Select Committee on Education and Skills Memoranda


Secondary Admissions: School Admissions

Summary of Evidence provided by Paul Robinson

The London Context

Features:
  • Hierarchy of schools in the eyes of parents which condition choice and satisfaction with the system.

  • Large number of different admission authorities, a mixture of admission criteria and appeal arrangements.

  • Significant movement of pupils across borough boundaries.

  • Secondary schools with a large number of feeder primary schools.

  • Highly developed independent sector, which attracts a higher percentage of able and motivated pupils than the national average.

  • Large number of multiple acceptances of offers effectively blocking the offers to other children - a state of affairs, which will be largely though not totally eradicated by the new co-ordinated admissions, arrangements.

  • Variable picture in terms of transition and attainment between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3.

  • High pupil mobility means that in most LEAs there is a significant but changing group of children without a school place in-year (ie outside the normal admission round). Most LEAs do not have a common source of information, for schools for which they are not the admission authority, on which children are admitted and who is on waiting lists. When LEAs track children with no school place it is difficult to obtain up to date information, particularly for children getting school places in neighbouring LEAs.

  • As vacancies appear in all year groups in successful schools during the year (because of mobility) this often means places are offered to pupils on waiting lists who already have a place in another school rather than placing children with no school place.

A few of the issues:

  • Building confidence and trust in the whole system.

  • Balancing the interest of individual schools with a wider corporate responsibility to support the interests of all pupils.

  • Cracking the conundrum of admissions outside the normal admissions round.

  • Reducing the negative influences on the transition between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3 and building on the positive.




 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 14 November 2003