Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 200-207)

WEDNESDAY 18 DECEMBER 2002

MR DAVID MILIBAND MP

Ms Munn

  200. Sheffield is not the only city where there is quite a lot of segregation between the well-off people in certain areas and less well-off people in other areas. The majority of children in Sheffield go to their local school and they are coming from a community which is either doing very well or not doing very well. Is there any evidence yet that specialist schools are having an impact on the wider community in the way that I think it was hoped they might?
  (Mr Miliband) I think there are examples of specialist schools using their facilities in imaginative and positive ways and having a beacon effect, but we have got to do more. I am excited by the prospects of some of the city academies which we did not talk about. In the second priority I referred to of specialism and collaboration one form of specialism comes through the innovation that the academies represent. They are talking about new structures of management and learning, they are pioneering all year opening, being genuine centres of the whole community. There is significant Government investment going into those academies and I think the halo effect is potentially quite large and important. As I said earlier, one of the weaker aspects of the specialist school programme is in relation to the community use and we have to work on that.

  201. One of the schools which I visited as part of the Select Committee's visit to Birmingham was Castle Vale School, which was quite inspirational, and that was serving a very white working class area. One of the kids said to me, "Since we have become performing arts my mum is always saying `When can I come up to school?' whereas she was never interested before" and that has obviously had a beneficial impact on her daughter's education. It seems to me that you have probably got a community out there of people who were turned off by learning from their own schooling experiences. Is there anything you can do, working in a joined-up way with your Minister who has responsibility for lifelong learning, to look at whether there are opportunities perhaps to be supporting schools like that where there is the potential to get people back into learning?
  (Mr Miliband) You and I discussed on my last visit here the temptation for ministers to think that for every problem there should be a programme or even for every good idea there should be a programme solution and we have to try and resist the temptation to do that. I want to be wary of saying that with every good school I find I should create a programme to support what it is doing. What we have to do is try and create a system that creates the right incentives (a) to share the information (b) to share the practice and (c) to put the money in. The money goes in from the bottom up rather than from the top down. We can help a bit by sponsoring innovation. There is an extended schools project which is not just about wider opening hours but it is about community schools in the sense of providing health and other facilities which I think is interesting and potentially a real hub of community re-education. I do not want education to have to wait for health and leisure and libraries to get their act together before we really plough on. I think schools that have a good relationship with their local community can make sure their facilities are more widely used and I think the development of out of hours and summer programmes is really an important part of that.

Valerie Davey

  202. There is one last issue, Minister, which we would like to raise with you before you go and that is the A-level standards and the work of the QCA and to ask whether you are satisfied that the Department is now implementing what you believe to be the core recommendations of Tomlinson?
  (Mr Miliband) Most importantly, the QCA is implementing the recommendations of Tomlinson, but to the extent that they apply to us I think we are taking them seriously. The new leaders of the QCA, Ken Boston and Sir Anthony Greener, have both made a very impressive start. They are absolutely determined to make the QCA an institution with a genuinely high reputation. There are implications for us in relation to the memorandum of understanding that would govern our relationship to the QCA and we are taking that seriously and we are all utterly focused on making sure that the 2,000 students who this year got the wrong overall grades and the 10,000 who got the wrong unit grades never happens again and we are working on putting the systems in place to make that happen and that is primarily a responsibility for the QCA, but to the extent that we can help, we are doing so and the Secretary of State has announced a significant sum of money, up to £6 million, to help support that.

  203. The relationship between the Government and the QCA, is that going to come under further scrutiny?
  (Mr Miliband) I think the Tomlinson Report warned that we should not prejudice the efficiency improvements that are necessary in the short-term with structural change, that is why he advocated a memorandum of understanding. I think the Secretary of State has made clear that we have not closed our mind to institutional change in the direction of a more independent QCA, but our absolute priority at the moment is to make sure that the examination system has the organisational structure and resources to be run efficiently and effectively so that people do have confidence that they are getting the grades they deserve.

  204. Are you satisfied you know how the £6 million that is going to the QCA is going to be spent? Will it go to them or is it going to go to the schools?
  (Mr Miliband) It will not go to schools, it will go to pay for examiners and other key parts of the infrastructure. I think the new team in the QCA is getting stuck into its work in an impressive way and I think we should back them because when you appoint people you should support them.

Jonathan Shaw

  205. There is concern about the number of examiners available. You say that you have provided the additional £6 million which NCSL has welcomed. The pay for doing the marking on things like Key Stage 2 is very low, is it not? I understand that it is about £5 an hour.
  (Mr Miliband) Ken Boston described it as a cottage industry in his evidence. I think all aspects of this industry need to be looked at and that includes pay.

  206. I want to give you some idea of what you have to do for that £5 an hour. A very experienced headteacher advised me that she gets £2.75 per script for Key Stage 2 during which time they have to test the spelling, handwriting, reading and writing and then there is a whole series of administrative checks that they have to do as well. Doing that for £5 an hour on top of her other job I think means she is not going to be looking to do it next year, which is a concern.
  (Mr Miliband) Take it from me, if you think you are concerned, I do not want to be back here in a year's time with you beating me over the head about this. We have said very clearly that we will do whatever the QCA recommend is necessary to get it done. When the Secretary of State made his statement to the House we did not get any ideas back from our own side or from the Opposition. If anyone does have any bright ideas, please speak now or forever hold your peace. The QCA are on to the pay rates for examiners issue.

Valerie Davey

  207. Minister, I think schools and colleges can be well assured that you are looking carefully at this and I hope will have more confidence in the system. We have come to the end of a long session at the end of quite an engaging time during the whole of this session. Can we say thank you very much indeed for coming at the end of term and can we wish you a very happy break for Christmas and the New Year.
  (Mr Miliband) Thank you very much. I am happy to reciprocate that.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 6 May 2003