Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60-79)

MR KEVIN HAWKINS AND MR ALAN BLACKLEDGE-SMITH

10 JUNE 2003

  Q60  Chairman: Mr Hawkins, were you in at the start of the CIWF evidence?

  Mr Hawkins: No; I heard the last quarter of an hour.

  Q61  Chairman: Just to reiterate, for completeness, the scope of the inquiry which is of course, as you have read, to examine the state of poultry farming looking particularly at the impact of new regulations on the industry in its competitiveness and on animal welfare standards. Mr Hawkins, you work for . . .?

  Mr Hawkins: Safeway.

  Q62  Chairman: In what capacity?

  Mr Hawkins: I am Communications Director for Safeway; I am also a Director of the British Retail Consortium and, as it is tangentially relevant to this afternoon's proceedings, I am a Member of the Meat and Livestock Commission, so I am guilty on all counts!

  Q63  Chairman: We are setting the scene for the moment. Mr Alan Blackledge-Smith, you are here in which capacity?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: I am the Technical Controller at Safeway for meat, fish and poultry.

  Q64  Chairman: Are you involved with the BRC as well or not?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: No.

  Q65  Chairman: We are moving as smoothly as I can engineer from the point that has been made by Mr Stevenson that consumers have to take on trust to a great extent the animal welfare background to the chickens and eggs which they are buying from the large retailers who do control of the great majority of the market and the BRC represents them and you have said, addressing this to Mr Hawkins, that retailers will only source poultry products that meet their own specifications. Is there much variation in expectation and specification from the retailers within the BRC membership?

  Mr Hawkins: Generally speaking, probably not. I think that you have the big six retailers: ourselves, Tesco, Sainsbury, Asda, Morrisons and Somerfield—I guess that they are all pretty much of a muchness. Then of course you have the smaller more specialist retailers like the M&S food business and like Waitrose who may require slightly higher specifications for some of their grades because they charge a slightly higher price; they are more of a premium-price operation.

  Q66  Chairman: And you do compare notes? As the BRC, do you collect information from within your membership as to the variability of the standards of expectation?

  Mr Hawkins: As these are competitive issues or shared inter-competitive issues, I do not think the BRC itself collects commercial criteria but what it does do of course is to have a BRC technical standard which all of us insist our suppliers adhere to and that covers things like hygiene, basic welfare and so on. Above and beyond that, we have things like the ACP scheme, which I am sure you have heard about already, and of course our individual retailer codes of practice which go beyond the ACP scheme in some respects. Certainly I am now speaking for the Safeway code.

  Q67  Chairman: Does the same standard apply to poultry which is sold fresh as opposed to poultry meat being used as an ingredient for prepared products?

  Mr Hawkins: In the case of poultry meat sold as part of a higher value-added product like a ready-meal or a convenience food of course, those are supplied either by the manufacturers under their own brand, in which case they specify whatever they want. If it is our own brand, then of course we have more control over it. Generally speaking, I would say that the requirements are broadly comparable. Would you agree with that, Alan?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: Yes.

  Q68  Chairman: You make a big thing in pitching for the trust of consumers—and I am now talking as a retail industry—about independent auditing of standards and presumably your inspectors do not let the suppliers know weeks in advance before they turn up at their barns or their intensive production units, but how frequently—and I will turn the question specifically to Safeway in a moment—do you inspect farms and processors in the UK?

  Mr Hawkins: There are independent teams or agencies who do inspections. ACP, for example, have their own team of inspectors and there are independent auditors and of course independence is important because it establishes our credibility.

  Q69  Chairman: How frequently do they go to look at the standards in place?

  Mr Hawkins: Our code of practice aims for once a year, that is once a year to be audited directly by Safeway technical staff and that is on top of whatever independent auditors may also do. Clearly, it is more difficult when you are talking about a site in Thailand or Brazil but, even there, we would expect to visit them unannounced at least once every two years.

  Q70  Chairman: How rigorous is the action taken by your member and let us say to you, Mr Blackledge-Smith, if you or your independent auditors or their agents do find breaches in relation to minimum standards expected?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: It obviously depends on what the breach might be but the ultimate criteria would be delist the source of supply.

  Q71  Chairman: Have Safeway done that in recent times?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: In November, we de-listed a source of supply which has not been reinstated.

  Q72  Chairman: Was that a small-scale supplier or a medium one?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: It was quite a large-scale supplier.

  Q73  Chairman: Had that organisation been given a warning in the past or was it an immediate cessation?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: It was a first-time visit in fact as part of another group and it did not meet the standards that we required, so it was not taken on board.

  Q74  Chairman: How did you publicise to the wider community of suppliers and would-be suppliers that that is what you had done?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: We do not deal with that many suppliers; we have quite a small supply base in fact and it is just a known fact that that was the reason.

  Q75  Chairman: I was not expecting you to put on the noticeboard that XYZ Limited no longer supplied Safeway, but how did you actually let the world of suppliers know that you did take these things seriously?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: I think because of, shall we say, the smallness of the industry, it does not take an awful lot of broadcasting for that information to become known around the industry. It is quite a small grapevine, I would suggest.

  Q76  Chairman: So there is a broiler telegraph almost?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: I would say there is a very good broiler telegraph, yes.

  Q77  Diana Organ: You have said that Safeway only sources product that meets their own specification and that often your codes go beyond the ACP standards, but you have also said to us that the BRC is heavily involved in working with poultry producers and poultry product suppliers to develop and implement assurance schemes to establish production and processing standards for retailer own-brand products. That does not sit together because, if you are setting your own specification and they are different or go beyond the ACP or other quality or farm assurance schemes, why do you need farm assurance schemes anyway because you take more notice of your own specification?

  Mr Hawkins: Alan will comment on that but you must bear in mind that there is a broad spread of membership in the BRC, some larger retailers, some smaller retailers, and of course you also have a number of food service companies in membership as well. Therefore, while the big three or four retailers may all have their codes of practice and one or two of the smaller ones, not everybody does and therefore it is important that the BRC tries to establish a common standard throughout the retail sector and then of course that leaves people like ourselves free to improve on those standards as and when we can. It is not a matter of following a completely different code. For example, the ACP scheme does not formally prohibit the use of antibiotic growth promoters but the Safeway code does. The Safeway code is much stronger on the need for suppliers to produce documentation, so that if any of their practices are challenged by an auditor, they are able to show or not show as the case may be, by the provision of documentary evidence that they have adhered to that standard.

  Q78  Chairman: You have led from BRC to Safeway to cite some things which Safeway does which you are suggesting is higher than the—

  Mr Hawkins: In certain respects.

  Q79  Diana Organ: I was interested in your codes—and let us take you with your Safeway's hat on now—and I ask you whether you would have a different set of specification for British product to that for, say, Brazilian and Thailand product?

  Mr Hawkins: Not in terms of quality, no. Do you want to comment on that, Alan?

  Mr Blackledge-Smith: I have recently filled in a questionnaire which asked the very same question as to what the wording was in our documents that matched UK and foreign production. We only have one standard and one audit process regardless of whether it is the UK, Thailand or Brazil.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 23 July 2003