Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Pathé Distribution

  1.  Pathé is the oldest film company in the world and is possibly the only pan-European media company with the production and distribution of films at the heart of its business. Pathé is also the owner of the largest chain of cinemas in continental Europe.

  2.  Pathé's principal offices are in London and Paris from which it produces around 15 films each year and distributes around 50.

  3.  Pathé UK has been distributing films for almost 15 years, but it was only with the award of a Lottery Franchise in 1997 that Pathé was able to create a fully integrated production and distribution mini-Studio with a staff of approximately 50. The UK distribution activities were further enhanced in 2000 with the establishment of Pathé International, a sales agent responsible for selling Pathé's films to distributors throughout the world.

  4.  Although the Lottery Franchises have been the subject of criticism, the commercial reality is that if Pathé had not received a Lottery Franchise, it would not have created a substantial mini-Studio in the UK, nor would Pathé have invested to date £31 million of its own money (compared to £28 million of Lottery funds) in the development and production of 19 British Films which Pathé went on to support at the Box Office with advertising spend of a further £15 million (inclusive of the forecast spend on eight of the films which are still in production).

  5.  Pathe UK has finally arrived at a stage where the quality and commercial potential of the projects on its slate are truly exciting to the international market place (including the latest films from Gurinder Chadha and Danny Boyle and the CGI animated feature film version of The Magic Roundabout). We hope to be at the beginning of a virtuous cycle where success attracts success. That is the true measure of the value of the seed-money provided by the Lottery Franchise.

  6.  Given Pathe's unique position as a bi-polar Anglo-French company, it might be interesting for the Committee to consider certain aspects of the French model for support of its film industry, a model which is greatly admired by film-makers:

    (i)  The policy of the State has been consistent for the last 50 years.

    (ii)   Save for grants and soft loans made available to new film-makers and to films of cultural significance which are the subject of discretionary awards through committees and civil servants, all other State support is automatic: a tax is levied on cinema tickets and the resultant fund is allocated between the French films in a given year pro rata to their respective box office grosses in France. The allocation to a given film is shared between the producer, the distributor and the exhibitor.

    (iii)  The State obliges the broadcasters to invest a portion of their turnover in pre-buying/investing in the production of French films.

    (iv)   The State underwrites 70% of the value of production loans made by specialised lending institutions (Coficine and Cofiloisirs).

    (v)   Individuals are able to write off taxes by investing in production investment vehicles (Soficas) which provide equity finance to a slate of productions. However, it is rumoured that the French authorities are intrigued by the perceived success of the UK sale and leaseback structure and are looking at ways to adapt the Sofica system to this model.

  7.  With respect to the Government's future policies to support the film industry in the UK, we would respectfully recommend that:

FISCAL INCENTIVES

    (i)   Fiscal incentives for production be maintained until at least 2010;

    (ii)   such fiscal incentives for production be conditional upon the producer demonstrating the contractual engagement of a bona fide UK distributor to distribute the film in the UK;

    (iii)  such fiscal incentives for production be part of a consistent, long term fiscal strategy to support the industry (given that each time the fiscal rules change, the lawyers, accountants and the middlemen get rich at the producer's expense; and the unscrupulous have a window to discover new loopholes to abuse before they are rooted out).

BROADCASTERS

    (iv)  The broadcasters (including Sky) be encouraged by the Government to demonstrate their commitment to the cultural and commercial significance of the film industry. One way would be for them to agree, without dropping their already modest pre-buy prices, to take fewer broadcast rights for a shorter license period (thereby enabling the producer to retain the catalogue value of the film as a revenue generating asset).

June 2003





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 September 2003