Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses(Questions 20-31)

MR CHARLES ALLEN, MS FRANCES DONE, MR DAVID LEATHER AND MR HOWARD BERNSTEIN

WEDNESDAY 11 DECEMBER 2002

  20. What sorts of things are you hoping to do?
  (Mr Bernstein) One of the things which we encouraged, again through Frances and some of the legacy work, Spirit of Friendship festival, was the development of links between different schools and different nations throughout the North West region. We know certainly in other parts of Greater Manchester, particularly Rochdale, where those links are flourishing even more today than perhaps they were several months ago. So we see all of that as being a continuing process which we are only too happy to support and encourage.

  21. But did the fact that the World Cup was taking place a little bit too close to the Commonwealth Games make it difficult for you with publicity? I think we talked about that in an earlier session.
  (Mr Allen) We did, and we were anxious about it, in terms of would you get sports burn-out; actually, we got the opposite, because the BBC marketed it as a summer sport. We built a very close relationship with the BBC. Wearing my day job hat, we know them very well and we are also competitors, but actually we have got a very close relationship there, because it was quite key to market it as a summer sport, rather than the sense, the football is over and therefore there is nothing to look forward to. So actually it worked incredibly well for them, and they got fantastic ratings, nine million viewers for the opening ceremony, it is the only opening ceremony that got that volume and actually built every 15 minutes, which is unheard of in terms of any of these Games.
  (Mr Leather) If I can just add to that, I think probably there were two areas where it did impact negatively, and that was with certain companies who had invested very heavily in the World Cup, it was then very difficult to attract them to the Commonwealth Games for sponsorship, and some of those companies we only got on board very, very late in the day. And the other area was probably merchandising, because World Cup merchandise was everywhere, it was very difficult to interest people in our merchandise until really the World Cup had died down. And of course many of the stores that might have stocked our merchandise were more interested in the World Cup because they perceived that had a bigger commercial return to them. So a couple of negatives there.

  22. Finally, who was it thought up the rain ceremony, who gets credit for that?
  (Mr Allen) It depends which rain ceremony, the one we meant or the one we did not mean, in the closing ceremony. There were two rain ceremonies.
  (Ms Done) We have repositioned rain, the rain for Manchester anyway.
  (Mr Allen) We did not call it rain, we called it a water ballet, so we had a water ballet at the end of the Games.

  23. Congratulations again.
  (Mr Allen) Can I just record our thanks to yourself, actually, in helping us manage the relationship with Heathrow Airport. That was very, very useful indeed, in terms of having them as a partner and coming on board. So I would just like to record our personal thanks to you; that was very helpful.

Chairman

  24. Mr Leather mentioned merchandising, and the witnesses will know that that has been a preoccupation of mine throughout, and, in fact, the material you produced in the end, particularly the shirts, turned out to be collectors' items. One thing that I do disagree with in the material you have sent me was the view that it was only in the run-up to the Commonwealth Games that merchandising became an attractive proposition. Now I grant you immediately that it was only fairly shortly before the Games that the buzz went round and that people felt that a really big thing was going to happen. On the other hand, when this Committee went to Australia at the beginning of 1999, and it was from the report after that that resulted the appointment of Mr McCartney and the structure that was so successful, at the beginning of '99, when I was in Sydney, they had Olympic Games shops open in Sydney and they were crowded, and at Sydney Airport as well. Now, as I say, I am not diminishing the fact that the Commonwealth Games are different, but then again these Commonwealth Games were different from other Commonwealth Games, and they were a much bigger and more publicised event. Given your time over again, would you have started merchandising sooner?
  (Mr Allen) I think David made a very good point. The problem is the mental shelf-space, if you like. Retailers will not start considering it until they know it is live, and the problem we suffered from was "Is this going to be a big event or not?" And even after the opening ceremony we had a number of doubters, saying, "I don't know if it's going to be successful." It is amazing the number of people who now come up to me and remind me how successful they always thought it was going to be. But the two and a half years when we had certainly the Chairman's support, in terms of what we were doing, we were pretty much alone in that area. I think a couple of lessons. Coming directly after the football was unhelpful, and still people's perception of what this might be was quite different. I think people know what the Olympics will be, they did not know what this was going to be. And in some ways that was helpful, because we were able to exceed their expectations because we knew what we could deliver, but in areas such as you have talked about it was less helpful. I think the performance of the team needs to be put in context. This was the most successful merchandising for any Commonwealth Games ever. And I think some of the points that you asked to look at last time when we saw you were actually very helpful in steering us in the right direction, in terms of moving it forward. So I think the honest answer is that, yes, you can always do better, but would it be materially different, probably not, actually. I think for the next Games then they have the opportunity to build on what we have done and label it as a global event. And the thing that always amazed me was the number of pins sold, they became a currency, it was an incredible volume that we were selling. David, do you want to add to that?
  (Mr Leather) Yes. I agree with everything you have said about the value of the Olympic brand, and therefore it was easier to establish merchandise in the market-place. You encouraged us, in fact, to open stores earlier, we did open three stores, they were all in the North West, one at the Arndale, in the town centre, one at the airport and one at the Trafford Centre; and we looked at opening other stores. Firstly, we found it difficult to encourage licensees, if you like, to take the risk of stocking up; and secondly we did find that, only perhaps six weeks, two months out from the Games, sales in those stores, even in the North West, were actually quite slow. So I think if we had been encouraged by greater sales in those stores we would have pushed the boat further and perhaps come further south, if you like, to open up additional stores. But with the experience that we had and the resistance and the reluctance of licensees to risk investing in stock, we kept it to just those three stores.

  25. Another issue is sponsorship. If you go into the Olympic Museum on the lakeside at Lausanne and you walk in, what faces you is a huge wall on which the Olympic idea of sponsorship is symbolised by a list, a huge wall covered with a list of Olympic sponsors. Now before you people took over there was only one sponsor, and it is clear that the sponsorship was very, very important in terms of the financial viability of the Games. Are there any lessons to be learned? I remember you had that event at 10 Downing Street, where the Prime Minister had an event for sponsors. Is not one of the lessons that (a) advance work has got to be much more effective and committed, and, two, this is yet another lesson that, although Commonwealth Games, Olympic Games, whatever, are localised in a particular city, national support and national promotion is indispensable?
  (Mr Allen) I think the big issue, one of the biggest challenges for us, as we came together as a team, was with sponsors, we had one, effectively, at that point in time. And the key issue that people asked was, "Is it going to happen, and is it going to be successful?" So until you had the funding in place, the structure in place, an overt Government partnership with Manchester City Council in place, then that was a barrier to success. Having said that, looking at the performance in context, this is the worst advertising and sponsorship recession for the last 20 years; it is my day job, so I know.

  26. Where did you get that experience, Mr Allen?
  (Mr Allen) But actually I think what we put in place was a very hard-nosed sales process that identified not only the people who could provide the money but the type of sponsors that would actually give global appeal. So it is not only about getting somebody who can write the cheque, it is about somebody who can exploit it, so things like getting Cadbury's on board, and then fully funding £3.8 million, the whole baton relay was quite key and quite an important part of the sponsorship proposition. As Frances said, although there were a number of cultural things, we actually sat down and said, "Eleven days of sport will not give us enough of a commercial proposition," so we had to create a new commercial product that had an educational element, that had a sports element, that had a youth element, that had the baton relay. So stage one was creating that product, and then, having done that, a very hard-nosed sales approach to actually going out and finding those international sponsors of the quality of Cadbury's, or Microsoft, those international players, as well as what we had in the beginning, which were local sponsors. So I think the team did a good job. The thing that would have helped is if we had been able to say earlier we had the funding in place and it was going to be successful, that early commitment, it goes back to one of the points the Chairman has made, because that early commitment is crucial to the whole commercial success.

  27. I suppose that, in fact, the success of the Manchester Games will make it easier for Melbourne to get the sponsorship?
  (Mr Allen) Absolutely. I think some of the sponsors that we had are already in discussions with Melbourne.

  28. As I understand it, when the Games actually were on, businesses and organisations were coming to you at that point and saying "Can we be sponsors?"?
  (Mr Allen) The only mistake we made was we should have got some commission for this.

  29. One other thing, (-inaudible -) apart from the least important thing, financial outturn. There was a real fear, was there not, in advance of the Games, that the financial outturn would be such as to impose a huge burden on Manchester council taxpayers, and indeed there were certain people waiting around almost hoping that that would happen. In the end, that did not happen at all. To what extent was that due to the commitment that Gordon Brown made, not just simply for the opening and closing ceremonies, that was very important, but the financial underpinning of the Games by the national Government?
  (Mr Allen) I think that was crucial to the overall success of the Games. Because with that underpinning it allowed us to be more confident with our sponsors, and it allowed us to put in place a policy that had sort of full stadium with fair prices. That ability to know that you had that then allowed us to have policies that I think ensured that the Games were financially successful. And, David, I do not know whether you want to comment further on the financial side, in terms of the overall position.
  (Mr Leather) I think we adopted a very robust financial management process prior to and during the Games, and in fact the contingencies monies that committed £9.3 million out of the £25 million, that commitment was all made prior to the Games, not because we were experiencing problems or because costs were running out of control but because we had made decisions to improve service levels in areas like the athletes' village and transport and security. And actually during the Games we managed to come in under budget on the majority of expenditure headings, so it was a good result overall.

Rosemary McKenna

  30. I want to congratulate you as well, because it was fantastic, and I am very glad you learned the lessons of the Edinburgh Games. I was also in at the Victoria Games, which were extremely successful, and I think that was where the lessons of the volunteers came from, because they were superb. So it was excellent. I just wanted to ask Mr Allen one thing, and that is, have the Scottish Executive been in touch with you to give them any assistance in their joint bid with Ireland for the Football World Cup, sorry, the European?
  (Mr Allen) Actually I met the First Minister, who came to the Games, and they were very keen to learn lessons, so there have been people from the Executive who actually have talked to the organisers, in terms of lessons to be learned. And we were very open, in terms of, like the volunteers, some of the key lessons we have learned, in sharing that, and we have actually got quite a detailed pack that can help people, but also we have got several people in place that we have encouraged them to talk to.

  Rosemary McKenna: That is excellent. I am very pleased to hear that. Thank you.

Mr Doran

  31. Will you be charging a commission for this?
  (Mr Allen) You have given me an idea.

  Chairman: I would like to thank you very much. I think that one symbol of the success of the Games is the absence of frantic press coverage here today. Whenever we do anything about Wembley we cannot provide enough room on the press table. And it may well be that even the Manchester Evening News, which participated very much, will report our report when we publish it. Thank you very much indeed, and once again congratulations.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 16 January 2003