Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


APPENDIX 19

Memorandum submitted by the Press Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina

  The PCC have been instrumental in helping to establish press self regulation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). As Special Adviser to the BiH Press Council, I thought the Committee may be interested in my views.

  I have taken the opportunity to enclose a short brief on the BiH Press Council and self-regulation but more importantly for the Committee, I have highlighted the crucial role that the PCC played in the process. You will note from the brief that right from the start, the PCC played a vital supportive role in bringing true press self-regulation to war-torn Bosnia. Without the PCC's advice, counselling and operational assistance, the BiH Press Council would have never seen the light of day and the press would have continued its slow but steady decline. The Press Council now enjoys the support of the press, public, International Community and the Governments and although it has a long way to go before it can be described as a true success, we would never have got this far without the help of the PCC.

PRESS SELF REGULATION IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND THE SUPPORT OF THE UK PRESS COMPLAINTS COMMISSION

  In 1998, three years after the end of the devastating civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the guns had finally fallen silent but ethnic tensions were still running high and, moreover, were being perpetuated by both broadcasting and printed press. The Office of the High Representative, the highest civil authority, sponsored by the International Community, decided to deal with the broadcast media by establishing a regulatory body which would licence and regulate radio and TV. Consequently, in June of that year the Independent Media Commission (IMC) was established. Its mandate was similar to that of other European-style regulators in that it regulated the broadcast media but had no jurisdiction over the press. However, the success of the IMC in bringing order to the chaotic broadcasting landscape (over 80 TV stations and 200 radio stations for a population of cthree million) and reducing hate speech, led to murmurings that some sort of statutory controls might be put into place to regulate the printed press in a similar manner.

  The IMC was keen to push press self-regulation forward as quickly as possible. It was given the task by the High Representative to investigate how systems of press self-regulation worked throughout the rest of Europe and how best to promote the ideas behind independent self-regulation of the press in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was important to bear in mind that although self-regulation is instituted in some dozen or so European countries there is no single model. If there was to be a self-regulatory system in BiH it had to be relative and unique to the country and its press.

  In late 1998 and early 1999 the IMC worked with the six journalists' associations to develop a voluntary Press Code, which was appropriate to the local circumstances. The code was adopted on 29 April 1999 and published in all the major publications. It was at this time that the IMC approached the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) in London to provide expert advice on how to set up a Press Council and how to promote the concept to the press, the governments and the public in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Armed with this vital support work began to establish a European-style Press Council.

  During the discussions the journalists' associations had gone some distance to deciding on what form their Press Council would take. A stumbling block, however, emerged when discussions centred on who would chair the Council. The associations decided eventually that it would be advantageous to have an international chairman who would have knowledge of European self-regulation of the press but who is not caught up in the ethnic divisions with which BiH is driven. Lord Wakeham (Chair of the UK PCC at the time) accepted the invitation to become the first International Chairman of the BiH Press Council. He has since been succeeded by Professor Robert Pinker (acting Chair of UK PCC) with a two-year mandate, which commenced in February 2001.

  The BiH Press Council was constituted as a formal body in September 2000 and on 22 September, Lord Wakeham chaired the first meeting as International Chairman. Initial operational funding was approved by the EC and the Swedish International Development Agency (Sida). A small secretariat was established in early 2001.

  Bosnia and Herzegovina is one of a number of countries that suffers from limitations in the freedom of the press and, indeed, any freedom cannot be taken for granted. Elsewhere in the world, even in countries that had not been subject to a devastating war, controlling powers and/or laws regulating the press are common. Even in long established democracies press freedom can never be taken for granted. The experiences imparted by the PCC were crucial in helping to convince the press in BiH that self regulation is an infinitely better prospect than any statutory controls. To allay the fears of the sceptics, the PCC kindly sent Commissioners to Sarajevo to speak at conferences, seminars and meetings attended by editors, publishers, reporters and members of the International Community. Without this type of support, the whole process could have taken much longer and may have even ground to a halt altogether.

  The press in Bosnia and Herzegovina has been brave to follow the road of self-regulation and much has been achieved in a relatively short timeframe. It is without doubt though, that Bosnia and Herzegovina is now ahead of its neighbouring countries as far as press self regulation is concerned. This would not have been possible without the advice, support and counselling of the PCC.

  Elsewhere in the Balkans and Eastern Europe other countries are looking to BiH to see how self regulation is working. Already the BiH Press Council has had enquiries from Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria, Kosovo and Serbia, asking for information on how to establish similar bodies.

  The PCC's assistance is not only confined to advice, it goes much further. To date the Council has received some 32 complaints which, for a small country in transition, and for a young body at the outset of self-regulation, is a reasonable figure. The complaints are dealt with by the secretariat but before they go to the Council for adjudication or other decisions they are scrutinised by staff at the PCC who offer advice based on their experiences and expertise in dealing with complaints in the UK. This type of administrative support in the process is invaluable because it allows the Council to make informed decisions based on expert advice not currently available in this country from local experts.

  We can say without fear of contradiction that had the PCC not offered its assistance in all aspects of establishing a self regulatory regime for the press in Bosnia, journalistic standards would have continued to erode to such an extent that either the International Community or the Governments would have had no choice but to bring in statutory controls, which would have been a depressing option for a country that is trying very hard to be accepted into the European family.

  Indeed, the position of the UK as a pillar of press freedom is, in itself, of enormous importance as it is looked upon by Bosnians as a model to aspire to. Attacks on press freedom and self-regulation in the UK would no doubt play into the hands of those here who wish to suppress free speech and democracy.

  It is hoped that the PCC will continue to support the BiH Press Council and its operations until early 2004 when a Bosnian will take over the chair and funding will be found through domestic means.

27 January 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 16 June 2003