Previous Section Index Home Page


3 Jul 2003 : Column 370W—continued

Equitable Life

Annabelle Ewing: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether his Department has had discussions with the office of Lord Penrose since 8 March concerning his report into Equitable Life. [122361]

Mr. Boateng: Lord Penrose's Inquiry was established by and is supported by the Treasury. Therefore, Treasury officials discuss a range of issues with Lord Penrose's office on an on-going basis. However, the conduct of the Inquiry is entirely a matter for Lord Penrose.

European Economic Convergence

Mr. Stephen O'Brien: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the rise in the tax burden necessary to offset inflationary pressures which would otherwise result in (a) a half per cent. rise in inflation, (b) a one per cent. rise inflation, (c) a one and a half per cent. rise in inflation and (d) a two per cent. rise in inflation, assuming that a decision to implement a discretionary fiscal policy was taken, as described in the Treasury document Fiscal stabilisation and EMU, and assuming a neutral monetary policy. [121556]

3 Jul 2003 : Column 371W

Mr. Boateng: In the event that a discretionary fiscal policy response was needed within EMU, its likely size would depend on a number of factors, including the nature of the economic shock, the degree of wage and price flexibility within the UK, and which fiscal instrument was being used.

Graduate Earnings

Mr. Rendel: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the proportion of those earning over £100,000 a year who are graduates. [121770]

John Healey [holding answer 26 June 2003]: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.

Letter from Len Cook to Mr. Rendel, dated 3 July 2003:



Housing Market

Mr. Bellingham: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the potential impact on the UK housing market of increased use of long-term fixed rate mortgages; and if he will make a statement. [123200]

Mr. Boateng: These issues will be considered as part of the Miles Review announced in Budget 2003.

Mr. Stephen O'Brien: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent discussions his Department has had with mortgage lenders regarding the market share of variable rate mortgages in the UK. [121551]

Mr. Boateng: The Chancellor has asked David Miles, Professor of Finance at Imperial College, to undertake a review of the UK's fixed rate mortgage market to establish why the share of fixed-rate mortgages, particularly long-term fixed rates, is so low compared to the United States and many other EU countries.

The Review process will involve consultation with key stakeholders to establish views and inform the analysis.

Professor Miles will deliver an interim report by autumn and a comprehensive report and recommendations to the Chancellor by Budget 2004.

Income Tax

Mr. McNamara: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the cost would be to the Exchequer if the 22 per cent. income tax rate bracket was increased to include individuals with yearly incomes of (a) £40,000, (b) £45,000, (c) £50,000, (d) £55,000 and (e) £60,000. [121662]

Dawn Primarolo [holding answer 26 June 2003]: The full year cost or yield of extending the basic rate limits in 2003–04 is given in the following table.

3 Jul 2003 : Column 372W

Full year cost of increasing the Basic Rate Limit toinclude individuals with annual gross income of:£ billion
(a) 40,0002.5
(b) 45,0004.5
(c) 50,0006.0
(d) 55,0007.2
(e) 60,0008.3

These estimates are based upon the 2000–01 Survey of Personal Incomes and are consistent with Budget 2003. They exclude any behavioural response to the tax change.

Mr. McNamara: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the revenue impact would be of increasing the higher income tax rate to 50 per cent. and extending the 22 per cent. income rate bracket to include yearly earnings of up to (a) £40,000, (b) £45,000 and (c) £50,000. [121664]

Dawn Primarolo [holding answer 26 June 2003]: The full year yield of extending the basic rate limits and increasing the higher income tax rate to 50 per cent. in 2003–04 is given in the following table.

Increasing the higher income tax rate to50 per cent. and Basic Rate Limit to includeindividuals with annual gross income of:Full year yield(£ billion)
(a) 40,0008.2
(b) 45,0005.2
(c) 50,0002.8

The estimates are based upon the 2000–01 Survey of Personal Incomes and are consistent with Budget 2003.

They exclude any behavioural response to the tax change.

Mr. Kidney: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the number of tax payers who would be required to pay a top rate of income tax set for this financial year at (a) £100,000 and above and (b) £150,000 and above of taxable income. [122362]

Dawn Primarolo: The information is given in the table.

Number of higher rate taxpayers in 2003–04 with taxable incomes ofNumbers in thousands
(a) £100,000 and above327
(b) £150,000 and above158

These estimates are based upon the 2000–01 Survey of Personal Incomes and are consistent with the Budget 2003.

Sue Doughty: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the revenue that would be raised from income tax rates of (a) 1 per cent., (b) 5 per cent., (c) 9 per cent. and (d) 10 per cent. on gross incomes in excess of £1,000,000 a year. [122624]

Dawn Primarolo [holding answer 30 June 2003]: The full year revenue yield from making these changes in 2003–04 is set out in the table.

3 Jul 2003 : Column 373W

Full year yield of raising the higher rate ofincome tax in 2003–04 on gross incomes inexcess of £1,000,000£ billion
(a) by 1 per cent.0.1
(b) by 5 per cent.0.3
(c) by 9 per cent.0.6
(d) by 10 per cent.0.7

These estimates are based upon the 2000–01 Survey of Personal Incomes and are consistent with Budget 2003. They exclude any behavioural response to the tax change.

Labour Statistics

Mr. David Stewart: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many employees are aged (a) 16 and (b) 17. [122879]

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.

Letter from Len Cook to Mr. David Stewart, dated 3 July 2003:



Public Appointments

Keith Vaz: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the appointees to the (a) Private Finance Task Force, (b) Financial Services Authority, (c) Financial Services Tribunal, (d) Board of Banking Supervision, (e) VAT and Duties Tribunal and (f) National Savings; and which of the appointees to each body are from ethnic minorities. [122991]

Dawn Primarolo: The Financial Services Tribunal and the Board of Banking Supervision were disbanded following the enactment of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) and the Private Finance Task Force no longer exists. Of the remaining three bodies the current appointees are listed below. As information about which appointees are from ethnic minorities is personal, it can be disclosed only with their individual approval, which would entail disproportionate cost.

(b) Financial Services Authority


3 Jul 2003 : Column 374W

(e) VAT and Duties Tribunal


3 Jul 2003 : Column 375W

3 Jul 2003 : Column 376W


Next Section Index Home Page