Select Committee on Education and Skills Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 4

Letter from Sir William Stubbs to Ms Kathleen Tattersall, Director-General, AQA (QCA 27)

  Thank you for your letter of 22 March.

  I do appreciate that the awarding bodies and regulatory authorities all worked hard to ensure that preparations for the awards of the new AS and A levels have been as thorough as possible. I am concerned that the public have confidence in the new A levels. That is why we commissioned the review by Eva Baker and her colleagues. The independent panel's report mentions the tendency of grade percentages being rounded up if, when attempting to maintain comparability between two years, there is an upward rather than downward movement in the face of uncertainty.

  I am conscious of the importance of judgements about candidates' actual performances. However, in this summer's A level awards, the change to new specifications means that awarders have less evidence to assist them than in normal circumstances. In this situation, I do expect last year's A level results to provide a very strong guide to this year's outcomes.

  I am clear that grades for this summer's A level candidates can only be determined using a combination of professional judgement and statistical evidence. To ignore eiehter of these dimensions and constrain awards would be contrary to the Code of Practice, risk serious disadvantages to candidates, and ought to be the cause of serious concern for the accountable officers of awarding bodies.

19 April 2002


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 14 April 2003