Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 500-512)

WEDNESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2002

MR MIKE TOMLINSON

  500. Was it unique the grade thresholds were changed this year for individual modules?  (Mr Tomlinson) It was not unique, no.

  501. In paragraph 64 of your report you talk about criterion-referencing and you say, "Effective use of statistical information will provide results which are closer to those that would result from effective criterion-referencing". Is that not like saying that genetically modified food is more authentic than the real thing?  (Mr Tomlinson) No. What that is saying is there is no such thing as a perfect criterion-referencing system.

  502. Nowhere. Nowhere in the world?  (Mr Tomlinson) No. Once you have criteria you are open to different interpretations of those criteria by different people and different interpretations of the work they are looking at against those criteria. It is not an absolute science. You can get close, we are close in this country, possibly closer than many others, but at the end of the day you cannot be perfect. However, statistics help you to get closer to that perfection.

  503. Are you satisfied that overall in looking at the syllabuses of all three examining boards across all subjects the detail of the specifications are sufficiently close to criteria and reference principle or is there room for a greater degree of specificity?  (Mr Tomlinson) I think in some subjects that I have seen, I must say I have not seen and read every single one of them, in those I have seen, it is a small minority of cases, there could be much tighter specifications to help. That, of course, relates to some of the issues that have been raised in the reports.

  Mr Chaytor: Thank you.

Chairman

  504. You talked about the "frenzy" in the summer, who is responsible for stoking that frenzy, was it the Headmaster and Headmistresses Conference, was it the Today programme?  (Mr Tomlinson) The frenzy that I refer to is an annual one, the annual frenzy as soon as results come out, how some people are unwilling to accept that as a result of harder work and better teaching more students can achieve the standards. We cannot call for improved standards and then as soon as we begin to have them appear, and they are appearing, we suddenly decide they cannot be real, somebody has lowered the boundary. I find that very, very unacceptable. If that boundary, that standard, is not being maintained year-on-year then I think those people are right to raise those questions. One of the issues I raised very clearly in my report is I do not think we can lurch from answering that question from crisis to crisis, there needs to be a systematic, consistent approach to looking at where the standards are being maintained all of the time. If they are not we have to be honest and do something about it. If they are we have to accept the outcome and we have students achieving better than they did previously. After all that is what we want. We do not want it at the cost of lowering standards.

  505. When the second part of your inquiry was published Sir William Stubbs reported your inquiry exonerated him by implication, he should never have been sacked.  (Mr Tomlinson) I make no comment on Sir William Stubbs. There is a process in train.

  506. You can exercise parliamentary privilege. We cannot get you to say anything nasty, even about the Today programme!  (Mr Tomlinson) I apologise for not putting blood on the carpet. I am more interested in making sure students get what they deserve and that is not achieved by putting blood on the carpet, it is about dealing with the system.

  507. You banged the table with your finger, Mr Tomlinson!

Mr Turner

  508. Mr Tomlinson, is an AS level worth half an A-Level?  (Mr Tomlinson) It is at the moment, yes, by definition.

  509. Even though both the former secretary of state and Dr Boston say that the AS paper is easier than the A2 paper?  (Mr Tomlinson) Of course it is, an A-Level paper in the past contained an easier group of questions and a hard group of questions. When you are testing over a two year period any A-Level paper, any student and any teacher will point out, there are an easier set of questions and there are harder ones.

  510. One qualification is based on easier—  (Mr Tomlinson) It is based on one year of study, not two. I would argue that your maturity level, your capacity to synthesise and to analyse increases and improves not necessarily linearly but it does improve. You can ask more difficult and demanding questions after two years than you can after one.

  511, What about somebody who takes an A-Level at the age of 30?  (Mr Tomlinson) They are judged by that standard and very often they do well because they bring to bear an awful lot of maturity and experience.

Mr Pollard

  512. Are you satisfied that vocational examinations are okay?  (Mr Tomlinson) I am insofar as I have looked at them partly because they do not follow the model of the AS and A2, all units are graded at the same level.

  Chairman: Mr Tomlinson, we promised to release you at 10.45, it is now 10.45. We have found this a most useful session. Thank you very much.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 14 April 2003