3. Memorandum submitted by the Office
for Standards in Education (Ofsted) (DP42)
SCHOOL STATUS AND SPECIALISM: AN ANALYSIS
OF INSPECTION AND EXAMINATION DATA
INTRODUCTION
1. This analysis covers three aspects of
secondary school diversity. One is the status of the schools,
which are categorised for this purpose as voluntary aided/voluntary
controlled, foundation and community. The second dimension is
specialism, that is, designation as a specialist school for technology,
languages, arts or sports. Schools with such a designation may
be of any status. The third dimension is selection by general
ability.
STATUS
2. The GCSE results for 2002 for the three
types of status are shown in Chart 1. Average point score per
pupil is the measure used.

3. Chart 2 shows the relationship between
free school meal percentage and the average points score.

4. Data from Section 10 Ofsted inspections
provide another perspective. The data used in this paper are taken
from inspections undertaken in the period 2000-02 and relate to
the following numbers of schools:
Voluntary schools | 241 (including 135 Roman Catholic and
64 Church of England schools)
|
Foundation schools | 162 |
Community Schools | 787 |
5. Six inspection judgements have been selected as a
basis for comparison. These are:
the quality of teaching;
the quality of leadership and management of the
headteacher and key staff;
the quality and range of the learning opportunities;
behaviour, including the incidence of exclusions;
how well the pupils achieve; and
the overall effectiveness of the school.
CONTEXT
6. An indication of the context of the schools inspected
is given below. Free school meals (FSM) is the commonly used indicator
of the educational advantage or disadvantage of the pupil intake.
Chart 3 shows that the range of FSM is greatest in community schools
and smallest in foundation schools. The median in foundation schools
is almost half that in community schools.

7. Chart 4 shows that the range of the percentage of
pupils identified by the school as having special educational
needs is similar in foundation, voluntary and community schools,
although the median is significantly higher in community schools
than in the other two categories.

8. Chart 5 gives the distribution of ethnic minority
pupils.
</I> percentages
across voluntary, foundation and community schools, although the
range is considerably larger in community schools than in the
other two.<BR>
<P>
<CENTER><IMG SRC=)
Inspection judgements
10. Chart 7 shows that the quality of teaching is
highest in foundation schools, where 87% of the teaching is good
or better. This compares with 83% in voluntary schools and 73%
in community schools.

11. Chart 8 shows that the quality of leadership and
management is judged highest in the foundation schools, with
85% being good or better. This compares with 82% in voluntary
schools and 78% in community schools.

12. The quality and range of learning opportunities,
as shown in chart 9, is highest in foundation schools, where 73%
is good or better. This is well ahead of the 53% in voluntary
schools and 47% in community schools.

13. Chart 10 shows that behaviour is judged best in foundation
schools (86% good or better) and voluntary schools (85%). In community
schools behaviour is good or better in 78% of schools.

14. The inspectors' judgements of how well pupils achieve
take account of the progress made by pupils, the level of demand
placed on them and other relevant factors.
15. Chart 11 indicates that there is no difference in
how well pupils achieve in relation to their ability in voluntary
and foundation schools, with 74% good or better. Among community
schools 58% are judged good or better in this respect.

16. In terms of their overall effectiveness, Chart 12
shows that voluntary schools are rated as good or better in 79%
of schools. This compares with 78% in foundation schools and 62%
in community schools.

17. Chart 13 shows the percentage of schools of each
types judged to need special measures or to have serious weaknesses
in their last inspection.

Specialism
18. The GCSE results for 2002 for the specialist schools
against all others schools, are shown in Chart 14.

19. The average points score for specialist schools,
and all other schools, against the percentage of free school meals,
is shown in Chart 15.

Context
20. An indication of the context of the specialist schools
inspected is given below. Free school meals (FSM) is the commonly
used indicator of the educational advantage or disadvantage of
the pupil intake.

21. Chart 17 shows the range of the percentage of pupils
identified by the school as having special educational needs.

22. Chart 18 gives the distribution of ethnic minority
pupils.

23. Chart 19 gives the distribution of pupils having
English as an additional language.

24. Chart 20 gives a comparison between specialist schools
and all other schools in relation to teaching.

25. Chart 21 looks at leadership and management.

26. Chart 22 looks at the quality and range of learning
opportunities.

27. Chart 23 looks at behaviour.

28. Chart 24 looks at how well pupils achieve.

29. Chart 25 gives the judgement of the overall effectiveness
of the school.

30. Chart 26 gives the distributions of specialist schools
judged to need special measures or to have serious weaknesses
in their last inspection.

Selection by General Ability
31. This section analyses GCSE results in grammar and
secondary modern schools.
Context
32. An indication of the context of schools is given
in Chart 27.

33. Chart 28 shows the relationship between the free
school meal percentage and the average points score.

November 2002
|