|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
27 Oct 2003 : Column 47Wcontinued
Dr. Tonge: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs when he will reply to the letter of 15 August from the hon. Member for Richmond Park on the Judicial Trustees Act 1896. 
Mr. Lammy: The Government have no plans for further reform of defamation procedure. The Defamation Act 1996 introduced procedures to enable quicker and less costly resolution of claims. The 'summary procedure' allows straightforward cases to be dealt with without a jury; damages are limited to £10,000. The 'offer to make amends' strongly encourages a claimant to avoid a jury trial on the level of damages where the defendant admits an innocent mistake. Both these procedures were brought into effect on 28 February 2000.
Mr. Lammy: Further to my answer to the hon. Member for Arundel and South Downs (Mr. Flight), on 1 September 2003, Official Report, column 779W, the Department for Constitutional Affairs has incurred costs of £40,000 in changing the Department's name (covering email and website changes, stationery and signage). An estimated £412,000 has been incurred in respect of relocation from the House of Lords to Selborne House and all the consequential changes following on from this.
Mr. Malins: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs how many immigration appeals were heard by the Immigration Appellate Authority in the last 12 months for which figures are available; how many of those were heard (a) within six months of and (b) over 12 months after the application was refused; and if he will make a statement. 
Mr. Lammy: From the 1 October 2002 to the 30 September 2003 there have been 9,727 substantive Immigration hearings within the Immigration Appellate Authority. For the same period of time there have been 12,530 Family Visit Visa hearings (either oral or on
27 Oct 2003 : Column 48W
Huw Irranca-Davies: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs what plans he has to increase the accountability of the Legal Services Commission for its decisions on the granting of legal aid. 
Mr. Lammy: We have no plans to do so. Decisions on the granting of public funding (formerly legal aid) in civil cases are a matter for the Legal Services Commission (LSC), which is an independent body, free from political and Government influence in handling individual cases. Individuals denied funding by the LSC are entitled to have the decision reviewed by a funding review committee, an independent legal panel whose decisions on legal issues are binding on the LSC. Further, if a LSC funding decision is erroneous it may be challenged in court through judicial review.
Vera Baird: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs what the minimum fee for enforcing a judgment in the small claims court is; and whether the fees increase according to the value of the judgment. 
Mr. Lammy: The fee for enforcing a judgment is dependent on the method of enforcement chosen by the litigant. Fees do not increase according to the value of the judgment or the amount to be enforced except for a warrant of execution, which is the most common form of enforcement. The current issue fee for a warrant not exceeding £125 is £30, for a warrant exceeding this amount it is £50. The current scale of fees for enforcing judgments is contained in the County Court Fees Order 1999 as amended and is shown as follows.
...by the issue of a warrant of execution against goods except a warrant to enforce payment of a fine
(a) Where the amount for which warrant issues does not exceed £125£30
(b) Where the amount for which warrant issues exceeds £125£50
4.3 On an application for an order requiring a judgment debtor or other person to attend court to provide information in connection with enforcement of a judgment or order£40
4.4 On an application for a third party debt order or a charging order, or the appointment of a receiver by way of equitable execution£50
4.7 On an application for an attachment of earnings order (other than a consolidated attachment of earnings order) to secure payment of a judgment debt£60.
27 Oct 2003 : Column 49W
Mr. Lammy: Court staff are not legally trained. They are, however, encouraged to be as helpful as possible to customers. They should not give legal advice or advise on procedures that are outside their normal jurisdiction. The distinction between legal and procedural advice can sometimes be very fine. Where the matter is difficult or complex, the distinction may not always be easy to grasp or to explain. In such circumstances, it is wholly proper that court staff should err on the side of caution and respectfully ask court users to seek legal advice.
Mr. Lammy: As part of the Department's rolling programme of improvements to civil court procedures, a pilot exercise, from 8 July 2002 to 21 February 2003, was initiated in a number of county courts. The pilot examined whether it would be possible to allocate cases to the small claims track without the use of an allocation questionnaire. The pilot collected a considerable amount of information, which indicated areas where changes to procedures might be appropriate. The Civil Procedure Rule Committee will be considering procedural issues and the Court Service the operational issues.
Vera Baird: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs what the minimum fee chargeable by the small claims court for issuing a claim is; and what the sliding scale of fees for claims of increasing value is. 
Mr. Lammy: The minimum fee chargeable for a claim issued under the Small Claims procedure is £30. The current scale of fees for claims up to and including £5,000 is contained in the County Court Fees Order 1999 as amended and is shown as follows. The Order also makes provision for fees to be remitted in full or reduced where payment of the fee could cause financial hardship.
(a) does not exceed £300£30
(b) exceeds £300 but not £500£50
(c) exceeds £500 but not £1,000£80
(d) exceeds £1,000 but not £5,000£120
1.3 On the commencement of originating proceedings for any other remedy or relief£130
27 Oct 2003 : Column 50W
The Department of Trade and Industry, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Department for Transport work closely in promoting the Government's policy objectives for the increased use of biofuels.
Norman Baker: To ask the Prime Minister what mechanism exists to regulate individuals who are neither Ministers or civil servants but who are invited to undertake tasks for him which involve access to confidential material. 
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|