Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
30 Oct 2003 : Column 321Wcontinued
Dr. Cable: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what estimate the Cabinet Office has made of the proportion of civil servants which the senior Civil Service represents; and if he will make a statement. [134135]
30 Oct 2003 : Column 322W
Mr. Alexander: The most recent figures relating to the number of staff as at 1 April 2003 were published on 16 October 2003. These figures show that there were 542,770 permanent civil servants (Headcount basis), and of these 4,260 or 0.8 per cent. were at Senior Civil Service Level.
Dr. Cable: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many non-departmental public bodies there were in England in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement. [134549]
Mr. Alexander: Information on non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) is provided annually in the Cabinet Office publication "Public Bodies". The latest available data are contained in "Public Bodies 2003", giving information as at 31 March 2003. Copies of these publications are held in the House Libraries.
The number of NDPBs sponsored by UK Government Departments with responsibilities for England in each year was as follows:
Year | Number |
---|---|
1997 | 846 |
1998 | 837 |
1999 | 828 |
2000 | 822 |
2001 | 853 |
2002 | 773 |
2003 | 786 |
Some of these NDPBs will have a remit which extends beyond England.
Norman Baker: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office if he will list the official buildings within a mile of Parliament for which the Cabinet Office has responsibility, giving in each case the date of acquisition; whether the acquisition in each case was (a) as a result of a departmental transfer and (b) a new acquisition by the Government; and what the buildings are used for. [134419]
Mr. Alexander: The buildings are as follows:
Building | Acquisitiondate | Means of acquisition | Use |
---|---|---|---|
70 Whitehall(5) | 1996(6) | Departmental transfer | Office space and operational facilities |
36 Whitehall | 1996(6) | Departmental transfer | Office space |
53 Parliament Street | 1996(6) | Departmental transfer | Office space |
Hepburn House, Marsham Street | 1996(6) | Departmental transfer | Vacant space and transfer to another Department pending |
10 Downing Street(5) | 1996(6) | Departmental transfer | Office space, residential accommodation, state rooms |
11 Downing Street(5) | 1996(6) | Departmental transfer | Office space, residential accommodation, state rooms |
12 Downing Street | 1996(6) | Departmental transfer | Office space |
Admiralty House(5) | 1996(6) | Departmental transfer | Residential accommodation, state rooms |
11 Belgrave Road(5) | 1996(6) | Departmental transfer | Office space, training and operational facilities |
Admiralty Arch | 1998 | Departmental transfer | Office space |
22/26 Whitehall(5) | 1999 | Departmental transfer | Office space |
35 Great Smith Street(5) | 2000 | New acquisition | Office space |
Stockley House, 130 Wilton Road(5) | 2000 | Departmental transfer | Office space |
9 Whitehall | 2001 | New acquisition | Office space |
7 St. James's Square(5) | 2001 | Departmental transfer | Office space |
10 Great George Street(5) | 2001 | New acquisition | Office space and operational facilities |
2 Little Smith Street | 2001 | New acquisition | Office space |
67 Tufton Street | 2001 | New acquisition | Office space and operational facilities |
(5) The Cabinet Office does not occupy the whole of these buildings.
(6) All of the properties acquired by the Cabinet Office in 1996 were transferred when responsibility for buildings was delegated to Departments from the then Property Services Agency.
30 Oct 2003 : Column 323W
Sandra Gidley: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what proportion of ministerial appointments to public bodies in each year since 1997 were of (a) men and (b) women; and what proportion of public appointments were held by women in each year since 1997. [134682]
Mr. Alexander: Information is provided annually in the Cabinet Office publication "Public Bodies". The latest available data is contained in "Public Bodies 2003", giving information as at 31 March 2003. Copies of these publications are held in the House Libraries.
These show that the number and proportion of men and women holding ministerial appointments in public bodies were as follows:
Men | Women | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Number | Per cent. | Number | Per cent. |
1997 | 22,068 | 67 | 10,728 | 33 |
1998 | 20,676 | 66 | 10,487 | 34 |
1999 | 19,693 | 65 | 10,526 | 35 |
2000 | 17,303 | 66 | 9,106 | 34 |
2001 | 16,743 | 66 | 9,106 | 34 |
2001 | 16,743 | 65 | 9,106 | 35 |
2002 | 14,510 | 66 | 7,391 | 34 |
2003 | 14,436 | 64 | 8,028 | 36 |
Data on non-ministerial appointments have not been collected since 2001.
Sir Robert Smith: To ask the Prime Minister when he will reply to the letter from Sir Ian Wood and Mr. Paul Blakeley of 22 October regarding the impact of the draft EU constitution on investment in the exploitation of North Sea oil and gas reserves; and if he will place a copy of the reply in the Library. [R] [135324]
The Prime Minister: The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs has replied today on my behalf. A copy has been placed in the Library of the House.
John Mann: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what recent guidance she has given to (a) the Football Premier League and (b) UK Sport on the deterrent use of maximum bans for breaches of drug testing regulations. [135312]
Mr. Caborn: The Government have given no advice to the Football Premier League and UK Sport on doping sanctions.
30 Oct 2003 : Column 324W
This is a matter for UK Sport and sport's governing bodies. The UK's national anti-doping policy is in line with the International Standard for Doping Control which requires the governing bodies to carry out a robust in-and-out of competition dope testing programme. Governing bodies are responsible for imposing sanctions where an athlete has been found to have committed a doping offence. Sanctions should be in line with the regulations set out by the governing body or international federation which will comply with the rules of the British Olympic Association or Commonwealth Games Associations.
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what representations the Government have made to the International Olympic Committee on an Olympic team from Burma taking part in the Athens games in 2004; and if she will make a statement. [134719]
Tessa Jowell: The Government have not made any representations to the International Olympic Committee regarding the participation of Myanmar in the 2004 Olympic Games in Athens. It remains the Government's view that the Olympic Games is a non-political event.
The hon. Member for Portsmouth, South may be interested to note that the EU Common Position on Myanmar includes a visa ban on regime members. This would mean that senior regime members would not be able to attend the Games in Athens.
Mr. Laurence Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport when she intends to introduce legislation to change the status of the Tote; and if she will make a statement. [134990]
Mr. Caborn: We intend to bring the necessary legislation forward when parliamentary time allows.
Mr. Keetch: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how the pay and conditions offered to members of the reserve forces differs from those offered to members of the regular forces; and if he will make a statement. [134917]
Mr. Caplin: When called out for full-time service, reservists receive the same rates of pay and are generally entitled to the same allowances as their regular counter-parts. However, unlike regular soldiers, reservists may also claim financial assistance if their civilian earnings are greater than their military pay. They are also entitled to a tax-free call-out gratuity of £420.
30 Oct 2003 : Column 325W
When called-out, reservists are paid the full 13 per cent. X-factor (training pay only includes 5 per cent. X-factor). The X-factor takes account of the relative disadvantages of conditions of service experienced by members of the armed forces compared with those in civilian life.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |