Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60-79)

THURSDAY 27 FEBRUARY 2003

DR BRYAN WELLS, COLONEL PHILIP ROUSE AND MS KATE SMITH

  60. How are the personnel trained to do these kinds of inspections?
  (Colonel Rouse) The personnel who escort inbound inspections into this country and undertake the outbound inspections to other states' parties are part of the Joint Arms Control Implementation Group, JACIG, at Henlow. It is a tri-service organisation, 77 strong, I think. They are organised into four inspecting flights or teams, each of nine strong, each flight or team headed up by a Lieutenant Colonel or Wing Commander equivalent. They have a linguistic section as well so they have Russian speakers there. JACIG is tasked and organised to undertake both the inbound inspections and the outbound inspections. Training takes place at JACIG. They train themselves both on the detail of the treaties and also on the protocols and the conduct of inspections. It has been running for 10 years and it works extremely well. They are a very professional organisation.

  61. What happens if they find something outside their treaty responsibilities? If you are looking for something hidden and suddenly you come across something and you think this may not be within the CFE treaty but it must come under some other treaty that we are a signatory to, has that ever cropped up?
  (Dr Wells) To my knowledge, that has not cropped up. If such items were found it could be reported to the appropriate international body that monitored compliance with the relevant treaty.

  62. Would they be empowered to do that?
  (Dr Wells) I believe so.

Rachel Squire

  63. Picking up on the section VIII challenge inspections, you have already mentioned some of the restrictions and the maximum size of the area has to be 65 square kilometres. What is the notice period? You say it has to be 36 hours' notice for section VII; is it the same notice period for section VIII?
  (Dr Wells) Yes, it is.

  64. What constraints are there on other states in trying to define the specified areas in the UK that they wish to inspect? You have said it must be a maximum of 65 square kilometres and take no more than 24 hours. What other constraints are there on another state coming in to do a section VIII challenge inspection, about where they can go and the sites they can choose?
  (Dr Wells) There have been no recent section VIII inspections on the UK. There have been section VIII inspections in Germany, I believe. Those criteria that I have laid out are essentially the criteria that a visiting state must undertake and fulfil together with various stipulations on the points of entry and so on.

  65. Do the challenge inspections come about because another state tries to imply that there is some non-compliance and therefore asks to visit a particular site to check that out?
  (Dr Wells) Yes. The issue would be whether there was treaty limited equipment outside of the declared sites. A specified area that would be subject to a challenge inspection could be anywhere on the territory, but the declared sites would be excluded from a section VIII inspection. The objective there is to see whether there is any treaty limited equipment that is not being held in a declared site.

  66. On that basis, could they say, for instance, that they want to visit Westminster or an inner city area, as opposed to somewhere like Salisbury Plain, where there is military activity constantly?
  (Dr Wells) In theory they could do but equally in terms of the access they can have they can only enter buildings which have doors wider than two metres. That clearly limits some of the places that could be inspected in inner cities.

  Rachel Squire: What is the significance of wider than two metres? Is that the smallest size?

  Chairman: I am sure that is going to appear in the next edition of The Officer!

Rachel Squire

  67. Is that the smallest size of an armed vehicle?
  (Dr Wells) The thinking behind it is to do with dimensions of treaty limited equipment, yes.

  68. In respect to the section VIII regime, have you had to exercise your powers? You say there has not been a section VIII challenge inspection in the UK for some time but in the past when you have had to exercise your powers to insist that private owners make their land and property available for inspection—for instance, a private owner could be a company running a dockyard or a workshop or private individuals with a large expanse of land—have you ever had to deal with private owners and how have you managed that?
  (Dr Wells) Under section VIII inspections, the original Arms Control Bill, the Act of 1991, did provide for access to private properties in the UK. Inspection teams in the past have confined themselves to military installations in the specified areas but for all section VIII inspections a police officer does accompany the escort team with a warrant drawn up under the 1991 Act should entry to private property be required.

Chairman

  69. Could that be an MoD policeman or does it have to be a county constabulary one?
  (Colonel Rouse) I think it is normally a county constabulary one. It would not be an MoD policeman, I do not believe.

  70. What if the guy says, "I do not want you to look around my farm"? Maybe a farmer would have something he does not want the police to look at which may not be an item within the CFE treaty. I can imagine all sorts of things.
  (Dr Wells) The police officer is there with a warrant. The inspecting team would do the inspection.

Mr Cran

  71. I wondered if you could set out in rather more detail the rights of private owners under the current regime. You say the police come along with a warrant. Can an individual refuse?
  (Dr Wells) Under the current Act which has been passed by Parliament, if an inspection team under a section VIII inspection does wish to exercise the treaty rights of inspecting private property, subject to the size of the door, the policeman has a warrant and the inspectors are entitled to enter.

  72. The private individual has absolutely no rights at all under these provisions?
  (Dr Wells) I would not have gone so far as to say they have no rights but—

  73. If they have rights, please enumerate the ones that they do have.
  (Colonel Rouse) The circumstances under which an inspecting team might wish to enter a private owner's property are very, very rare. These inspections are conducted in the spirit of the treaty and the inspections do take place on military installations rather than private land. Yes, in theory, an inspecting team could under a Section VIII inspection go into private land. In practice, these things tend to be handled very sensitively on the ground and if there is clearly a situation developing in which a private owner has difficulty with what he or she is being asked to do, then the JCIG inspector would take the appropriate action and if the JCIG inspecting team leader felt that right of access needed to be refused, then he or she could do so. There is a certain pragmatism.

  74. I do not understand, he or she could do what?
  (Colonel Rouse) Should a situation develop on the ground where a private owner objects then the escort team leader from JCIG could deny access to the inspecting team and by doing that could possibly incur an observation by the inspecting team but it would be within the JCIG escort team leader's right to do that if he felt that an unwelcome situation needed to be avoided.

  75. Where is all this set out, that is to say that the inspecting officer can indeed weigh in on behalf of the objecting private owner? Where is that all set out, in the Bill?
  (Colonel Rouse) It is not set out in the Bill, no.

  76. Where is it set out?
  (Colonel Rouse) I do not know the answer to that but I do understand that to be normal practice.

  77. But should you not know that? I take entirely the point you are making which is most, if not all, of the inspections take place in military establishments and military land and so on but things are not static. In future it may well be the case that you could not say no and it may well be the case that inspections will take place on private land and therefore it seems right that the individual should know what his or her rights happen to be and where they are set out and codified. Are you really telling me you do not know where they are set out?
  (Colonel Rouse) The training that the JCIG—

  78. No, I want to be clear from you that you do not know.
  (Colonel Rouse) I am saying I am unclear about where it is laid out.

Chairman

  79. Could you drop us a note?
  (Colonel Rouse) Certainly.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 14 April 2003