Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 80-83)

DAME PAULINE NEVILLE-JONES, SIR JOHN CHISHOLM AND MR GLENN YOUNGKIN

TUESDAY 21 JANUARY 2003

  80. I meant that the other way round, what IP do you have which you claim is yours where former DERA Royal Aircraft establishment partners feel it is not yours to exploit but remains theirs, and Rolls Royce is one?
  (Sir John Chisholm) As you know, Mr Howarth, whenever this is raised I always say, please come and talk to us about it, put it on record, let us know, let us investigate it. To date only one company has ever approached us with ten items that have been investigated and dealt with. There is another very large company, which you have just mentioned, who I believe have approached the Ministry of Defence and they have yet to approach us.
  (Dame Pauline Neville-Jones) It is the MoD who take the decision.

  81. The Ministry of Defence makes the decision. You have given me these assurances in the past, Sir John, but these suggestions do still persist and we have received a submission from the SBAC which suggests this is a still a live issue. If there is no resolution in advance of this deal being done and you move into the private sector and subsequently it is found that the intellectual property you claim is yours is not and it belongs to another company who is going to make that decision and who is going to compensate the company? You. There is going to be a tug-of-war between you and the MoD.
  (Sir John Chisholm) What we are talking about here is essentially data. We have an exact audit trail through the RASP process so all of it signed off by the Ministry of Defence as us having it for the purposes of their, that is the Ministry of Defence's own purposes. Under no circumstances shall we hold anybody else's intellectual property for our own use, for use outside of the Ministry of Defence. We have this exact audit trail. Companies are absolutely at liberty, indeed I encourage them, if they believe that the Ministry of Defence have properly given us permission to use that data for Ministry of Defence purposes, they are absolutely at liberty to challenge that on a case-by-case point and there is a process for dealing with that. That has only happened in relation to one company as far as QinetiQ activity is concerned. I believe another company have approached the Ministry of Defence.

Chairman

  82. We have a couple more questions, perhaps we can write to you because Dr Moonie is banging on the door outside and we do not want to keep him any longer. Thank you very much. I regret to say I hope all goes well with the company.
  (Dame Pauline Neville-Jones) Thank you very much.

  83. Stay British. I hope that the decision made by the Government turns out to be the right one. We shall be watching.
  (Dame Pauline Neville-Jones) Thank you for your good wishes.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 9 April 2003