Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 8

Memorandum submitted by Mr Max Caller, Chief Executive of the London Borough of Hackney

10. Thank you for inviting me here to give evidence on behalf of the London Borough of Hackney. The prospect of a bid for a UK Olympics based in East London raises a number of issues for Hackney. Largely these centre on community benefits and disbenefits and the impact on our local economy.

11. While we hope such a venture could benefit the UK as a whole and leave a lasting legacy of regeneration for East London, we believe that these benefits can only be realised locally if the Government's decision to host the 2012 Olympics is swiftly followed by a schedule of regeneration, transport and infrastructure schemes drawn up with stakeholders. These schemes need to include the delivery of an underground Crossrail 2. Additionally if the bid is to be made then there should be no room for important initiatives being abandoned or further delayed should the bid not be successful. This should reduce the potential for planning blight to hit the east of London whilst the bid is being considered.

12. We are aware that other areas, from Barcelona to Sydney, that have successfully bid to host the Olympics, have benefited from significant new infrastructure not just in the field of sports but also in terms of transport, housing, and new public services. Urban design standards have also tended to be higher in larger co­ordinated developments than in more piecemeal development and there have also been economic benefits, especially in relation to inward investment.

13. The East of London as part of the Thames Gateway area has been identified by Government as a region of the country that can help sustain the national economy and through the development of brownfield sites, provide more housing and jobs and contribute to an urban renaissance. The development of sites such as the Stratford rail lands are already beginning to work towards this agenda and proper preparation for the Olympics can go a great way further in assisting to deliver this. By creating the infrastructure necessary for the Olympics we can at the same time create the infrastructure needed to grow east London.

14. We are however also concerned that proposals could potentially have a negative impact and create planning blight for Hackney if not addressed with imagination and early infrastructure wins.

15. The issues for Hackney centre primarily on transport and economy as well as those of sport and leisure. The major direct impact for us is for the area called Hackney Wick where there are considerations to place sporting events and athletes housing and I will explain the key issues here.

16. As I am sure you are all aware, the London Borough of Hackney like our neighbours Newham and Tower Hamlets is one of the poorest areas in the UK and has many deep rooted problems.

17. However there are some issues for Hackney that set us apart from our neighbours. Given that we are an inner London Borough next to the City, our unemployment rate, the highest in London, is staggeringly high at nine per cent (UK level is 3.2 per cent) and our only large employers are public sector agencies. Our economy is mainly made up of micro businesses that currently have few opportunities to expand to become small to medium enterprises within the borough. Given our proximity to central London it is perhaps surprising that Hackney does not have any direct links to the London Underground. We believe that these two issues are linked and that both can be assisted by thorough physical preparation for Olympic bidding.

18. We see transport infrastructure as crucial both to a successful bid and to negate detrimental impacts for Hackney. While we are not the only inner London borough to not have a tube station, we are the only one on the north bank of the Thames and we are surrounded by boroughs with tube stations. This makes us appear to have poor public transport links and has a detrimental effect on the borough and its regeneration potential. In terms of attracting and growing local business, transport links is one of the key factors that deter business from moving into the borough.

19. The East London Line extension is set to put us on the tube map with connections to South London and Finsbury Park. This will however only affect a small section of the borough and we believe that an underground Crossrail, linking the centre of the borough to both central London and Stratford is necessary to include in Olympic preparations to both benefit local people and improve access to the sports facilities.

20. Therefore while it is true that with International Rail connections to Stratford there are good connections for international visitors, if London as a whole is to benefit economically from hosting the Olympics it is essential that good public transport links are established from Hackney Wick through Hackney Central to the West End. It is this, above all else, which would lead to a lasting regenerative legacy for Hackney.

21. Research carried out locally has shown us that there are a number of people who will not travel far to access work, so our strategy besides training people for jobs elsewhere is to retain and where possible expand the number of jobs available locally. Hackney Wick is our major if not only significant area zoned for industrial activity where we have a realistic opportunity to grow the number of jobs available locally.

Consequently it is important for us to:

  • Have good transport links to new potential jobs, including those in construction;
  • Have early sight of the job types so we can train local people for them;
  • Retain business and industrial uses on the Hackney Wick site (even if temporarily used for other purposes).

22. Hackney and the east end in general is an area of great cultural diversity and can use this diversity to make athletes and visitors from around the globe feel welcome.

23. The local provision of facilities to an international standard, would encourage greater participation in the various sports and create many sports related jobs. It can also be marketed to promote health living and be a valuable resource to encourage young people away from crime and into sport. However some new facilities may need to be developed on greenfield or public sites and could encounter local opposition if issues around community benefits, accessibility, affordability, compensation and who pays for upkeep after the event are not factored in from the beginning.

14 January 2003




 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 23 January 2003