Select Committee on European Scrutiny First Report


  21. ENLARGEMENT AND STATE AID FOR THE STEEL INDUSTRY

(a)

(23920)

13525/02

SEC(02) 1121

(b)

(23950)

13814/02

COM(02) 593


Commission staff working paper: Final assessment of the Programme for Restructuring of the Czech Steel Industry.


Draft Council Decision on the fulfilment of the conditions laid down in Article 3 of the Additional Protocol to the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States and the Czech Republic with regard to an extension of the period foreseen in Article 8(4) of Protocol 2 of the Europe Agreement.

Legal base:(a) —
(b) Not yet established
Document originated:(a) 16 October2002

(b) 31 October 2002

Deposited in Parliament:(a) 30 October 2002

(b) 8 November 2002

Department:Trade and Industry
Basis of consideration:EM of 13 November 2002
Previous Committee Report:None; but see (23506) 8969/02 and (23645) —: HC 152-xxxvii (2001-02), paragraph 13 (17 July 2002)
To be discussed in Council:26 November 2002
Committee's assessment:Politically important
Committee's decision:Cleared


The background

21.1

The Europe Agreements, establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States on the one hand, and, respectively, Poland, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Bulgaria, and the Republic of Romania on the other, allow state aid, to facilitate restructuring, to these countries' steel industries for five years from the date of the association (the grace period), and also allow extensions of those grace periods.

21.2

In July we cleared draft Decisions to allow extensions of the grace periods, by eight years or until accession, whichever is sooner, for the countries concerned. The extensions were to be subject to completion of the Commission's analysis of restructuring plans and the Council's agreement that they meet the criteria of the original agreements.

The documents

21.3

The Czech Government has now submitted its restructuring plan and document (a) is the Commission's assessment of it. The assessment is that the requirements of the Europe Agreement are met and that an extension of the grace period is justified. Document (b) is the draft Council Decision to allow that extension.

The Government's view

21.4

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Competition, Consumers and Markets, Department of Trade and Industry (Miss Melanie Johnson) tells us:

"Our main objectives concerning the steel sector in Central Europe have been:

—  Bring about transparency on all aid granted

—  For aid to cease on accession

—  To establish an industry in the area that was viable without national aid and artificial support.

"The State Aid authorities in the Czech Republic have been the subject of assistance from UK experts (via an EU 'twinning project' designed to help candidates prepare for EU membership) and have acted to ensure no aid is being paid before approval of the extension of the grace period in the Europe Agreement. The process is therefore working and together with the accession negotiations has enabled us to achieve all the above objectives as regards the Czech Republic.

"The restructuring plan sets out limited levels of aid to be paid to four companies in the run up to accession, whereupon all aid will cease. It also identifies aid paid since the expiry of the original grace period under the Europe Agreement. In return for agreement to the aid the plan proposes cuts in overall capacity of the order of 590,000 tonnes per year. This is in line with previous EU policy and will require the physical destruction of the production equipment, thereby guaranteeing a global reduction in capacity.

"The Commission believe the plan gives appropriate attention to strategy and the prevailing business environment. The assumptions about the market for steel are considered realistic and the targets for sales, productivity and so on are achievable. By the end of 2006 all the companies affected should meet the Commission's stringent viability criteria, but if they do not there is to be no further support available.

"The Czech authorities are required to report on progress and aid paid every six months. In turn, the Commission will be closely monitoring progress against the plan and will be expected to report regularly to the Council.

"The UK steel industry has been consulted informally and are aware of the Commission's positive assessment of the Czech restructuring plan. The industry agrees that the capacity cuts specified are commensurate to the amount of aid to be paid. They are, however, concerned that the plan's implementation be properly monitored by the Commission and Council."

Conclusion

21.5

When we cleared the earlier documents we recognised the UK steel industry's interest in securing transparency on aid to the sector and in establishing a level playing field in the enlarged EU as soon as possible. So we note the industry's view that the capacity cuts planned are commensurate with the aid proposed. But we note also the industry's wish that implementation of the plan be properly monitored. We are content to clear the documents, but look to the Government to remind the Council and the Commission as necessary of the need for proper monitoring.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 8 January 2003