Previous Section Index Home Page


11 Nov 2003 : Column 181W—continued

Ministerial Visits

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the visits made by Ministers in his Department in each of the last five years, broken down by constituency. [136913]

Mr. Caplin: This information is not held centrally and can be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Procurement Costs

Mr. Keetch: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the average cost was of procuring (a) each

11 Nov 2003 : Column 182W

Eurofighter Typhoon, (b) one Challenger II battle tank, (c) one Type 45 destroyer, (d) one Astute submarine and (e) one Nimrod aeroplane. [136809]

Mr. Ingram [holding answer 10 November 2003]: Unit production costs (UPC) for major equipment programmes, where these are practical to construct, can be found within the information given in the Ministry of Defence Major Projects Report (MPR). Those figures are estimated in accordance to methodology agreed with the National Audit Office (NAO). The NAO expect to publish their MPR 2003 in December and copies will be available as normal in the Library of the House.

Current estimated unit production costs for the projects listed are as follows:

ProgrammeCommentMPR UPC (£ million)
TyphoonMPR 0356.8
Challenger II battle tankChallenger II last appeared in the MPR in 2000 as delivery concluded in FY 2001–023.7
Type 45 destroyerMPR 03. (Includes PAAMS missile systems)552.7
Astute class submarineThe current estimated total resource cost for the three boats on contract of £3.6 billion includes design, development and other costs specific to a first of class. These costs would not be attributable to further buys should any subsequent orders be made. The National Audit Office has agreed that a it would be misleading to produce a UPC for Astute at this stage.
Nimrod MRA4No UPC is provided in the MPR, however an indicative figure has been given here. For Nimrod MRA4, a significant part of the Agreement with BAE Systems announced on 19 February by the Minister for Defence Procurement was the separation of production from design and development until we have seen demonstrated performance from the first three aircraft used for flight trials. The indicative production cost of Nimrod MRA4 will thereafter be influenced by the outcome of these design and development results, timing of build and appropriate contractual negotiations.60

It should be noted that unit production costs are on a resource account basis and exclude development costs.

Recruitment

Mr. McNamara: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many people were recruited to each of HM armed forces in the most recent year for which figures are available, broken down by region. [137502]

Mr. Caplin: I refer my hon. Friend to the answers I gave on 17 September 2003, Official Report, column 754W, and 29 October 2003, Official Report, columns 222–27W, to the hon. Member for Moray (Angus Robertson).

Secondments

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many civil servants in his Department are seconded to other (a) Governments, (b) organisations and (c) companies; to which; for how long; and if he will make a statement. [136522]

Mr. Caplin: Information available on Ministry of Defence civil servants seconded to other Governments is not held centrally. As at 3 November 2003 personnel currently seconded from the Department to companies and organisations is outlined in the following two tables:

Outward secondments to companies

CompanyNumber of personnel secondedStart dateEnd Date
LogicaCMG1April 2002April 2004
Rolls Royce PLC1July 2002July 2004
Thales, France1July 2002July 2004
Admiral1July 2002July 2004
Atomic Weapons Establishment1August 2002August 2004
BAE Systems2November 2002November 2003
January 2003January 2004
Lloyds Register1November 2002November 2004
March 2003March 2005

Outward secondments to organisations

OrganisationNumber of personnel secondedStart dateEnd Date
United Kingdom Council for Electronic Business1June 2002December 2003
Employment Opportunity Now1July 2002July 2004
The Princes Trust1August 2002August 2004
Civil Service Sports Council, Sports and Leisure1August 2002August 2005
Defence Industries Council1September 2002September 2004
Royal Institute of International Affairs1September 2002September 2004
Forum for the Future1October 2002October 2004
Bromley by Bow Centre1October 2002November 2004
Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities2December 2002December 2004
Bromley Primary Health Care Trust1January 2003January 2006
The Princes Trust2April 2003 April 2006
August 2003August 2005

11 Nov 2003 : Column 183W

Submarines (Radiation)

Mr. Peter Duncan: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence to what type of radiation (a) submariners and (b) radiation workers are exposed when they leave radiation-controlled areas on board submarines. [137697]

Mr. Caplin: Both submariners and radiation workers leaving radiation-controlled areas may be exposed to very low levels of gamma and neutron radiation on board the submarine, if the reactor is operating. The construction of the submarine, and controls on occupancy of all areas, ensure that the amount of such radiation received by personnel is below Ministry of Defence's self-imposed limits, which are themselves well below all legal limits. If the reactor is shut down, the gamma and neutron radiation falls to natural background radiation levels.

Territorial Army

Mr. Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many resignations from the Territorial Army have been tendered in each of the past 10 years; and how many have been received in 2003 to date. [137726]

Mr. Caplin [holding answer 10 November 2003]: Data are not held centrally on the number of tendered resignations from the Territorial Army prior to 1998. Once the information from 1998 onwards has been collated, I will write to the hon. Member and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

Unmanned Aircraft

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much his Department spent on research on unmanned aircraft in each of the last 10 years. [137339]

Mr. Ingram: The Ministry of Defence has a long-established research programme into Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), with a total of approximately £40 million invested over the past 10 years. The figures for annual expenditure on this research programme are provided in the table.

It should, however, be noted that these figures detail the expenditure on UAV-specific research only: research into technologies such as aerodynamics, stealth and sensors is of relevance to UAVs but has a wide range of applications.

Spend (£ million)
1994–95(5)1.0
1995–96(5)1.0
1996–97(5)1.0
1997–98(5)1.0
1998–992.1
1999–20003.7
2000–015.1
2001–025.1
2002–0310.8
2003–0410.4

(5) Estimate figures—no exact data available.


11 Nov 2003 : Column 184W

US Military Helicopters

Mr. Ross: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what United States of America military helicopters are based in the UK. [137387]

Mr. Ingram [holding answer 10 November 2003]: The MH-53M Pave Low is the only United States military helicopter based in the United Kingdom. Seven of these aircraft are currently based at RAF Mildenhall in Suffolk.

TRADE AND INDUSTRY

Cross-border Mergers

Mr. Bellingham: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will make a statement on EU proposals on (a) union consultation and (b) board room representation in cross-border mergers. [137422]

Mr. Sutcliffe: The European Commission has not yet made any new proposals for an EC directive regarding cross-border mergers.

Depleted Uranium

Llew Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what health protection measures are in place at aircraft manufacturing plants where depleted uranium counter weights are installed in aircraft wings. [136720]

Mr. Browne: I have been asked to reply.

Work with depleted uranium is governed by the Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999 (IRR99) enforced by the Health and Safety Executive and any employer working with depleted uranium has duties under those regulations.

The use of depleted uranium as a counter weight installed in aircraft wings presents little radiological risk and so few, if any health protection measures are required by the IRR99. It is only when the depleted uranium is machined or in some way dispersed as a dust that, because it can be inhaled or ingested, it presents any significant radiological risk. The IRR99 would then require protection measures such as adequate local ventilation and/or the use of appropriate respiratory protection and protective clothing to minimise those risks.

11 Nov 2003 : Column 185W


Next Section Index Home Page