Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


APPENDIX 24

Memorandum submitted by the Swedish Press Council

  We have been asked by our colleagues and friends in the Press Complaints Commission of the United Kingdom to explain in a few words the importance of self-regulation of the press in Sweden.

  The beginning of this self-regulation dates back to 1916 when the Swedish Press Council was founded by independent press organisations. At that time the entire council consisted of representatives of the press. The system was revised and expanded in 1969 when representatives of the general public were added to the council. The press organisations have no influence whatsoever over the selection and appointment of those representatives.

  The office of the Press Ombudsman (PO) was founded at the same time. The main tasks of the Press Ombudsman are:

  1.  To receive and investigate complaints from individuals who feel personally offended by something that has been published in a newspaper or magazine.

  2.  To be a public spokesman for responsible journalism and good press ethics.

  The Press Ombudsman may independently write off complaints that he finds unfounded. If he, however, is of the opinion that a newspaper deserves formal criticism for what it published he must refer the issue for decision by the Press Council. Around 15% of the complaints received by the Press Ombudsman result in formal criticism by the Press Council. The newspaper in question is obliged to publish the criticism and to pay a fee which contributes to financing the self-regulatory system. The Press Ombudsman and the Press Council do not treat any requests from a complainant for economic recompensation.

  This voluntary system for strengthening editorial responsibility and promoting high ethical standards in journalism is well established in Sweden and enjoys high credibility with the general public. It is also fully accepted by the press.

  The Press Council and the Press Ombudsman take a great interest in the endeavours to establish systems of journalistic self-regulation in other countries. A strong network of independent European press councils has evolved in recent years and contacts are also being maintained with similar bodies outside Europe.

  We cherish these contacts with professional bodies in other countries. Let it be no secret that the Swedish Press Council and the Press Ombudsman of Sweden highly value the professional contacts with our colleagues in the PCC of the UK whose ethical values and mode of operation resemble our own. We focus on assisting individuals who have been maltreated by unfair publications and who feel powerless when faced by powerful media. Like our British colleagues we see ourselves as guardians of the right to privacy.

  Keeping the strong British tradition of press freedom in mind we are of the opinion that the PCC plays an important role in trying to establish editorial responsibility and high journalistic ethical standards in countries where the freedom of the press finds itself in a less developed state. Since freedom of the press enjoys a long history also in our country we look forward, in the coming years, to fortifying the partnership that we have had the privilege to develop with our friends in the PCC.

21 January 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 16 June 2003