Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 360-379)

AIR MARSHAL BRIAN BURRIDGE CBE

11 JUNE 2003

Q360  Mr Jones: What about the issue of hand grenades and the Swiss Government?

Air Marshal Burridge: I am not aware of that.

Q361  Mr Jones: At all?

Air Marshal Burridge: No.

Q362  Mr Jones: Could you drop us a note?

Air Marshal Burridge: Nobody in the command chain below me said they were inadequately supplied with hand grenades. There could be a logistic stocking issue, but as far as combat was concerned in theatre that was not an issue which was raised.

Q363  Mr Jones: For the purposes of our inquiry, could you drop us a note to answer some of these points for us?

Air Marshal Burridge: Yes; sure.

Q364  Jim Knight: He said that we did not have sufficient hand grenades and our hand grenades were ordered on a just-in-time basis from a Swiss company. The Swiss Government decided it would not allow the export of hand grenades to soldiers who were going to fight a war. Presumably you can only have them in Switzerland if you are not going to fight a war.

Air Marshal Burridge: Okay, we will provide you with a note.

Q365  Chairman: On the problems as well of ordering desert clothing from Romania, Indonesia and body armour from South Africa and Belgium. This was the evidence we had last week and if you cannot supply a note, obviously we will get back later to somebody who was closer to this.

Air Marshal Burridge: They are very legitimate questions, but really for someone in the logistic trail.

Q366  Chairman: Despite your position we cannot land every problem on your shoulders.

Air Marshal Burridge: Thank you, Chairman.

Q367  Mr Hancock: Were you satisfied that when troops were in harm's way they were given the maximum possible protection that was available to front line soldiers in the British Army?

Air Marshal Burridge: Yes, because no commander told me otherwise and they would have.

Q368  Mr Hancock: You are absolutely sure about that.

Air Marshal Burridge: No commander told me otherwise.

Q369  Mr Hancock: So no front line British soldiers were not properly equipped with flak jackets and the correct ceramics during this campaign.

Air Marshal Burridge: No, I cannot say that.

Q370  Mr Hancock: None of your subordinates brought to your attention the fact that they did not have that. Your superior had given a direct order that no British forces should be engaging the enemy without that protection.

Air Marshal Burridge: No commander in the field raised that issue up the command chain and they would have done.

Q371  Mr Hancock: And since the war it has not been raised with you as a problem.

Air Marshal Burridge: No.

Q372  Mr Howarth: Were any items provided by the United States or did the United States depend on us for any logistic support? We know that they provided rations and lavatory paper at one point, but I think we take the view of General Jackson on that one. Are there more significant items which they provided?

Air Marshal Burridge: Blue force tracking, the kits that fit to vehicles as part of combat identification. I cannot say that we did not share weapons or ammunition at some point, I simply do not know. Blue force tracking would be the one item I would highlight. Some of our CIS, because they provided us with some XNET terminals and we provided some of our own. What did we provide for them in terms of equipment? We assisted them logistically in moving fuel and things. I do not know whose fuel it was we were moving.

Q373  Mr Howarth: But we did the moving?

Air Marshal Burridge: Yes.

Q374  Mr Howarth: Because we are quite good at that.

Air Marshal Burridge: Yes.

Q375  Mr Howarth: On the blue force tracking which is the kit which enables the identification of friend or foe, you know that has been a big issue here. Are you confident that the kit which was then made available at the last minute is now going to be provided across our armed forced?

Air Marshal Burridge: I do not know that; I simply do not know. I do not control the equipment programme.

Q376  Mr Howarth: You were the commander when we took blue on blue and you must feel, on behalf of your men, a sense of disappointment, if not anger, that we sustained such a high proportion of our casualties to blue on blue. Are you not therefore making a very strong recommendation to those responsible for the dishing out of the kit that this kit be provided PDQ?

Air Marshal Burridge: What I feel and what I know are different things. I do not know what priority currently, on day three back at work, this is being given. What I feel is that it is very important, but technology is not all of it. What I would like people to understand, not only this Committee but also those engaged in providing solutions, is that there is a balance here. Technology provides a greater and greater chance of avoiding these tragic sorts of accidents, but technology alone will not work. There has to be training, there have to be procedures, etc. That same technology is allowing us to drive our tempo up. This is the first operation that I characterise as post-modern warfare. The degree and speed of manoeuvre and the tempo that was achieved was startling and it is technology which allows us to do that. If the tempo goes up, the risk of blue on blue goes up. So technology is driving both sides of these scales. It is important that people understand that and do not think we will arrive at a technological solution and that will be that. It will not be. Yes, I feel strongly about these aspects.

Q377  Chairman: Were there any occasions where the late arrival of equipment compelled you to delay or cancel operations?

Air Marshal Burridge: No, but it was close.

Q378  Chairman: Could you tell us which?

Air Marshal Burridge: Challenger 2. A magnificent effort by Alvis-Vickers in modifying Challenger 2s, really very good indeed. The juxtaposition of the UN discussion and what that meant for time lines fortuitously met the technical and engineering time line for Challenger 2. By the time we were ready to go, we had four battle groups all modified.

Q379  Chairman: That was immensely helpful to the Americans in the circumstances, because our percentage of heavy armour was much more significant.

Air Marshal Burridge: Indeed.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 4 November 2003