22. NETWORK AND INFORMATION
SECURITY
(23969)
| Draft Council Resolution on a European approach towards a culture of network and information security
|
Legal base: |
|
| |
Department: | Trade and Industry
|
Basis of consideration: | EM of 18 November 2002
|
Previous Committee Report: | None
|
To be discussed in Council: | 5/6 December Transport/Telecommunication/Energy Council
|
Committee's assessment: | Politically important
|
Committee's decision: | Cleared
|
22.1
This Resolution follows a Commission Communication proposing a
European policy on network and information security[61]
and two Resolutions. One, dated 30 May 2001, noted the Communication,
recognised the importance of the issue, and referred back to the
emphasis given to it in the eEurope Action Plan.[62]
The other, dated 28 January 2002, included an action plan and
agreement on a limited number of key issues, together with target
dates.[63]
22.2
The present Resolution recalls the earlier documents, acknowledges
the importance and wide scope of information security, and points
to the OECD Guidelines as a valuable model for developing policies
which achieve a culture of security while respecting democratic
values and the importance of personal data protection. Its goals
are:
to define and attribute responsibility for the security
of networks and information systems for all stakeholders (specifically
consumers, businesses, service providers and governments);
to improve responses to security incidents;
to encourage the integration of the management of
security risks into mainstream management thinking and "business
engineering"; and
to take a "holistic" view of the risks associated
with information systems and include human failings and physical
events in threat assessments.
The Government's view
22.3
The Minister for E-Commerce and Competitiveness, Department of
Trade and Industry (Mr Stephen Timms) says that the Resolution
encourages continued effort by the Member States to create the
right policy framework to improve the security of networks and
information systems. He says that it does this by taking a more
strategic view of the policy objectives. It is less orientated
towards actions than the previous Resolution, which was seen to
some extent as an immediate response to the events of 11 September
2001.
22.4
The Minister notes that the UK has already taken action on many
of the issues addressed in the Resolution, in particular by promoting
the use of the OECD guidelines.
Conclusion
22.5
We see the main purpose of this Resolution as securing agreement
on a common policy of pursuing the guidelines published recently
by the OECD[64],
as well as giving fresh momentum to pursuit of the goals it sets
out. We understand that some Member States have taken the view
that a tight regulatory approach would be appropriate, whereas
the UK Government regards the OECD approach as providing a more
flexible framework with greater freedom to react to the development
over time of new technologies and processes. Differences of approach
between the Member States in the Council have slowed progress.
22.6
When we considered the 28 January 2002 Resolution, we urged
the Government to press for broader solutions which recognised
that the issues were of global concern, and we supported the Commission's
suggestion that there should be increased dialogue with international
organisations and partners.
22.7
We therefore welcome the Government's approach and the decision
of the Danish Presidency to put this Resolution to the 5/6 December
Council.
1.8
We now clear the document.
61 (22472)
9727/01; see HC 152-ii (2001-02), paragraph 34 (17 October 2001). Back
62 (22580)
-; see HC 152-ii (2001-02), paragraph 34 (17 October 2001). Back
63 (23093)
-; see HC 152-xiv (2001-02), paragraph 15 (23 January 2002). Back
64 Information
Security Management Systems - Specification with Guidance for
Use (BS7799-2:2002). Back
|