Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

EC WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (2000/60/EC)

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  This note provides additional information requested by the EFRA Select Committee on:

    —  Internal borders in relation to Wales and Scotland with England and Northern Ireland with the Republic of Ireland on River Basin Management Plans and accountability; and

    —  Defra's administration costs for the Water Framework Directive.

2.  INTERNAL BORDERS IN RELATION TO WALES AND SCOTLAND WITH ENGLAND, AND NORTHERN IRELAND WITH THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND—RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Cross-border river basin districts in Great Britain

  2.1  Maps of the proposed river basin districts are included at appendix 5 of the Second Consultation Paper. Four proposed districts will cross internal borders.

  2.2  The Directive allows individual river basins to be combined to form a "district". In most cases, the proposed districts will include more than one river basin. In the case of the Wales-England border, it is proposed that there should be two cross-border districts: the Severn and the Dee. In each case these districts will comprise a single river basin. It follows that a river basin management plan will have to be prepared for each of these two districts, and a programme of measures will have to be established.

  2.3  As for England-Scotland, two river basins are proposed which would cross the border: the Tweed basin and the English part of the river Esk draining into the Solway estuary. One option being considered is combining these two basin into one river basin district. A small number of tributaries of the North Tyne also rise in Scotland before flowing into England. Since only a small area of the river basin lies in Scotland, it is proposed that it be combined with a neighbouring basin lying wholly in England, such as the Tees, into a single river basin district.

  2.4  Arrangements in Northern Ireland are described in paragraph 2.20-21.

  2.5  The environment agencies of the UK (the Environment Agency, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) and in Northern Ireland the Environment and Heritage Service) have a well established track record in joint-working on the Water Framework Directive as illustrated through the UK Technical Advisory Group (UKTAG). The Group brings together both the environment and conservation agencies and was set up to coordinate technical implementation of the Directive across the UK.

  2.6  UKTAG, has for example, developed guidance for the Community Implementation Strategy and produced a core text from which the Environment Agency's consultation on the Directive Guiding Principles on the Technical Requirements was drawn.

England-Wales

Competent authority

  2.7  The Second Consultation Paper on the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive confirmed that the UK Government and the Welsh Assembly Government would designate the Environment Agency as sole competent authority for the Directive.

  2.8  The Environment Agency is a single corporate body covering England and Wales with offices in both England and in Wales. Defra sponsors the Agency in respect of its activities in England and is its lead sponsor. The Welsh Assembly Government sponsors the Agency in respect of its activities in Wales.

  2.9  Whilst in Wales the Agency uses the working title of Environment Agency Wales, this is not a separate body. Therefore as a single England and Wales corporate body the Agency is well placed to manage England-Wales cross-border river basin districts.

Transposition

  2.10  The arrangements for transposition have yet to be finalised and agreed by Defra and Assembly Government Ministers. It is, though, intended that the National Assembly for Wales ("the Assembly") will transpose the Directive in Wales by means of secondary legislation and be given any additional powers that are necessary to enable it to do so. Those powers will be diverse, in the same way that the Directive is itself diverse, and it is expected that they will reflect the current devolution settlement. As the Committee will be aware, that settlement largely devolves powers relating to water quality in Wales to the National Assembly.

  2.11  In the case of cross-border waters and the implementation of the Community measures, provisions are already in place to ensure that the efforts of Defra and the Assembly are coordinated, whilst ensuring that Community measures are properly given effect. For example, certain regulation making powers of the Secretary of State in relation to cross-border water bodies (the Severn or Dee) which are physically in Wales may only be exercised if the Assembly agrees.

  Other powers, for example, to give directions to the Environment Agency, may be exercised by the Secretary of State or the Assembly, but the Assembly is required to obtain the agreement of the Secretary of State where any such directions would have any effect in England or, in relation to water management or water pollution aspects, in those parts of Wales which are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn. It would be expected that broadly similar arrangements will be provided for in the transposing regulations, although the precise balance will depend on the particular power in question and its relationship to the established devolution settlement. This means that joint action will continue to be provided for in respect of the quality of cross-border water bodies and that the allocation of those powers, and responsibility for their exercise, will be clear.

  2.12  The Secretary of State also holds reserve powers to ensure that Community obligations are met, and she will continue to do so (although these powers have never been exercised).

Plan preparation and approval

  2.13  New arrangements will be made, also reflecting the devolution settlement, in respect of river basin management plans. The second consultation paper proposes that the Environment Agency will draw up draft river basin management plans, and that it will encourage the active involvement of interested parties in, and consult on, draft plans (page 25).

  2.14  The Secretary of State in respect of England and the Assembly in respect of Wales will have an explicit role in approving plans, including powers to require modifications, or to reject them. In order to ensure a consistent approach, provision will be made to enable the Secretary of State in England and the Assembly in Wales to issue guidance to the Agency on the content and form of plans, and to determine the procedure for their production. In order for the Secretary of State and the Assembly to be sure that the influence of other bodies with relevant functions are fully reflected in the measures and plans, the regulations (and guidance under them) will set out which bodies will need to be involved and which functions need to be taken into account. In relation to cross-border river basin districts, these powers might be exercised jointly.

England-Scotland

Competent authorities

  2.15  This will be the Environment Agency as regards England. In respect of Scotland the Water Environment and Water Services (Scotland) Bill, currently before the Scottish Parliament, appoints the Scottish Environment Protection Agency as the lead agency in Scotland.

Transposition

  2.16  Defra and the Scottish Executive are considering options for the legal process for designating the Tweed and Solway cross-border district(s) and ensuring that the river basin management plan(s) is produced together with programmes of measures. Options include the Secretary of State making the necessary provisions in regulations under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972, making reference to section 57 of the Scotland Act 1998. Alternatively, an Order might be made under section 104 of the Scotland Act 1998. Schedule 7 of the Scotland Act 1998 sets out the procedures to be used.

  2.17  In light of the fact that the Scottish Bill is still under consideration, it is premature to consider what detailed arrangements will be made. That said, the Scottish Bill does not provide for the establishment of cross-border river basins: basins cannot be "split up", and the Scottish Parliament has no powers outside Scotland. The Secretary of State will have a role in those areas, then, but such provision will require careful consideration with the Scottish Executive, once their Bill is enacted.

  2.18  The Government and the Scottish Executive will consider further what is the best option and proposals on this issue will be included in the third and final consultation paper.

Plan preparation and approval

  2.19  Although two competent authorities are involved as opposed to one in England-Wales, the process of plan preparation and approval is very similar as regards cross-border river basins with Scotland. There will need to be a river basin plan or plans which include the two cross-border basins, SEPA and the Environment Agency will be responsible for drawing them up as regards Scotland and England and the Scottish Executive and UK Government will be responsible for their approval and related issues as regards Scotland and England.

Northern Ireland

  2.20  The Directive has specific provisions (articles 3(3) and 13(1) and (2)) for dealing with river basins that cover the territory of more than one member state. These basins must be assigned to international river basin districts.

  2.21  Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in relation to international river basin districts on the island of Ireland is being actively progressed by the North/South Working Group on Water Quality (N/S WGWQ) and its North/South Technical Advisory Group. The N/S WGWQ recently drafted a joint North/South consultation paper—Managing Our Shared Waters—which is to be launched soon by the Department of the Environment in the North and the Department of the Environment and Local Government in the South. This joint paper proposes the delineation of three international river basin districts and five river basin districts (one in the North and four in the South) on the island of Ireland. It also makes recommendations for the administrative arrangements necessary to co-ordinate river basin management planning within the designated international river basin districts.

3.  DEFRA'S ADMINISTRATION COSTS FOR THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE

  3.1  There is a range of people working on implementation of the Water Framework Directive across Defra, across Government and across the statutory bodies—particularly the Environment Agency in its proposed role as competent authority, but also bodies such as English Nature and British Waterways.

  3.2  It is difficult to quantify precisely what proportions of what number of posts contribute to Defra's administrative costs in implementing the Directive.

  3.3  Within Defra one branch of six people within Water Quality Division directly works on the Directive—a Grade 7, three HEOs, one EO and a part-time AO. Other work is covered in this branch (for example on the Fresh Water Fish Directive) but the bulk of its activity is on the Water Framework Directive and the Water Framework Directive Community Implementation Strategy. These direct costs are currently some £160,000 a year, but do not include accommodation or travel costs. Other direct staff costs falling to Defra (see below) are of the same order.

  3.4  The Director of Defra's Water Directorate is also involved with work to implement the Directive as UK water director at twice yearly meetings of water directors of member states and candidate accession countries which has provided a focal point for preparation of non-legally binding guidance documents. In addition, the water director has regular meetings with the Environment Agency to ensure effective Defra/Agency joint working. The Divisional Head also has a significant involvement, including being a member of the Environment Agency's project board for implementation of the Directive. Other members of the Water Quality Division also are involved—such as the policy advice provided on the proposed enabling power to prevent or control diffuse pollution (one G7 and an HEO) and advice provided in relation to the existing groundwater protection and priority (hazardous) substances aspects of the Directive (one G7 and two HEOs) and discharge consenting policy (one G7 and an HEO).

  3.5  Other parts of the Water Directorate provide policy advice, in particular Water Supply and Regulation Division which provides advice on abstraction, water metering, efficient use of water, water pricing and drinking water quality (at G7 level). Staff in Marine and Waterways Division advise on issues relating to coastal water and marine monitoring (one SEO).

  3.6  Outside of the Water Directorate significant support is given by Legal (one G7) and by an economist (one G7 and assistant). The European Wildlife Division (one G7) is closely involved with those aspects of the Directive concerned with biodiversity/wetlands. Colleagues in other parts of Defra also input where appropriate, for example, through the cross-cutting review on diffuse water pollution from agriculture and on flood protection.

  3.7  Advice across Government is channelled through the Inter-Departmental Steering Group, which brings together the policy leads on issues which affect other Government Departments, for example, ODPM in relation to planning, Department for Transport in relation to diffuse urban pollution from transport and DTI in relation to impacts on key industrial sectors.

Defra

January 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 11 February 2003