Select Committee on Environmental Audit Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 477-479)

Thursday 22 May 2003

DR ANDY JOHNSTON

  Q477  Chairman: Good morning, Dr Johnston. You have been present for some of the previous session, so we very much hope that you have an inkling of the direction that our inquiry is going in. I welcome you to our Sub-Committee and I should like to say how much we appreciate the work of Forum for the Future, which is helping to develop the overall strategy in terms of sustainable development and education. Is there anything that you wish to add to the submission that you have already made to us?

  Dr Johnston: At this point, there is nothing I wish to add, but I will re-state the key points to help the debate move along. We are talking about a move away from education for sustainable development towards learning for sustainable development, the emphasis on the learning being the whole exercise; a recognition that that requires building of capacity within all sorts of training providers within the sector, but also within professional associations, regulatory bodies and all sorts of players within the education field; and that a lot of work needs to be done on demystifying the concept of sustainable development so that at least we can get on with doing something rather than endlessly debating what it means.

  Q478  Mr Challen: What approach is Forum taking with higher educational institutions in regard to the HEPS initiative?

  Dr Johnston: We have a two-strand approach: individual engagement with 18 partner universities, where the strategy is to identify where the institution is going, what it is trying to achieve, and how to do that in the most sustainable way possible. Under those circumstances, we operate within the framework of that particular institution. We also have programme-wide initiatives where we are picking up on—what are the things which is keeping vice-chancellors awake at night generally across the sector, and how is it that the sustainable development agenda can possibly help them to solve those problems on a sector-wide basis.

  Q479  Mr Challen: What priorities does HEPS give to integrating sustainable development into the curriculum?

  Dr Johnston: That, I would say, is the number one priority. If I was to draw a distinction between the previous discussion and this one, it is that we do see that there is an important role for courses, which are called sustainable development, or their main purpose is some sort of sustainable development—professionalisation, if you like. However, by far and away the most important agenda is how to get the existing professions to behave in a more sustainable way—what does it mean for a chemist or an engineer? That is, I think, the big agenda.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 31 July 2003