Select Committee on Environmental Audit Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 380-388)

Tuesday 13 May 2003

Ms Penney Poyzer, EcoTeam, Ms Alison Goodchild, Tom Reacher, Elizabeth Braund, Ms Sarah Braund, Mr James Kraunsoe

  Q380  Mr Chaytor: Is there a known example of a member of an EcoTeam changing their transport habits as a result of that discussion, or is there someone who has changed their vehicle to an LPG vehicle?

  Mr Kraunsoe: We did have quite a long discussion about this one. For example, we live on a bus route and it comes to the end of the roads near us and then it goes back again and this is where it links in with local communities because there was a change to the timetable and we went along and said did you know it is going to restrict its times, you need to write in. We publicised some of the EcoTeams in the area and said write to the bus companies and say you want to keep the buses going. There was an opportunity to do that. We have had discussions about sharing lifts to go to farmers' market and things like that and three of us have met up to go in one car. Bike routes, again publicising where the bike routes are. I knew where they were, I just did not happen to use them and a couple of the others said they always get lost at the same point and I told them which way to go. There is an evening session on that topic.

  Ms Goodchild: People in the groups I did decided to get on their bike more often to go locally. You get into the habit of using your car, you just get in the car without a second thought to drive down the road or go to the local shops, but when you are in this EcoTeam process you start to become more conscious of what you are doing. It is really about making conscious decisions and thinking do I need to use my car to go down the road, it would be far better if I got on my bike or walked. I think it is part of that conscious process it helps to encourage.

  Q381  Mr Chaytor: If the EcoTeam concept came with a government label, if this were a central government scheme or if it was a local council scheme, do you think that would be an advantage or do you think there is an advantage in being in more of a bottom-up scheme that is promoted by a non-governmental organisation?

  Mr Kraunsoe: We like the local aspect of it, the way that it was something that was done in West Bridgford first and there were people you did not necessarily know but who did not live far away from who were telling you about that and that was good. There is no doubt that at times if there are no recycling centres near you and you cannot recycle you have got to say who is going to do that. You need council backing and occasionally you need an interface such as you can make a difference on things whereas with a group of six households you cannot do that. If there is nowhere to go then there is nothing you can do.

  Ms Poyzer: I think the powerful thing is having an intermediary organisation because quite often people think I am employed by Rushcliffe when actually I am not employed by Rushcliffe.

  Ms Goodchild: I think you can get into a whole different area.

  Ms Poyzer: Yes, things like why are my bins not being emptied. I think the really powerful thing about that, and you will be aware of the influence of a whole range of NGOs on sustainability, is that you are seen as independent, you have no axe to grind, but you are, strangely enough, working totally towards the strategic aims of the local authority. So they love us, we do get hugs and kisses when we go to meetings. Local authorities have been incredible at working with us, they have been absolutely brilliant. They are genuinely engaged, they are genuinely enthused. I had the benefit of working for local authorities previously so that did help. Rushcliffe Borough Council have been splendid, Notts County Council have been splendid, all the new partners that we are engaging with, Broxtowe, Moseley ward where we are going to be working, all of them have been ready to be engaged and to do this and they do genuinely want to achieve it. In terms of partnership working, it is pretty well spot on and funding is the absolute issue. I think if EcoTeams came with a sticker saying the Government support it we would have no problem with that at all because I think it would show genuine partnership working.

  Q382  Mr Chaytor: Do you know of any other schools that have developed a project like yours?

  Tom Reacher: Not really.

  Elizabeth Braund: I think ours was one of the first ones with children in it. I think they are all getting to grips with it at the moment, just thinking about it.

  Ms Poyzer: We are going to be working with Scouts groups, we are going to be working with Flintham school, I have just been speaking to the head teacher there about recycling facilities.

  Q383  Mrs Clark: Is this primary?

  Ms Poyzer: It is a primary school. There are about four schools that we are set up to work with.

  Q384  Chairman: I think we are coming towards the end of our session. I would just like to ask about one issue. You talked about this being very much step by step and I just wonder what message you would like to leave us with in terms of the steps that you have taken and perhaps what the next step should be.

  Elizabeth Braund: I think it would be really good if it was a topic you did at school, maybe in PSHE. That would make people more aware of it without them having to give up any of their time.

  Tom Reacher: In our village it has been in the newsletter every single month so everyone knows about it. If they had a chance to set up another EcoTeam in our village then people would be willing to take part in it because they have heard a lot about it and the success that it has had.

  Q385  Chairman: Do you think the local press give enough coverage to what you are doing?

  Tom Reacher: We have been in The Guardian and then the Newark Advertiser, which is our local paper, but that is it really.

  Q386  Chairman: So have you got a message for newspaper editors?

  Tom Reacher: Not really.

  Q387  Chairman: Alison?

  Ms Goodchild: I would really like to see it developed much further nationally because a lot of hard work has been put in locally. It started with one person from Holland who brought the programme over and I have been enthused by the number of people who actually wanted to take part in it and it is great that it has got to the stage it has got to, but I would really like to see it developed across the country.

  Mr Kraunsoe: It is easy to do and you can make a difference. My children are four and two and they will grow up with this recycling attitude, it is just the way it is done as opposed to it is a change. Nowadays people are seeing it as doing something slightly different.

  Ms Poyzer: We are being really careful about how we test this. We are really careful about how rigorous it is. I think how far we have got now and the fact that you have arrived today is purely a testament to local people. You were saying, James, about this magical recycling bin that turned up, but I have to say, it was a fortuitous time to ring them because they were thinking about it, I just pushed them a bit further. I think what it does is provide individuals with a voice. There is no doubt about it, when you ring up as the Rushcliffe EcoTeam's co-ordinator they do actually listen and make things happen because they know that there is a body of people there doing the stuff they want them to do and I think if it can work here there is no reason at all why it could not work across an awful lot of the country. Global Action Plan is currently putting in funding bids so that we can increase our work across Nottinghamshire initially, again working with affluent and rural and deprived areas as well, but we are hopeful that we will get funding to work in the South East and South West. I think it is a growing thing. I think there are very good reasons why local authorities are engaged by the idea, because they do see it as a method of delivery and I think the third partner thing, the people with no axe to grind delivering it does make it a lot easier for them and presents good value for money. It was identified by the Best Value Inspector at Rushcliffe as being a pretty good way to spend (3,500 a year.

  Q388  Chairman: Thank you for that. We have got a copy of the Learning the Sustainability Lesson with EcoTeams paper which you have kindly produced for us and we will make sure that that is included as official evidence and that will be on the record as well. I know that you have all taken time from work and school and other commitments of one kind or another, so thank you for that. I hope that we can stay in touch. You have got the details of our website. It may well be that some of our own report will give some added momentum to the next steps that each of us are making but particularly locally here. Thank you for your hospitality.

  Ms Poyzer: Can I say on behalf of the residents that we are all incredibly impressed that Members of Parliament have come to see us. Thank you.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 31 July 2003