Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 20

Joint memorandum submitted by CAFOD, ActionAid, Oxfam and Christian Aid (H23)

  The CAP is enormously expensive and enormously damaging. A typical family of four currently pays £16 a week in taxes and higher food prices to prop up a regime with a disastrous track record of overproduction, environmental degradation, and food safety scares. If the CAP only affected Europeans, international aid agencies like ourselves would leave the debate to others, but the CAP also undermines the livelihoods of millions of farmers in developing countries by dumping cheap produce in their markets and denying them export opportunities to the largest single market in the world.

  We are therefore deeply disappointed and concerned that the CAP's external impact gets almost no attention in the Mid-Term Review. Moreover, given the widespread anger among developing countries at the WTO over the issue of northern subsidies and double standards, and the impending Cotonou negotiations between the EU and ACP countries to set up Economic Partnership Agreements, we do not think it is politically wise or even possible to ignore the CAP's external impact to such an extent.

  We have made a number of observations and recommendations how to deal with the CAP's development implications in the attached submission [not printed] which we have sent to the parallel House of Lords inquiry. Given the gravity of the issue, we would also like to draw it to the attention of the EFRA inquiry,

30 September 2002



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 21 January 2003