Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


SUBMISSION 48

Supplementary memorandum submitted by the film office

DIVERSITY IN THE FILM INDUSTRY

  I was very interested in the questions that you asked last Tuesday regarding diversity in the film industry and the answers you received. It came as no surprise to hear you being told that nepotism is still rife. In some respects the industry is still quite feudal: productions are often little principalities with a rigid pecking order. Since most personnel are freelance and dependent on the patronage of the hierarchy for their next job this often fosters an unhealthy environment where diversity of opinion is stifled and sycophancy rewarded. Talent and ability are recognised but jobs are equally often awarded on the basis of who one knows or whether one's face fits: "are they `one of us?'" Ethnic minorities, who usually are not "members of the club," are highly disadvantaged in this (though their success in nevertheless gaining ground in the Industry is a testimony to their talent and ability).

  It is vitally important therefore that the institutions that have been established set a good example in this matter but this has not always been the case. The London Film Commission's record for employing people from ethnic minorities is poor: indeed it may be that they have never employed someone from an ethnic background since it was established in 1995. (You may wish to satisfy yourself on this score by examining their employment records since I cannot be absolutely positive about this but certainly they have never had anyone from an ethnic background working in a prominent role though there are plenty of able people.)

  This is not the standard one expects from a publicly funded body. I do not believe it is racism of the BNP kind—though you can imagine what would be said if the same statistic were true of the Police!—more that it reveals a mind-set that leans towards cronyism. This has been damaging for the LFC, never good at handling criticism however positive, as it has stifled real debate about its role and direction. There has been little room for diversity of opinion: those who do express views contrary to those of the LFC are cold-shouldered or worse.

25 June 2003



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 September 2003