Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


SUBMISSION 22

Memorandum submitted by the Film Export Group

THE BRITISH FILM INDUSTRY INQUIRY—BRITISH FILM EXPORTS

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  An important factor in any assessment of the British Film Industry is the opportunity for exports and the economic and cultural benefits that result. Work is currently underway within the sector to provide co-ordination and information to the Industry and Government on film-related export activity.

  1.2  This work is being carried out by the Film Exports Group (FEG)—a sub-group of the Creative Export Group, which was set up by Government to provide advice on content issues relating to the creative industries. Membership of the Film Export Group includes: British Council, Visiting Arts, PACT, Trade Partners UK, Film Council, British Film Institute, Invest UK, AFMA Europe, film sales companies and industry experts. The DCMS and Trade Partners UK hold joint secretariat roles for the Group.

  1.3  The work of FEG has only recently started and final conclusions, on how best to stimulate and support film exports, will not be reached until later in 2003. There are, however, some preliminary recommendations, which are summarised below.

2.  SUMMARY PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS

2.1  Integrated strategy

  Delivery of policy must be led by an overall strategy incorporating the work of all bodies conducting activities in this field. This is not happening at present. This goal could be realised by structural change or by the acceptance by all bodies of a joint strategy. The latter appears to be the preferred approach.

2.2  Coherent branding

  If an integrated strategy does not come about through structural change, there is still an urgent need for a simplification of the numerous public policy film brands with which the international market is confronted. An assessment of the possible benefits of a coherent brand should be undertaken quickly. The preferred solution should provide easy access to a single source of information on all aspects of the UK industry required by the international markets. Coherent branding might extend to a simple, well designed, "umbrella" web site that could provide links to sites of the underlying organisations.

2.3  Fitting the realities of the industry

  Once the overall strategy is determined, a set of initiatives need to be delivered that are structured in recognition of the specific realities of the film industry. Generic support mechanisms appropriate for initiatives in manufacturing industries, for example, will not in most cases work for film.

2.4  Festival launches

  Support could be made available for the launch of qualifying British films at major festivals. This support might be provided for a carefully defined set of activities that serve to increase the impact of specific films. A successful launch should result in greater distribution prospects in the festival host country, greater sales of the film in other territories and improved prospects for the future careers of the film-makers and cast. This kind of support is likely to be additional to activity that would otherwise have taken place. It is also potentially expensive. As a consequence, clear criteria would need to be established in order to prioritise the range of likely demands from large and small sales agents but would, with careful management, provide a valuable marketing resource.

2.5  Promotion of British talent

  Promotion of British feature film talent should be a key goal of export promotion activity. A carefully structured set of initiatives should be constructed. It is recommended that they could include:

    —  a "UK Film Week" in each of Los Angeles and New York, outside the context of any other market or festival;

    —  funding available for film-makers and cast to attend a carefully managed set of festivals where they will obtain international press exposure or otherwise further their careers;

    —  a regular showcase of UK talent, possibly at the Cannes Film Festival;

    —  links with UK broadcasters, particularly BBC and Channel 4, who in many ways "carry the flag" for UK talent internationally due to the comparatively easy (compared to other countries) talent transfer between television and film; and

    —  retaining a major publicist charged with promoting talent especially in the US market on an ongoing basis.

2.6  Information provision to UK industry

  The UK industry could benefit from much better information availability on international markets. Suggested priorities are:

    —  historical international box office data, searchable by film-makers and key cast;

    —  a database indicating the press and attention received by British talent internationally; and

    —  market summaries, regularly updated, giving key market information on sales territories—structure of market, key players, trends, especially health and make-up of ancillary markets such as DVD/video and television.

  The Film Council's Research and Statistics Unit will work with the FEG to prioritise and meet these information needs.

2.7  British Film Office, LA

  The British Film Office (BFO) will deliver a strategy and coordination for North American export promotion activities. These could include:

    —  supervising North American event initiatives—principally the "UK Film Weeks" discussed above, and Sundance and Toronto Festivals and providing strategic advice on the exploitation of other festivals and markets;

    —  providing market intelligence for UK producers and sales agents to plan their strategies and trips to Los Angeles;

    —  providing a base of operations for producers and sales agents when in LA; and

    —  providing increased services to North American buyers—especially information on UK talent and coordination of exposure to talent and press.

  The BFO will work with FEG to prioritise and meet these needs.

2.8  Support for national distributors

  Wherever possible, national distributors should be provided with the tools they need to do the best job of marketing British films in their territories. However, the cost of dubbing, sub-titling, film prints, marketing materials and press exposure are all expensive. A pilot scheme could be implemented in selected territories to evaluate whether support can be provided economically to these distributors in return for a material improvement in company performance.

2.9  Other support for producers or their sales agents

  Apart from measures listed above, producers or their sales agents often need assistance during pre-pre-production in funding trips to key distributors whose pre-sales may complete the financing of their films. While this activity is an integral export function this could be accommodated through augmented project development funding rather than as separate support specifically directed towards exports.

2.10  Priority territories

  There are four sets of priority territories all with different export development needs. North America is potentially the most valuable territory, though a source of equity finance and pre-sales for only bigger British projects. Within North America there is already one annual core event (the American Film Market in February) and a number of secondary events that can potentially deliver to the UK. Secondly, Europe is a key market and the most important source of finance for British films outside the UK. Export promotion in Europe traditionally rests with four core annual events (Berlin in February, Cannes in May, Venice in late August and MIFED in November). There are also opportunities in a number of secondary events and festivals for the promotion of UK product, skills and talent. Third, distant valuable territories—Japan, Korea and Australia—should be candidates for managed visits by groups of sales agents and others in order to better understand the specifics of each territory and market and strengthen the potential for future trade. Finally, there the emerging markets such as the Accession States, India, China and South Africa which need long term nurturing (longer than UK sales agents can reasonably afford); and which for political and cultural reasons now and commercial potential in the future we should be investing in. In the first instance, these are probably served best by initial field research to assess actual potential.

3.  SUMMARY

  3.1  The FEG holds that an effective and coordinated strategy for film exports (product, talent, skills and infrastructure) is a precondition for the development of a sustainable film industry. Through the DCMS, the Government has already acknowledged this by establishing the Film Exports Group. The FEG looks forward to continued working and long term planning with Government in order to ensure the UK has a successful and sustainable film industry in the global marketplace.

4.  DISCLAIMER

  4.1  The views expressed in this submission are those of the individual members of the FEG. They do not necessarily reflect the current policy of the Government departments involved.

5 March 2003



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 September 2003