Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


3. Memorandum submitted by the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) (DP42)

SCHOOL STATUS AND SPECIALISM: AN ANALYSIS OF INSPECTION AND EXAMINATION DATA

INTRODUCTION

  1.  This analysis covers three aspects of secondary school diversity. One is the status of the schools, which are categorised for this purpose as voluntary aided/voluntary controlled, foundation and community. The second dimension is specialism, that is, designation as a specialist school for technology, languages, arts or sports. Schools with such a designation may be of any status. The third dimension is selection by general ability.

STATUS

  2.  The GCSE results for 2002 for the three types of status are shown in Chart 1. Average point score per pupil is the measure used.


  3.  Chart 2 shows the relationship between free school meal percentage and the average points score.


  4.  Data from Section 10 Ofsted inspections provide another perspective. The data used in this paper are taken from inspections undertaken in the period 2000-02 and relate to the following numbers of schools:
Voluntary schools241 (including 135 Roman Catholic and
64 Church of England schools)
Foundation schools162
Community Schools787


  5.  Six inspection judgements have been selected as a basis for comparison. These are:

    —  the quality of teaching;

    —  the quality of leadership and management of the headteacher and key staff;

    —  the quality and range of the learning opportunities;

    —  behaviour, including the incidence of exclusions;

    —  how well the pupils achieve; and

    —  the overall effectiveness of the school.

CONTEXT

  6.  An indication of the context of the schools inspected is given below. Free school meals (FSM) is the commonly used indicator of the educational advantage or disadvantage of the pupil intake. Chart 3 shows that the range of FSM is greatest in community schools and smallest in foundation schools. The median in foundation schools is almost half that in community schools.


  7.  Chart 4 shows that the range of the percentage of pupils identified by the school as having special educational needs is similar in foundation, voluntary and community schools, although the median is significantly higher in community schools than in the other two categories.


  8.  Chart 5 gives the distribution of ethnic minority pupils.


Inspection judgements

  10.  Chart 7 shows that the quality of teaching is highest in foundation schools, where 87% of the teaching is good or better. This compares with 83% in voluntary schools and 73% in community schools.


  11.  Chart 8 shows that the quality of leadership and management is judged highest in the foundation schools, with 85% being good or better. This compares with 82% in voluntary schools and 78% in community schools.


  12.  The quality and range of learning opportunities, as shown in chart 9, is highest in foundation schools, where 73% is good or better. This is well ahead of the 53% in voluntary schools and 47% in community schools.


  13.  Chart 10 shows that behaviour is judged best in foundation schools (86% good or better) and voluntary schools (85%). In community schools behaviour is good or better in 78% of schools.


  14.  The inspectors' judgements of how well pupils achieve take account of the progress made by pupils, the level of demand placed on them and other relevant factors.

  15.  Chart 11 indicates that there is no difference in how well pupils achieve in relation to their ability in voluntary and foundation schools, with 74% good or better. Among community schools 58% are judged good or better in this respect.


  16.  In terms of their overall effectiveness, Chart 12 shows that voluntary schools are rated as good or better in 79% of schools. This compares with 78% in foundation schools and 62% in community schools.


  17.  Chart 13 shows the percentage of schools of each types judged to need special measures or to have serious weaknesses in their last inspection.


Specialism

  18.  The GCSE results for 2002 for the specialist schools against all others schools, are shown in Chart 14.


  19.  The average points score for specialist schools, and all other schools, against the percentage of free school meals, is shown in Chart 15.


Context

  20.  An indication of the context of the specialist schools inspected is given below. Free school meals (FSM) is the commonly used indicator of the educational advantage or disadvantage of the pupil intake.


  21.  Chart 17 shows the range of the percentage of pupils identified by the school as having special educational needs.


  22.  Chart 18 gives the distribution of ethnic minority pupils.


  23.  Chart 19 gives the distribution of pupils having English as an additional language.


  24.  Chart 20 gives a comparison between specialist schools and all other schools in relation to teaching.


  25.  Chart 21 looks at leadership and management.


  26.  Chart 22 looks at the quality and range of learning opportunities.


  27.  Chart 23 looks at behaviour.


  28.  Chart 24 looks at how well pupils achieve.


  29.  Chart 25 gives the judgement of the overall effectiveness of the school.


  30.  Chart 26 gives the distributions of specialist schools judged to need special measures or to have serious weaknesses in their last inspection.


Selection by General Ability

  31.  This section analyses GCSE results in grammar and secondary modern schools.

Context

  32.  An indication of the context of schools is given in Chart 27.


  33.  Chart 28 shows the relationship between the free school meal percentage and the average points score.


November 2002





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 22 May 2003