Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
3 Nov 2003 : Column 391Wcontinued
Lady Hermon: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, what countries use the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council as their final court of appeal; how many cases have been heard by the Judicial Committee from each of these countries in each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement. [134824]
3 Nov 2003 : Column 392W
Mr. Leslie: The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is the final court of appeal for the independent Commonwealth countries listed in the first column of the table, as well as for the United Kingdom overseas territories and Crown dependencies. The table shows the number of appeals from the countries concerned disposed of by the Judicial Committee in each of the five years up to 2002. Some of these appeals were disposed of without a hearing.
Country | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antigua and Barbuda | 2 | | 1 | 2 | | 5 |
The Bahamas | 4 | 2(1) | 3 | 3(1) | 5 | 17(2) |
Barbados | | 2(1) | | 2 | | 4(1) |
Belize | 4(1) | 2(1) | 1(1) | 3(1) | 1 | 11(4) |
Brunei(1) | 2 | | | | | 2 |
Dominica | | | 2(1) | | 1 | 3(1) |
Grenada | 2 | | 1 | 4(1) | 2 | 9(1) |
Jamaica | 9 | 7(1) | 10 | 4 | 8(1) | 38(2) |
Kiribati(2) | | | | | | |
Mauritius | 3 | 3 | 4(1) | 2(1) | 3(1) | 15(3) |
New Zealand(3) | 6(1) | 10(4) | 8(2) | 16(3) | 14(1) | 54(11) |
St. Christopher and Nevis | | 1 | | 1 | 2 | 4 |
St. Lucia | | 1 | 3(2) | | 2 | 6(2) |
St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2 | | 4(1) | 1 | 1(1) | 8(2) |
Trinidad and Tobago | 8 | 15(1) | 8(1) | 8(1) | 14(3) | 53(6) |
Tuvalu | | | | | | |
(1) An appeal lies from the Court of Appeal of Brunei to the Sultan and Yang di-Pertuan, in civil cases only. By agreement between Her Majesty and the Sultan these appeals are heard by the Judicial Committee who report their opinion to him instead of to Her Majesty.
(2) The appeal lies only in constitutional cases affecting a Banaban.
(3) New Zealand has recently legislated to abolish the appeal for all cases heard by the Court of Appeal of New Zealand after the end of 2003.
Note:
Figures in brackets (included in the total annual figure given) are for appeals disposed of without a hearing. These were mostly dismissed for non-prosecution or withdrawn.
Vera Baird: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs what action he has taken to remove circuit judges from the list of those permitted to try rape cases in the last two years. [134939]
Mr. Leslie : Section 75 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 states that the Lord Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, can, by means of a practice direction, determine the cases or classes of cases suitable for allocation to High Court Judges, Circuit Judges and Recorders. From time to time successive Lord Chief Justices have issued such practice directions. In October 2001, the current Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf, issued a practice direction entitled 'Directions by the Lord Chief Justice for the Classification of the business of the Crown Court and Allocation to Crown Court Centres'. This Practice Direction again determined that all High Court Judges and those Circuit Judges and Recorders, approved for that purpose by the Senior Presiding Judge, with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice, can hear rape cases.
Judges trying rape cases are, of course, under constant public scrutiny. Where problems about judicial conduct become apparent to the Court of Appeal, the papers are referred to the relevant Presiding Judge, or to the Senior Presiding Judge personally. Any complaints, as well as any information suggesting possible inappropriate judicial behaviour, are immediately investigated, and reports in the media of judicial behaviour which, if correct, would give rise to concern, are checked for correctness and completeness by the Presiding Judges. It is, of course, open to the Lord Chief Justice, acting on his own initiative, or on the recommendation of the Senior Presiding Judge, to remove any individual authorisation. The Lord Chief Justice has not had occasion to do this in the last two years.
Linda Gilroy: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what recent discussions she has had with clearing banks about the need to ensure their services are accessible to people who wish to conduct their business on a face-to-face basis and the role which post offices and sub-post offices can play in achieving this. [135016]
Mr. Timms: None. This is a commercial matter for the banks. Banking and other financial services are central to the Post Office's strategy for the future of the network. With almost 17,000 offices, Post Office Ltd has one of the largest retail networks of any organisation in Europe and the Government's investment of £480 million on computerising the post office network means that the Post Office can achieve a new role as a convenient place for people to do their banking
Universal banking services which successfully went live on 1 April, and these services together with Post Office Ltd's plans for an expansion of network banking
3 Nov 2003 : Column 393W
(commercial arrangements between the Post Office and individual banks providing access to standard bank accounts at post office counters) should lead to a substantial increase in the number of people using post offices for banking transactions.
Mr. Bellingham: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what steps her Department is taking to protect the interests of consumers from copy protected music CDs. [133410]
Ms Hewitt: Rights owners must be able to use technology to protect their works against unauthorised copying and be free to issue their products, such as music CDs, in copy-protected format. However, these
3 Nov 2003 : Column 394W
products should be identifiable as such, and we welcome music industry guidelines which recommend clear labelling as regards compatibility with various types of consumer equipment on which the CDs could be expected to be playable.
Mr. Tynan: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will list, for each of the last five years, applications for construction of new electricity generation capacity for which her approval has been (a) sought and (b) given, broken down by (i) type, (ii) size and (iii) proposed or actual in-service date. [132433]
Mr. Timms: The following is the information requested:
Application | Applied | Approved | Size(MW) | Type | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raventhorpe | 8 May 1998 | 15 November 2000 | 450 | CCGT | Not built |
Isle of Grain | 18 May 1998 | 15 November 2000 | 1,200 | CCGT | Not built |
Langage | 9 June 1998 | 15 November 2000 | 1,010 | CCGT | Not yet started |
Stoke-on-Trent | 28 September 1998 | 14 May 1999 | 58 | CHP GT | Not available |
Cantley | 3 February 1999 | 9 December 1999 | 70 | CHP GT | Not available |
Beglan Bay | 23 April 1999 | 16 July 1999 | 525 | CCGT | 2003 |
Belvedere | 29 September 1999 | | 70 | Wates | Public inquiry |
South Killingholme | 23 November 2000 | 22 March 2001 | 700 | CHP CCGT | 2003 |
Halewood | 29 August 2000 | 4 April 2001 | 70 | CHP GT | Not available |
Trafford Park | 15 September 2000 | 10 May 2001 | 65 | CHP GT | Not available |
Avonmouth | 19 October 2000 | 14 September 2001 | 180 | CHP GT | Not built |
Cefn Croes | 24 July 2000 | 23 May 2002 | 60 | Onshore | Not yet started |
Heathrow Airport | 2 January 2001 | | 65 | CHP GT | To be decided |
Carrington | 5 February 2001 | 18 July 2002 | 65 | CHP GT | Not available |
Scroby Sands | 5 March 2001 | 17 April 2002 | 78 | Offshore | Under construction |
Sheffield | 25 April 2001 | | 65 | CHP GT | To be decided |
Marchwood | 8 November 2001 | 28 November 2002 | 860 | CCGT | Not yet started |
Hatfield Colliery | 9 April 2001 | 5 August 2003 | 430 | Coal IGCC | Not yet started |
North Hoyle | 18 February 2002 | 31 July 2002 | 90 | Offshore | Under construction |
Rhyl Fiats | 25 March 2002 | 12 December 2002 | 150 | Offshore | Not yet started |
Barrow | 31 May 2002 | 10 March 2003 | 108 | Offshore | Not yet started |
Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what contingency plans her Department has to prevent power failures in the United Kingdom. [134126]
Mr. Timms: I would refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to her on Tuesday 14 October 2003, Official Report, column 118W.
Mr. Nigel Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what steps she is taking to ensure continuity of electricity supply; and if she will assess the likely effect on companies and individuals of widespread power cuts. [134236]
Mr. Timms: I would refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for the Vale of York on Tuesday 14 October 2003, Official Report, column 118W.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |