Select Committee on Environmental Audit Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum from the Co-operative Insurance Society

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Co-operative Insurance Society (CIS) is the insurance arm of Co-operative Financial Services (CFS), a group that provides a range of banking, insurance, savings and pensions products to more than seven million people across the UK with an annual income of £2.5 billion and assets of more than £27 billion. It is part of the Co-operative Group, which is one of the largest consumer-owned business in the world.

  2.  CIS employs more than ten thousand people in more than 160 sites across the UK. Over four thousand of these are based at the chief office complex in Manchester.

CIS'S COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY

  3.  Historically, CIS has always conducted its business following the co-operative values and principles of honesty, openness, social responsibility and caring for others. CIS made this approach a business priority in 1999 with the introduction of a programme which outlined CIS's approach to dealing with to all its stakeholders in a set of four key commitments. The commitment to sustainability says that CIS aims "to grow our business for the benefit of our customers, with due regard for the interests of employees and the wider community."

  4.  Though the insurance industry has relatively low direct impacts, it does have an important role in influencing customer behaviour and addressing the social, ethical and environmental performance of its investments. It also experiences the consequences of the social, ethical and environmental problems of unsustainable behaviour. It can clearly be seen that drugs misuse is reflected in theft from property, climate change has implications for house flooding, and the pollution from traffic congestion can have implications for life assurance claims. On a wider scale, the business risk from unsustainable behaviour can be reflected in investment returns and, in the financial services industry, a lack of trust in company behaviour is a deterrent to customers.

BUILDING A CORPORATE CULTURE OF SUSTAINABILITY

  5.  CIS has established a number of structures and policies to ensure that the commitment to sustainability is embedded in day-to-day business practice.

  6.  A network of individuals, known as values facilitators, was established to act as individual advocates in teams and departments for the social accountability programme and to convey information back to their own departments and offices. These facilitators have ongoing training in a range of issues related to the programme.

  7.  New starters attend a session on sustainability issues as part of their induction programme. This is the ideal forum to inform new staff about these issues and ensures that they receive a message consistent with the culture developed and maintained by the facilitators.

  8.  All managers have a duty to consider sustainability issues as part of their job description. In addition, specific social ethical and/or environmental targets are assigned as part of their performance management and are considered as part of the performance-related pay system. The executive management team show their commitment to pursuing sustainability as part of CIS's overall business strategy.

  9.  Participation in external bodies is used to inform and educate the executive management team. For example, CIS Chief Executive, Mervyn Pedelty, sits on the board of Business in the Community, CIS's Chief Operating Officer, Finian O'Boyle, sits on the board of Sustainability North West and senior managers are encouraged to take leading roles in sustainability initiatives within their specialist fields, for example the Head of Property and Facilities, Gary Thomas, sits on a steering committee as part of the Department of Trade and Industry funded "Partners in Innovation" project looking at "Managing Buildings Sustainably."

TACKLING THE BARRIERS TO INCREASING SUSTAINABLE PRACTICE

  10.  Many of the existing efforts and initiatives to promote and embed sustainable behaviour are not effective. Knowledge of existing Government campaigns amongst the workforce is poor and levels of sustainability education are so low that the messages of these campaigns do not register with many people.

  11.  The poor level of education and knowledge about sustainability is evident across CIS's workforce. Introducing any new sustainability initiative requires that this significant education gap is addressed before the initiative itself can be taught and explained. People are less willing to change their behaviour if they don't understand why they should be working in a new way. In our experience staff cannot connect their actions with the consequences of what they are doing then they will not be motivated to change.

  12.  It is not enough to explain to staff about "effects on an ecosystem" or "implications for climate change" if they have not had the education to understand these basic scientific concepts. To change behaviour in these circumstances, CIS has to fill in the missing gaps in basic scientific education—gaps which would not be present if our workforce had the levels of scientific education that are evident in Japan, Scandinavia and Germany, where science is prioritised in the curriculum. The problem seems to be that the acquisition of a wide range of facts rather than the development of theory and learning skills seems to dominate the curriculum.

  13.  There is a multiplicity of sustainability initiatives which often overlap or duplicate activity. This leads to confusion for business and individuals seeking guidance on sustainability issues. There is too much poor quality information with little central direction or control. For example, in looking for advice and guidance in running a staff awareness programme, CIS identified more than 60 service providers all of which were subsidised through government or European funding. However few of these were sufficiently well-resourced to provide an effective service. Sustainability can be achieved more simply, effectively and efficiently by directing government funding towards more substantial support of fewer schemes, targeting those that have delivered tangible performance improvements.

  14.  The multiplicity of initiatives coupled with the lack of scientific education to make it extremely difficult for businesses and individual to make informed consumer choices. Without a solid foundation of knowledge, these initiatives can seem little more than "background noise" and their efforts can be wasted. To bridge this gap in the short term it is essential that the Government provides clear guidance and tangible examples of good sustainable practice, for example through encouraging consumers to buy renewable electricity, fair trade coffee and be able to help customers identify companies with good sustainable behaviour.

  15.  CIS is keen to direct our customers towards more sustainable services. For example, CIS works with its network of approved motor repairers to ensure that they repair rather than replace plastic items wherever possible and have better environmental management of areas such as paint shops and waste disposal. Customers still have the choice of where their car is repaired after an accident but are encouraged to take this more sustainable option.

  16.  Apathy is also a major problem in driving change. Staff often do not see how they relate sustainable behaviour to their day to day work. Providing the right incentives for staff is the key to tackling apathy. Staff perceive that sustainable behaviour is harder, more time consuming and more expensive than their current activity. For example, CIS now operates a recycling system using waste segregation—where items such a paper, vending cups and plastics are disposed of through a series of separate bins in an office. This scheme only achieved significant success by making it easier to recycle than dispose of waste through the removal of traditional desk waste bins.

  17.  Leading by example is a powerful way of tackling apathy and reluctance to introduce more sustainable behaviour. The companies that we invest in are often reluctant to introduce measures to identify and reduce climate change impact, such as through the use of renewable energy, saying that such measure are unfeasible or to expensive for a large business to implement. CIS is only able to effectively inform, educate and change the behaviour of the companies it invests in, if it can give credible evidence and show understanding of the implications of the changes it is asking for.

  18.  By monitoring our own climate change impact, and using renewable electricity for our own business, we are able to demonstrate the feasibility and provide advice on implementation of such actions for other organisations. In our experience a lack of examples of government agencies and departments implementing sustainable practices in their own activities deters other businesses from perceiving that sustainability is credible or achievable within business or communities.

  19.  Examples learned at work can help promote greater sustainable behaviour in the wider community. For example, CIS built on its work in improving energy management by arranging energy efficiency awareness day for staff, where they were able to obtain home energy efficiency reports and pick up free energy saving light bulbs.

  20.  CIS has found that existing business practices and departmental boundaries can be a barrier to sustainability. For example, the heat from the high number of computer screens in CIS's information technology department exceeded the capacity of the existing air conditioning system. The IT department requested an upgrade of the air conditioning system, which would have been the responsibility of the buildings department, but was reluctant to replace with cooler LCD computer screens, which would be a more sustainable and cheaper solution, as that expenditure would fall within the IT budget.

THE ROLE OF BUSINESSES IN EDUCATING EACH OTHER

  21.  One of the strongest motivators in encouraging sustainable development within an SME is where it has to demonstrate sustainable practice to secure business. This encourages the SME to learn about wider sustainability issues and for a two-way learning from the organisation it is supplying about process and shared objectives.

  22.  By including sustainability criteria in our procurement decisions, CIS has found it has been a substantial force for improving sustainability in its contractors, of which SMEs play an important part. But the level of knowledge of suppliers is such that CIS cannot include social and environmental product requirements in specifications without also educating the suppliers concerned in what these requirements mean and why they are important. For example, in a project to eliminate certain chemicals from products that we purchase we have discovered that it is necessary to educate our suppliers in techniques to identify product composition.

  23.  CIS has also found that some contractors have a lack of understanding of basic law and government policy. It is difficult to educate on sustainability issues until these basic knowledge gaps are dealt with. But once an SME is aware of the benefits of sustainability, the smaller size and simpler business model mean that sustainability improvements are quicker to introduce, easier to implement and simpler to evaluate.

THE CHALLENGES OF MASS EDUCATION IN THE WORKPLACE

  24.  To achieve environmental certification under ISO14001, CIS had to ensure a level of understanding of key issues across its entire workforce, encompassing needs from a diversity of education, ability, experience and working environment. To convey this information, we prepared an automatic presentation which could be run on individual's computers with the minimum level of technical expertise.

  25.  The diversity of the audience meant that we couldn't assume any previous knowledge, yet had to make sure the presentation was quick and interesting enough not to discourage those who did already had a level of knowledge. It was also important to make the presentation simple and quick enough to be viewed within the working pressures of a normal office day. The network of staff facilitators was used to ensure that all staff saw the presentation and to reinforce the messages it contained.

WORKING WITH OTHERS TO IMPROVE SUSTAINABILITY KNOWLEDGE

  26.  Though it is crucial to build a culture of sustainability if these issues are to be incorporated in our business operations, sustainable behaviour only comes about by changing day to day actions. Individual actions also allow the members of a diverse workforce to see how sustainability can be improved in practice. CIS's best results have come through providing the opportunity and mandate for individuals who already have sustainability values to be able to change the way they do things and put these values into practice, inspiring those around them to so the same.

  27.  In 2002, approximately 25 offices participated in Global Action Plan's Action at Work programme. The Action at Work programme was first piloted by CIS in 2001, using three claims offices. Global Action Plan is an environmental charity established to promote sustainable living at home, at school and in the workplace. They developed the Action at Work programme for large organisations to provide a way to reduce environmental impacts whilst achieving cost savings. The programme is based upon a network of Environment Champions representing each office. The Champions have been trained to carry out environmental awareness campaigns at their offices. Their aims are to reduce energy consumption, minimise waste and raise the environmental awareness of their colleagues. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the lessons learnt and cost savings achieved can be translated to the home as well as the office.

  28.  The Champions receive support and guidance from one of three mentors, each a volunteer from the offices involved in the pilot exercise. Support is also provided through a dedicated contact from Human Resources, as well as a programme manager from Global Action Plan. In the experience of CIS, this level of support is essential to the success of the project.

  29.  The programme is designed to run over a twelve month period, and is due to be completed in March of this year. Upon completion, if the offices have demonstrated that the aims of the programme have been met, each will receive a United Nations Award for Environmental Achievement. In the experience of CIS, the time frame and potential certificate at the end of the programme are seen as a manageable goal for the Environment Champions. The measures introduced by the offices during the programme are designed to be permanent fixtures, and emphasis is placed on this throughout the term of the project. In addition, taking part in this initiative has allowed CIS to gain knowledge, skills and experience that would allow it to run its own similar schemes across the rest of its business.

  30.  Although we appreciate the benefits of this scheme, it has been a significant expense for us. It is likely that this expense would be a strong disincentive for smaller companies or those that are less committed to sustainable development.

March 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 31 July 2003