Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Third Report


II INTRODUCTION

The inquiry

· We decided on 17 December 2002 to hold a short inquiry into the Government's decision­making process on whether to support a London bid for the 2012 Olympic Games. Over 14 and 15 January we took oral evidence from: Mr Mark Bostock, Project Director, Mr Sam Higginson, Project Manager, and Mr Nick Banks, Senior Consultant, Arup; four London boroughs, Mr Max Caller, Chief Executive of Hackney, Mr Simon White, Chief Executive of Waltham Forest, Mr Norman Turner, Director of Culture and Leisure, Newham and Mr Ray Gerlach, Corporate Director of Customer Services, Tower Hamlets; Mr Craig Reedie, member of the International Olympic Committee (IOC); Mr Reedie also appeared subsequently in his separate role as Chairman of the British Olympic Association (BOA), accompanied by Mr Simon Clegg, Chief Executive, Sir Steven Redgrave, Vice-President, and Mr David Luckes, London Olympic Bid Co-ordinator; Rt Hon Tessa Jowell MP, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, Rt Hon Richard Caborn MP, Minister for Sport and Mr Robert Raine, Head of Commonwealth Games Division, Department for Culture, Media and Sport; Mr Richard Sumray, the Mayor's representative on the 2012 Olympic Bid Stakeholders Group, Greater London Authority (GLA), Mr Tony Winterbottom, Director of Strategy Implementation and Project Development and Mr Michael Ward, Chief Executive, London Development Agency (LDA), Mr Jay Walder, Managing Director, Finance and Planning and Mr Barry Broe, Director of Strategic Planning, Transport for London; Sir Rodney Walker, Chairman, and Mr John Scott, Director of International Relations and Major Events, UK Sport and Mr Roger Draper, Acting Chief Executive, and Mr Ian Fytche, Director of Strategy, Sport England.[1]

· We were grateful to our witnesses, and those who submitted written memoranda, for their efforts at relatively short notice.[2] We sought evidence from the Organising Committee of the Athens 2004 Games but unfortunately this could not be arranged within the time available.

· To achieve expeditious publication of our conclusions, all the written evidence we received—apart from that submitted in confidence—is published together at the back of this volume after the oral evidence. The transcripts of the oral evidence have been available on the Parliamentary website since 16 January.[3]

The Olympic Movement and the Olympic and Paralympic Games

· The Olympic Movement brings together all those who agree to be guided by the Olympic Charter and who recognise the authority of the International Olympic Committee (IOC): the international federations of Olympic sports; the national Olympic committees and associations; ad hoc organising committees (such as Athens 2004); athletes and other sports men and women; judges, umpires and referees; associations and clubs; as well as other partner organisations and institutions recognised by the IOC. The IOC itself, established in 1894, is an international, independent, non­governmental, non­profit making organisation owning all rights to the Olympic symbols, flag, motto, anthem and Olympic Games. Its main responsibility is oversight of the organisation of summer and winter Games, a process which includes selection of the host city. By agreement between the IOC and the International Paralympic Committee (IPC), the Olympic and Paralympic competitions are hosted each Olympiad by the same city.

· The modern Olympic and Paralympic Games are one of the largest regular international gatherings of any kind in the world, let alone the sporting world. For athletes, and for host cities, it is sport's richest prize. It is also the most expensive.

Host city, date and cost — £m 2002 prices[4]
Munich
1972
1,430
Atlanta
1996
1,481
Montreal
1976
2,436
Sydney
2000
2,534
Moscow
1980
2,622
Athens
2004
3,937
LA
1984
567
Beijing
2008
9,775
Seoul
1988
3,746
  
Barcelona
1992
8,057
London
2012
2,614[5]

The Games together involve about 15,000 athletes and an almost equal number of coaches, officials and members of the 'Olympic family'. Twenty thousand media representatives, 7,000 thousand sponsors and, of course, the equivalent of nearly 500,000 spectators a day are also likely to attend.[6] In the background about 60,000 operational personnel will be working to keep everything running smoothly. This event is awarded, seven years in advance, by the IOC to the Candidate City which puts forward what the 126 active IOC members vote to be the best bid against a range of criteria.



1   See Ev 1-50 Back

2   See Ev 51ff Back

3   http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmcumeds.htm Back

4   The comparisons are approximate. Some cities have incorporated infrastructure costs in their Olympic expenditure and others have not. For Barcelona and Beijing (planned) the figures include substantial associated development and redevelopment across the cities concerned. Exchange rates and purchasing price parity issues also apply-at London prices the Sydney Games would have cost about £3,248 million. See Ev 53.  Back

5   This is the Arup baseline forecast (using Mills Mead village and athletics stadium legacy options and without discounting). The latest DCMS estimate for total cost, at 2002 prices, is £3,822 million.  Back

6   From London Olympics 2012, Costs and Benefits, Arup, 21 May 2002, published summary, November 2002, p2 - hereafter "The Arup summary". Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 23 January 2003