Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


SUBMISSION 7

Memorandum submitted by the Film Societies North West (part of The British Federation of Film Societies)

THE INQUIRY INTO ALL ASPECTS OF THE BRITISH FILM INDUSTRY

  I am writing not from the point of view of people employed by the film industry, nor of people involved in jobs connected with the film industry that are ultimately funded by public money. I am writing in respect of people who give up their spare time to get involved in amateur film exhibition and to which film is a hobby, an interest, a passion, and a concern.

  I wish to comment with regard to "awareness of and access to moving image", and in particular to address the two questions:

    —  How can the distribution and exhibition of British films be improved in the UK? Is the right balance being struck between these elements of the film industry?

    —  What has the Film Council contributed to education about, and access to, the moving image? What should the Council do with the bfi and the Museum of Moving Image?

WHAT IS A SUCCESS?

  The glory days of British Cinema Screen Exhibition has long gone, like the golden ages of canals and railways. DVD and video releases produce four times as much income to the Hollywood studios as do box office receipts, and the Computer Games Industry generates more money than Hollywood, which is why Hollywood encourages tie-ins with films. Our film industry must not take its eyes off this ball if it does not wish to drop further behind.

  Hollywood films and Hollywood values dominate the multiplex chains. I go to my local multiplex at least once a week and I see a lot of USA films that I like. There is competition over the "opening weekend" box office figures and this is a battle the Film Council must not be sucked into. The reputation of many fine UK films is destroyed because it did not set the box office alight, and while the successes like Billy Elliott are to be applauded and savoured, it must be remembered that this is only a second stage in the exhibition lifestyle of a film.

  I observe six stages in the life of a film and the Film Council and film producers should pay attention to all these stages if it is to be rewarded.

  1.  The first stage is the pre-release stage, when some films are taken on the Film Festival circuit to hopefully gain themselves awards but mainly a good distribution deal.

  2.  The second stage is the theatrical release, either through a multiplex deal, or the more limited number of screens available through the alternative circuit of Independents and Regional Film Theatres.

  3.  The third stage is the DVD release, which follows around six months later from the cinema release. The trade papers suggest that a Hollywood studio can earn three to four times as much money from the DVD release as from the box office receipts, yet the British industry releases their DVDs almost as an apology. At least some directors I have talked to, such as Asif Kapadia and Danny Boyle, have put considerable thought into what makes the DVD release different and special.

  I spend a fair amount of time browsing in HMV and Virgin stores, particularly in the DVD sections, and the British idea seems to be to release a DVD with the minimum of fuss and budget, and let it sink or swim. There are exceptions where a DVD distributor makes an effort with names such as Bend it Like Beckham. Perhaps the Film Industry should study more how the British Music Industry has kept its place in our hearts, in our entertainment culture, and in our music stores..

  4.  The fourth stage is where the film appears on one of the digital /satellite film channels, or DVD and video rental shops.

  5.  The fifth stage is where a film goes around the film society/film club circuit. This can be between six months and three years of the original cinema release. This again is a stage that the industry ignores, but into which local film groups put in a lot of time and effort to locally promote the films they screen.

  6.  The sixth stage is the screening on terrestrial channels. How many industry names can be seen on chat shows trying to promote a wide viewing audience? Probably none. The industry has lost interest after the second stage anyway, even though all the subsequent stages can still rejuvenate DVD sales.

  The public is involved as an audience in all six stages, and the public interest can help determine receipts in all six stages. Therefore if public money is advanced to help in the production of a film, the responsibility of the film-makers for helping in the promotion of the film should not end, or seem to end, with the cinema premiere, which is only the start of the financial returns.

A THIRD EXHIBITION CIRCUIT

  The sixth national Cinemas in the Community conference in April will promote the worth of cinemas to a community. I do not dispute this, but wish to draw attention and press the case for a third Exhibition circuit, one based on "Home Cinema Technology" and DVD discs and equipment, that is almost as simple to use as presenting a slide show, and which can reach far more communities and smaller groups in the twenty-first century than cinemas can.

  It is:

    —  one that can improve the opportunities for more British films to reach a nationwide UK audience;

    —  one that does not compete with the existing 35mm cinema circuits;

    —  one that does not take up a great deal of funding, because all the raw ingredients are already out there, the venues, the equipment, the community groups, the local authority arts officers, and the film fans;

    —  one that does not take a great deal of manpower to oversee, because the volunteer activists are out there;

    —  one that is democratically-based because its choice of films is based upon the choices made by its own members; and

    —  one that is capable of astronomical growth and of generating a change of climate as to how UK film culture fits into our world of arts and entertainment. It is the positive encouragement of film societies and film clubs all over the country.

  What is needed centrally are initiatives to get these local people into dialogue and information exchange, "to maximise the utilisation of existing resources" as they say, and to make it easy for such groups to know what British films are available for hire, what their plot lines are (to jog the memory) and to send over the Internet marketing material for local promotion, and to make the booking process as easy and attractive as possible.

  According to the statistics I heard at a previous "Cinemas in the Community" conference, an average of 26,000 surrounding catchment population is needed for the establishment of each cinema screen in a town or city to be remotely viable. By contrast there is almost no lower limit needed to the establishment of a film club or film society in a community. When one reads the local papers and observes the number of amateur and school football teams and the economic input they put into the community and the country, so it could be for film societies and film clubs. It is almost as easy to set up a small cinema style screening for a smallish audience as it is to set up a slide show. Technology is making the equipment easy to use, user-friendly, and to produce impressive results that comes from the digital source.

  The circuit must be based on DVD digital projection, and because of the time lag between the availability of 35mm prints and the DVDs, the cinema circuits do not compete with the same films.

  To get such a community group off the ground in terms of prices is almost of "Home Cinema" proportions. Most schools in the country have access to a digital projector, a video player and/or a DVD player. They are also beginning to be acquired by local authorities, amateur film-making groups, and other community groups. The equipment is coming down in both price and ease of usage and familiarity of usage (how many people have handed a CD or DVD disc as opposed to a 16mm reel of film?). Such equipment can now be bought for between £1,000 and £3,000, and such facilities should be utilised to the maximum by the community rather than be allowed to gather dust.

  The venues are already out there, be they village halls, school rooms, conference rooms in public buildings, community centres, and function rooms in pubs and clubs.

  Most local authorities have arts officers or arts teams, who are ideally placed to assist in the formation of such clubs in their area, and to get interested parties together around a table to explore how such facilities and such a club can best benefit their community.

  Local authority bodies such as the libraries and Councils for Voluntary Services are aware of the school, youth club, age concern, and minority ethnic, cultural or disadvantaged groups in their area.

  Local authority libraries are all taking the first steps to setting up DVD borrowing sections, yet this is another market/audience reach that is being ignored or overlooked by the Film Council.

THE ECONOMIC CASE

  The economics of a film society screening will be similar to that for any school or community group. A film society is a private cinema club, that is a screening at which the public cannot be admitted, but members or guests can attend, so it is like a Labour Club or Conservative Club. There are two distributors of DVDs for Exhibition purposes, Filmbank and the British Film Institute, with Filmbank concentrating on the mainstream and the bfi more on World Cinema.

  Each Society pays around £60 to £100 for the hire of a DVD, and this includes all the appropriate nights including music performance. To include publicity and venue hire etc, £150 would cover the costs of a screening, and this is normally met by member subscriptions. Such small overheads make screenings a possibility in small rural communities far away from a cinema, in places such as old folks homes where transportation to a venue presents problems, and in small ethnic or culturally different communities where cinema screenings cannot be justified. Going into a community generates long-term goodwill.

  If an organisation like the BBC can market its own products, then the Film Council should have a commercial arm to help exploit its own products to their potential, where other distributors have decided to pass on opportunities. Such an arm of the Film Council should be capable of the arranging of bureaucratically easy hire of DVDs to which they have had some financial input. If they can offer attractive discounted rates to such clubs, this can promote additional screenings of more British Films.

  If one person in fifty can be tempted to join a local film group, and the average membership of such a group is 20, that is 50,000 film society/club groups throughout the nation. If the Film Council could obtain just £30 for the film hire of a UK film from each group, that is a potential £1,500,000 per film. If such societies could be persuaded by the low overheads to fit in an extra British film per month, that is a potential return of £18,000,000 on hire fees alone, and some of the audience may have been persuaded to buy their own copy of the DVD. That is the potential to be explored.

THE LAW

  A venue can only accommodate six or fewer screenings to which the general public can be admitted in a twelve month period to avoid the need for a cinema licence. Any more and a cinema licence is mandatory. Film societies do screen more, but they are private clubs. A DVD distributor would require 50% of the Box Office or the standard hire fee, whichever is the greater.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

  I am an active member of the Sons of the Desert, the Laurel and Hardy Appreciation Society. There are about 30 branches up and down the country screening the Boys films monthly in diverse small venues, usually pubs. In this capacity I have accepted invitations to put on screenings of the Boys films to such groups as Downs Syndrome Sufferers and Parkinsons Disease Sufferers, and to Heritage Groups needing extra entertainment at an event.

  Being part of a Local Heritage Network myself, I have also been able to add a few video treats for the benefit of an audience curious about their locality. I have been saddened to find that such community activity is rare, and it is a vast under-utilised further educational resource considering the material in such archives as the Imperial War Museum.

  It is not really the economics that are the problem, but establishing a dialogue/information exchange between the archivists, the film distributors, the local authority arts officers, and local activists. Such material can provide many a valuable "supporting programme" to a feature film.

THE FILM CLIMATE

  We should all be working together to establish a better climate for film, film culture and film heritage, in the UK, and like all climate change there is no single long-term factor, but several strands have to be pursued long-term.

  The Film Curriculum in schools and colleges appears to work in isolation from the rest of the community, and when a student leaves college he has to fend for himself. Yet film can be a pleasurable lifelong experience for all ages, one that can benefit the UK film industry if the spotlight is moved away from Hollywood all the time. The DVD format, in the form of "extras", gives the opportunity to educate and inform, yet how many people with film educational expertise are permitted input? Those DVDs into which the Film Council has some input must contain extras that are there to educate, inform and help promote the UK film industry.

THE AUTHOR'S BACKGROUND

  I started a St. Helens Film Society in 1994. When the Centenary of Cinema took place in 1996 we helped to promote George Groves (who helped Warner Brothers to earn 32 Academy Award nominations for Sound), Herbert Mundin (who featured in films with Clark Gable and Errol Flynn) and Lion (built in 1838 and over 100 years later became the Titfield Thunderbolt). I later joined the Film Societies North West Committee and in 1997 became its secretary. There are only five active regional groups in the UK, Scotland, Wales, Yorkshire, the South West and the North West, so there is potential for more growth.

  We joined the North West Film Exhibitors Consortium because we believe in the strengths of talking to each other, and I am now that organisation's Treasurer. I became a member of BAFTA North which is particularly active in this area.

  I became a member of the Network of UK Film, Television and Multi Media Festival Organisers, to help me learn and to help me with my voluntary duties. I joined because I still have this ambition for a Great British Feature Film Festival here in the North West and I want to learn how best to make it a successful event.

  I am an active member of the Sons of the Desert (the Laurel and Hardy Appreciation Society) and a passive member of the Institute of Amateur Cinematographers (because I am interested in making short films about aspects of local history) and a passive member of the Cinema Theatre Association.

  I enjoy the cinema experience and I pay for it myself. I go to my local multiplex at least once a week, and I also visit cinemas in Liverpool and Manchester, but less frequently. I also watch two or three films a week taped from terrestrial television, quite often black and white or mainstream.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 September 2003