Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by Mr Kevin Hawkins, Director, British Retail Consortium (X21[b])

  If the session had not been prematurely concluded, I would have said something along the following lines:

  An outright prohibition on caged production in the UK will dramatically reduce the output of eggs and result in a corresponding increase in their price. Prices will rise because production costs will increase. Free range production is clearly far better for the animals but productivity levels are far lower due to the loss of scale economies. As a result, cheap imports will flood in to fill the gap. The UK eggs industry will shrink in much the same way that our pig industry has done over the past five years but probably to a much greater extent. British eggs will become an up-market, niche product.

  The effects of adopting enriched cages will depend on how much time the industry is given to make the necessary investment, as I started to explain in my answer to Q112. Enriched cages will reduce productivity levels and both this loss of technical efficiency and the investment involved will increase the industry's costs. As its operating margins are typically small this will increase the supply cost to retailers, who will either try to absorb the increase or pass it on to consumers or achieve some combination of both. This will in turn increase the level of imports, although not to the extent that will occur if caged production is prohibited. The combined pressures of a rising cost base and growing import penetration will force UK egg producers to achieve greater scale economies, which means greater concentration through mergers and acquisitions. There will, of course, be a gain in animal welfare but most consumers buy a commodity product like eggs primarily on price and value. Once again there are very close parallels with the pig industry. The more notice the industry has, however, and the longer the transitional phase, the less disruptive the introduction of enriched cages will be.

  The conclusion, therefore, is—as I said in Q112—that the sooner DEFRA makes a decision one way or the other, the better.

3 July 2003




 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 23 July 2003