Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 540-559)

MAJOR GENERAL ROBIN BRIMS CBE AND BRIGADIER SHAUN COWLAM MBE

25 JUNE 2003

Q540  Mr Howarth: Did you, at that stage, envisage the kind of level of commitments that we were going to be making?  

Major General Brims: At that stage, I did not have any orders.

Q541  Mr Howarth: What were you working on, in your discussions with the Americans?  

Major General Brims: Planning.

Q542  Mr Howarth: The planning obviously was based upon a certain British contribution. At that stage, did they ask you and say, "What, General, do you think the UK can bring to the party?"?  

Major General Brims: There were different permutations at that stage. The structure that I described at the start, that which we actually went with, by New Year that was the structure, to go there; all planning before then was with a range of different structures.

Q543  Mr Howarth: So there were a number of options?  

Major General Brims: There were options, there were plans, there was nothing sufficiently firmed up.

Q544  Mr Howarth: Did you have a clear view in your own mind as to what the best British contribution could be?  

Major General Brims: To do what, where?

Q545  Mr Howarth: To achieve the objective that the Americans were looking for everyone to achieve, in conjunction with the British?  

Major General Brims: What, coming from Kuwait?

Q546  Mr Howarth: Indeed; because it was planned that we would come from Turkey?  

Major General Brims: To come from Kuwait to do it, the best structure would be the one I was given. If I had gone somewhere else, it would not have been that structure.

Q547  Mr Howarth: I think I follow, General. But did your detailed planning change between January, when you suggest things firmed up and the options were considered, and March? There was talk, at some stage during that period, of the United States looking to rely more heavily on air power and on lighter ground forces; were you aware of that, were you in that loop?  

Major General Brims: No. I am completely outside that loop. I was given a plan that I developed, without any huge change from January through to March; because, at some part of January, I was planning to come from Kuwait. So it is from early January that I was informed that I would have the task organisation, or probably have that task organisation, and probably come from Kuwait; I think it was January 20'ish that the Government made the decision that that was what would happen.

Q548  Mr Howarth: It must have taken quite a substantial reconsideration of how you were going to move from one set of tactics to a completely different set of tactics?  

Major General Brims: I do not think so. I think we have got sufficiently agile, flexible forces to be able to do that.

Q549  Mr Howarth: Were the Americans impressed?  

Major General Brims: You would have to ask them. I commanded 24 Air Mobile Brigade myself, and when I commanded 24 Air Mobile Brigade we went on operations, and my logistics support, not under my command, came from the then Colonel Cowlam.

Q550  Jim Knight: Just briefly, Brigadier, I wanted to ask a similar question. I appreciate your responsibilities were about logistics in theatre and not supplies from the UK, but at what stage did you start being involved in planning for that, given that inevitably you were going to get a really short time window to get everything distributed out to where it needed to go?  

Brigadier Cowlam: The time line involved in my own Headquarters was roughly the same as that mentioned by the General, although personally I was not involved in the senior commanders' seminars in the States, but we did send members of staff to assist with the Division's team, and we were in consultation with PJHQ, through October, November, December, helping them and offering them staff assistance in their contingency planning, to give them a view of what capability could be provided and what time lines. So we were aware particularly of the northern option, as a contingency plan that was being developed, and we contributed to it as best we could.

Q551  Jim Knight: And given "just in time" and that that requires certain assumptions, certain types of campaign would require certain types of ammunition, and you would have to make sure that all that was going to come through?  

Brigadier Cowlam: Our assumptions were based on the assumptions which we were working on. I challenge that they are "just in time", I think that is a bit of jargon that people have grasped to describe what we were doing, but certainly we do not have, I think, a British military logistics philosophy which is based on "just in time", certainly not for operational logistics. The contributions we were making were on our capability, how quickly, how far, how we would organise ourselves and what resources we would need to do a range of tasks over a range of distances.

Q552  Jim Knight: And during that planning phase, are there points at which it is the job of your logisticians to say, "Sorry, folks, you just can't plan to be able to do that, because I'm not going to be able to get the stuff out there in time"?  

Brigadier Cowlam: The overall estimate does take logistics into account, and we listen to what the commander would like to do and then we do various staff checks, working out how we would achieve that. But I do not recollect any stage where we said, "That's a no-hoper, we can't do it," it was more a case of what additional resources and how would we go around arranging ourselves to enable the commander to have the greatest freedom of action.

Q553  Mr Cran: Gentlemen, still under the heading of Preparation and Planning, the literature that is building up around the campaign that we are talking about suggests that the campaign set off 48 hours before that which was originally planned, as a result of the possibilities being provided by the decapitation raids; and, indeed, also it is suggested that the campaign really started two weeks earlier than you were ready for it. Would you like to comment on both those propositions?  

Major General Brims: Yes. To take the second one, no, we were ready. Of course, you could spend more time, although actually we had declared certain dates that we would be ready and we were inside that, so we were ready. The operation, in the final analysis, D-day, that is the language, D-day and H Hour did get pulled forward, first by 24 hours and then by another 24 hours. That was partly because, as I understand it, there were some opportunity targets for deep air to do, but I think that we had always decided that we wanted to get the land campaign launched early so that we could try to capture the oil infrastructure intact, and, in the final analysis, as I understand it, there were thoughts that the oil infrastructure was in danger of being trashed; and therefore, the decision, because we were bounced to go early, we did.

Q554  Mr Cran: The reason I think I asked the question was not only because that is what is being suggested, not, I may say, by the people at the sharp end, of course, you have contradicted that, but I think essentially for the question that Mr Knight put to you. Because it seems to us, at least, having gone out and spoken to some of the components of the force that you commanded, that really they were, in a sense, superbly professional people, of course, and we associate ourselves with your remarks, but, nonetheless, they had difficulties in the sense that the equipment was not always with them at the time. And therefore this whole question of whether it all started off quicker than you wanted really fits into that question, does it not?  

Major General Brims: Certainly, if you come from my perspective, we were ready; if you work from their perspective, certain of the units would say they were not ready, because, the last Brigade, we came in Brigade by Brigade, so the first one ready was 3 Commando Brigade, then 16 Air Assault Brigade and then 7 Armoured Brigade, and we defined readiness, the readiness to be able to conduct the plan that we had agreed, would be where we had two battle groups of 7 Armoured Brigade ready, and that was the definition of readiness. Now, if you went and saw the two battle groups of 7 Armoured Brigade that were not the two that were declared the first ready, they would tell you that they were not ready, but the Division was; if that is a reasonable explanation. And the two battle groups, the last two battle groups in were the Scots Dragoon Guards and 2 RTR, but, I may say, they did do the catch-up and they caught up remarkably quickly, and, with all their professionalism, skill and determination, they made light of that; but, from their perspective, they would be entirely accurate to say that they were not ready at that stage.

Q555  Mr Cran: Then just so that I get this absolutely clear, and I think you have made it quite clear, I just am circling in my mind as to at what point do you, and, of course, you, Brigadier, say to yourself, because it cannot be 100% prepared, it just cannot be, because of how life is, and logistics, and all the rest of it, where are we; where does the point arrive when you say, "Fine; we're ready"?  

Major General Brims: The judgment is reached, partly you can do it by defining the numbers of troops that you need by capability and volume.

Q556  Mr Cran: With their equipment with them as well?  

Major General Brims: Yes. And you agree that with the coalition and the national chain of command, and we had defined that, and the definition was 2 Battle Groups of 7 Brigade. That is in a scientific way. But, ultimately, you know when they are ready when you look them in the eye, and the person I would turn to, to reach the judgment, would be the Commander, in this case, of 7 Armoured Brigade, and the opportunity to go forward and see the commanders and some of the troops of the two, well, all battle groups in question, but certainly those two battle groups.

Q557  Mr Cran: I understand all of that, and just to get another one just quite straight. The commentators were saying that you were planning for something two weeks later, or thereabouts; was that true, or not, or had you a much more flexible approach to this?  

Major General Brims: I have no idea what the commentators said.

Q558  Mr Cran: Well, we have to rely on them occasionally?  

Major General Brims: It is complete news to me. I was ready to go, and I thought we would go and we did, and we were called forward and we could do it.  

Mr Cran: Chairman, I am happy with that.

Q559  Chairman: Yes; we met some of the guys yesterday. I would prefer to talk to the quartermaster before asking if they were ready to roll, but you know the situation far better than I do.  

Major General Brims: I see what you mean, yes; ah, but the commander would talk to the quartermaster too.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 4 November 2003