Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 160 - 162)

WEDNESDAY 15 JANUARY 2003

RT HON TESSA JOWELL, MP, RT HON RICHARD CABORN, MP AND MR ROBERT RAINE

Mr Flook

  160. I do not wish to prejudge it either.
  (Tessa Jowell) What I would hope is that if we do decide to bid that our friends in the press, who have been powerful advocates for the case for the bid will remain powerful advocates of the bid and also the Government and the BOA in the event that we win a bid and proceed to put in place the facilities for an Olympics.

  161. What piece of advice on winning from all of the lessons you are likely to learn and all lessons you have learned, apart from the Dome, from Wembley, from Manchester, what piece of advice will you give the person who will be Secretary of State in August 2005?
  (Tessa Jowell) There are two, and this may be a note to myself, for all I know. First of all, be absolutely clear what you are in for and go through the exercise of anticipation and be as confident as you possibly can be of the costs and the other operational issues which are involved before saying yes. If you then say yes you go hell for leather, you give it everything you have to make it the greatest possible success it can be.
  (Mr Caborn) It will not be of any use because in August 2005 the decision will have been made in July.

  Mr Flook: It would take a week to think about how you are going to put it into practice.

Chairman

  162. Could I make the point which follows on what Adrian has said, if the Government were to decide on making a bid then it would appear to me that one of the strongest cases that it could put is that no government has ever gone through such a rigorous assessment of the process of making the bid and if the Government has come to the conclusion that it should make a bid it is because it is determined to win and that it has taken every conceivable factor into account. There you are, I have summed it up for you. Maybe I will be the next secretary of state.
  (Mr Caborn) Thanks to your Committee, quite honestly, because it is after your Committee the PIU Report came and the process we followed is very much what was recommended by your Committee.

  Chairman: Thank you very much indeed. Thank you, Secretary of State and your associates. Thank you very much.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 23 January 2003