Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Ramblers' Association (R1)

BACKGROUND

The legislation

  Part I of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (CROW) introduces a new statutory right of access for open-air recreation to mountain, moor, heath, down and registered common land, once maps of these areas have been drawn up by the Countryside Agency (CA) and Countryside Council for Wales (CCW). The right could also be extended to coastal land in the future.

  Certain land is specifically excluded, including buildings, gardens, cultivated land, land consisting of improved or semi-improved grassland, golf courses, racecourses and railways.

  Certain activities and behaviour will not be permitted such as horse-riding, and using vehicles, including bicycles and boats. People on access land must not light fires, damage plants, animals or property, feed livestock or bathe in water. Those who break these rules will lose their right of access for 72 hours and will be treated as trespassers.

  Landowners may exclude or restrict access for any reason for up to 28 days a year without seeking permission, although closures at weekends are to be limited. They will also be able to seek further exclusions or restrictions for land management reasons. The CA and CCW will be able to authorise closures on grounds of nature and heritage conservation, fire prevention and to avoid danger to the public. A new country code will be produced which will inform landowners of their responsibilities and will also ensure that the public are properly informed about their new rights and how to enjoy them responsibly.

The mapping process

  Under CROW, the land which will become available to walkers must be clearly identified before the new rights can be exercised. In England, the CA must produce maps showing all open country and registered common land. They have appointed a contractor—Binnie, Black and Veatch (BBV)—to do this.

  The CA must include all land which they consider to be wholly or predominantly mountain, moor, heath or down on the maps. They may move the boundary to make it more obvious to landowners and users on the ground and may exclude areas under five hectares if they consider that they serve no useful purpose.

  They must also include all registered common land on the map, that is, land registered under the Commons Registration Act 1965.

  Until the maps have been produced and the Secretary of State has issued a commencement order, there will be no new access.

  There are five stages to the process:

    —  Draft maps. Once these are produced there will be a three-month period during which anyone can put forward their views. This is the most important stage for walkers and other users to have their say.

    —  Provisional maps. Once these are produced there will be a right of appeal for landowners only if they consider that an area of land shown is not mountain, moor heath, down or common land and should not be shown.

    —  Conclusive maps. This is the map which will define where the new right of access exists.

    —  Commencement. The Secretary of State will decide when the new right of access will begin.

    —  Review. The maps will be reviewed within 10 years and no less than every 10 years after that.

Mapping in England

  Mapping is proceeding on a region-by-region basis. The timetable has been revised several times, but the current one is as follows:
RegionDraft map Provisional map
1. South EastPublished Nov 2001 Published Oct 2002
2. Lower North WestPublished Nov 2001 Published Nov 2002
3. SouthPublished Sept 2002
4. Upper North WestPublished 10 Dec 2002
5. North EastDue March 2003
6. South WestDue Spring 2003
7. WestDue Summer 2003
8. EastDue Autumn 2003


  Remaining provisional maps are expected to be published six to eight months after the end of the consultation on draft maps, depending on the number of submissions received. Conclusive maps are expected to be published six to 12 months after the provisional maps depending on appeals. The final target for the completion of all mapping and the introduction of access rights is 2005 (this is the government's Public Service Agreement target).

PROGRESS SO FAR

The first two regions

  Draft maps for the first two regions were published in November 2001 and, at that point, a three-month public consultation began, ending in February 2002. The second stage of the process, the provisional maps, were to have been published in June 2002.

  However, on 17 April 2002 the CA announced that the publication dates for these first two maps were to be delayed from June until July 2002 (South East) and from June until September 2002 (Lower North West). In the same press release, the Agency announced that almost all other publication dates for draft and provisional maps were also to be put back by approximately two months.

  The provisional map for the South East was finally published on 29 July 2002, and the three-month period during which those with a legal interest in the land can appeal against its inclusion began. (The Planning Inspectorate will hear appeals.)

  However, on 22 August 2002, in another press release, the CA announced that, due to errors having been found on the first provisional map it would have to be withdrawn. These errors were principally the cause of decisions having been taken on submissions made during the draft map consultation but then not reflected on the provisional map.

  In this announcement, the CA again announced delays to the mapping programme. The provisional map for the Lower North West would not be published on 30 September 2002. In addition, the CA chose to move from a timetable that gave the exact dates on which draft and provisional maps would be published to one that merely gives the season during which the draft map will be published, with a promise that the provisional maps will follow six to eight months afterwards.

  The reissued provisional map for the South East was published on 7 October 2002, and the three-month period during which appeals can be submitted began again. The provisional map for the Lower North West was published on 18 November 2002.

Mapping from existing datasets

  BBV is producing draft maps using existing datasets (for example, habitat surveys and MAFF information such as the moorland line). This information is supplemented in some areas by aerial photography and site visits. In many areas the data available appears to have been out of date and inadequate for this purpose, leading to delays in production of maps and inaccuracies in published draft maps. The inadequate quality of the available data was nowhere more obvious than in the Macclesfield area. The resulting poor quality of the mapping in this part of Cheshire (and in other parts of Region 2) was an undoubted factor in the unexpectedly large number of comments received during the draft map consultation for the region, and therefore for the delay in the mapping programme. The inaccuracy of the data used meant that the draft map showed as access land areas that are specifically precluded under the legislation—fields with crops, gardens etc. which gave opponents of the legislation a stick with which to beat the CA as well as leading to a huge number of comments in response to the consultation.

  In the announcement on 17 April 2002 the CA admitted that they did not have good enough data for parts of Region 3, and in particular for Wiltshire, to be able to issue the draft map for Region 3 on time. More aerial photography needed to be bought in, and more fieldwork had to be done, to ensure that the maps reflected what the CA should have been mapping. (Despite the delays, anecdotal evidence from Ramblers' Association members on the ground in Wiltshire suggests that they may not have been altogether successful.)

Emergency regulations

  One of the consequences of the withdrawal of the provisional map for Region 1 on 22 August last year was that DEFRA were forced to do an emergency consultation on regulations to allow for the correcting of errors in provisional and conclusive maps should they occur in future. This meant diverting effort in the department from other important sets of regulations required under Part I of CROW, and has put the regulatory timetable back further.

The methodology

  Another result of the announcement of 17 April 2002 was a retrospective change in the mapping methodology in reference to the discretion allowed to the CA to omit land that qualifies as open country but is less than five hectares and therefore serves no useful purpose. Originally, land less than five hectares could only be omitted if it met all of the following criteria:

    —  There was other access land nearby.

    —  The land did not provide a route to other access land.

    —  There was no nearby parcel of land which had the potential to be linked with the parcel to form a larger unit.

    —  The land did not contain any feature of special interest to the public.

    —  The land was not close to any settlement, visitor attraction, right of way or public road.

  Under the amended methodology the Agency were only required to bear these criteria in mind when making a decision. In addition, the methodology was applied retrospectively to Regions 1 and 2, thereby removing land without its removal being subject to public consultation as to it serving a useful purpose.

Binnie Black and Veatch/Atkins

  There has been a renegotiation of the contract between the Agency and BBV (and a transfer of risk from the Agency to BBV). Problems appear to have occurred because BBV had not been able to adequately increase the size of their operation as the scale of the mapping project became apparent. This was one of the factors contributing to the mapping delays. The CA has retained the services of consultants Atkins to do a project audit of BBV's work on mapping thus far.

Regional commencement of the new rights of access

  In a written ministerial statement on 28 November 2002, Alun Michael announced that the new access rights under Part I of CROW would be introduced in Regions 1 and 3 (the South East and Central Southern regions) in the summer of 2004. However, no announcement of their implementation in Region 2 (the Lower North West) was forthcoming. In a written answer to a question from Paddy Tipping MP on 9 December the minister clarified the original statement and said that he intends to open the new statutory right of access in the lower north-west and upper north-west together during the autumn of 2004, to be followed by the north-east and the south-west in the first six months of 2005, with all access land opened by the end of 2005.

Restrictions system

  Before any new rights of access can be implemented the CA must establish and test a restrictions system. They expect this restrictions system to be in place by December 2003, giving just a few months before the new rights commence in the first two regions. The Agency has admitted that the timescales for development and testing of the restrictions system before delivery are tight.

Conclusion

  Given the enormous public benefit which will be the result of the successful implementation of this important legislation and the considerable problems that appear to have been encountered, the Ramblers' Association believes that there is much to be gained from a parliamentary audit of the CA's work on this project so far.

29 January 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 March 2003