Previous Section Index Home Page


15 Oct 2003 : Column 278W—continued

Regeneration (Liverpool)

Mrs. Ellman: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much funding was allocated for regeneration in Liverpool in each of the last six years; and how much funding he expects will be allocated in the 2003–04 financial year. [131295]

Yvette Cooper: Liverpool has received funding allocations from the following regeneration programmes (all sums rounded to £000).

Project1997–981998–991999–20002000–012001–022002–032003–04
Single Regeneration Budget8,42412,78615,48012,69213,5002,271848
Community Empowerment Fund0000261261261
Community Chest0000332499917
Community Learning Chest00000133199
Neighbourhood Renewal Fund000010,10015,10020,134
Neighbourhood Wardens00057127457451
Estates Renewal Challenge Fund3,8007,78423,82817,960000
ERDF42,50231,39665,406024,08029,6780
New Deal for Communities0502001,0624,1715,6685,014
Housing Action Trust20,80025,00021,50017,80020,60033,31033,150

Note:European Regional Development Fund, the funding allocation is calculated by calendar year, figures for 2003–04 are not available.


Liverpool has also benefited during this period from City Challenge as well as the Estate Action and Merseyside Development Corporation programmes. It has not been possible to obtain information for these programmes in the available time.

Social Housing

Mr. Best: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what steps the Government is taking to assist in increasing the provision of social housing in Leeds North West. [132232]

Keith Hill: The Sustainable Communities plan, published earlier this year, set out our plans for increasing investment in housing up to 2005–06. It also identified the actions that we will take to improve the availability and quality of social housing, including the establishment of Regional Housing Boards with responsibility for the production of Regional Housing Strategies and to advise Ministers on the allocation of resources to meet regional priorities.

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is currently considering the Regional Housing Strategy for Yorkshire and the Humber, and its accompanying

15 Oct 2003 : Column 279W

Investment Framework, and hope to make an announcement later this month. The provision of sufficient new homes, creating mixed income and sustainable communities is one of its objectives. This is reflected in the Investment Framework, which in addition to meeting Housing Corporation commitments and pre-allocations, proposes commissioning a £51 million two-year programme from the Housing Corporation, in which one of the priorities is affordable housing in the 'Golden Triangle' of Leeds, Harrogate and York. There is also a further £10 million for the board to commission 'transformational proposals' relating to all the strategy priorities in 2005–06 from sub-regional partnerships.

Teacher Salaries

Mr. Michael Foster: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister when he last assessed the level of teacher salaries paid by local authorities; and if he will make a statement. [131369]

Mr. Miliband: I have been asked to reply.

The salaries of school teachers, including those of unattached teachers, are set in the School Teachers' Pay and Conditions Document, following the recommendations of the independent School Teachers' Review Body (STRB). It is for LEAs to determine which provisions of the document should apply to unattached teachers. The STRB is currently considering a range of evidence on unattached teachers.

TRADE AND INDUSTRY

Small Businesses

Mr. Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what plans she has to reduce regulatory burdens on small businesses. [131298]

Nigel Griffiths [holding answer 14 October 2003]: The number of regulations passed by Parliament has fallen by nearly 800, we have cut form-filling and red tape for 700,000 small businesses with the new flat rate VAT scheme; we have abolished automatic penalties for late filing of VAT and we now have the best VAT threshold in Europe for business.

The recent OECD review of EU countries shows the UK has almost the lowest administration cost and few regulations for entrepreneurs than any other EU country.

We are seeking further improvements through Regulatory Impact Assessments, 'Think Small First' and Small Business Europe which promotes better regulation.

Alsthom

Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations she has made to the (a) French authorities and (b) European Commission on French state aids in the case of Alsthom. [131968]

Ms Hewitt [holding answer 14 October 2003]: None. The European Commission has announced that it is launching a formal investigation into France's

15 Oct 2003 : Column 280W

proposals. The Commission will in due course provide member states arid third parties with an opportunity to comment. We will consider the position further when the Commission has published full details.

Coal-fired Power Stations

Mr. Grogan: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry at what load factor each coal-fired power station operated in each year from 1997 to 2003. [132403]

Mr. Timms: Information for each power station is not readily available. In total coal fired power stations in the United Kingdom owned by major power producers together operated at the following load factors:

Percentage
199748.8
199850.6
199943.8
200050.8
200155.9
200255.9

Source:

Calculated from figures given in the Digest of UK Energy Statistics 2003


Customs and Excise

Mr. Bellingham: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much money has been recovered by Her Majesty's Customs and Excise over the last six years for the costs associated with seizing and storing imported goods for inspection (a) from importers subsequently found to be legitimately importing genuine goods and (b) from businesses which are subsequently found to be importing counterfeit and illegal goods. [129387]

John Healey: I have been asked to reply. Customs have not recovered any money in either case. However, the relevant port authorities may levy such charges.

Export Credits Guarantee Department

Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much debt owing to the UK has been written-off by the Export Credits Guarantee Department in the last five years; and if she will list the countries for which the written-off debt was due, and the amounts written off for each country. [130912]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: During the period from 1 April 1998 to 31 August 2003, ECGD has written off a total of £848 million debt. The amounts written off are broken down by financial year and by market in the following table.

15 Oct 2003 : Column 281W

Amounts written off by ECGD last five financial years plus current financial year to 31 August 2003
£

Market1998–991999–20002000–012001–022002–032003–04Total
Bolivia6,160,1370011,671,3830017,831,520
Bosnia and Herzegovina3,021,121000003,021,121
Burkina Faso00001,851,73701,851,737
Cameroon5,189,3456,046,2757,387,4638,761,5998,202,1793,542,44639,129,307
Central African Republic172,07228,15727,65113,42900241 ,309
Côte d'Ivoire2,445,3060009,873,984553,72112,873,011
Democratic Republic of Congo0000113,037,774947,807113,985,581
Ethiopia0287,854532,481213,245125,63866,1851,225,403
Ghana000027,496,3193,703,40331,199,722
Guinea00707,6681,106,413772,224255,9982,842,303
Guyana011,915,740000011,915,740
Madagascar00523,1141,254,4311,126,626219,7563,123,927
Malawi00090,92084,55940,543216,022
Mali00004,215,97404,215,974
Mauritania54,307763,553545,964523,8315,305,54607,193,201
Mozambique5,692,52913,484,210071,538,5640090,715,303
Nicaragua000156,212105,51523,812285,539
Niger386,665192,5521,170,8521,203,2921,084,263532,4034,570,027
Senegal1,528,862026,25339,52348,68128,0491,671,368
Serbia and Montenegro000270,067,64500270,067,645
Sierra Leone000225,02244,8056,275276,102
Tanzania5,126,0634,477,75117,525,51292,700,68619,1670119,849,179
Togo81,4210000081,421
Uganda005,724,5370005,724,537
Zambia021,863,23216,790,09328,654,90027,384,3999,518,120104,210,744
Totals29,857,82859,059,32450,961,588488,221,095200,779,39019,438,518848,317,743

All of the recipients of the debt reduction, with the exception of Serbia and Montenegro, have received the debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative.


Next Section Index Home Page