by the Board. [117596]
10 Jun 2003 : Column 764W
Dr. Moonie: I am placing a copy of the Depleted Uranium Oversight Board (DUOB) Terms of Reference and the current membership list in the Library of the House. Additionally, all deliberations and decisions made by the board are contained in the minutes of DUOB meetings which are publicly available on the internet at www.duob.org.uk.
Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the appointment of Dr. Chris Bushy to the Depleted Uranium Oversight Board, and explain the representative purpose of this appointment. [117597]
Dr. Moonie: Dr. Chris Busby was nominated for membership of the Depleted Uranium Oversight Board (DUOB) by a veterans' organisation during the open consultation held by the Ministry of Defence on the introduction of a voluntary screening programme for depleted uranium. MOD subsequently invited Dr. Busby to become a member of the DUOB in September 2001.
Mr. Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether members of the armed forces serving in the Gulf will be given similarly-based vaccines to those used in the first Gulf War; and if he will cease the use of depleted uranium shells. [108977]
Dr. Moonie [holding answer 14 April 2003]: United Kingdom Service personnel are offered a range of immunisations to protect against disease. These include standard Service immunisations, immunisations for deployment to areas with specific health hazards, immunisations to help protect personnel against the effects of biological weapons, and immunisations for personnel in specific occupational or 'at risk' groups. The table shows the complete list of vaccines offered for Operation GRANBY (the 19901991 Gulf Conflict) and today. Other immunisations may have been and continue to be offered on the basis of clinical need.
we have no plans to cease their use.
10 Jun 2003 : Column 765W
Next Section | Index | Home Page |