Select Committee on European Scrutiny Fourth Report


14. MEASURING INSTRUMENTS


(23209)

6121/02

COM(02) 37


Amended Draft Directive on measuring instruments.

Legal base:Article 95 EC; co-decision; qualified majority voting
Department:Trade and Industry
Basis of consideration:SEM of 27 November 2002
Previous Committee Report:HC 152-xxxii (2001-02), paragraph 4 (12 June 2002)
To be discussed in Council:Not known
Committee's assessment:Legally and politically important
Committee's decision:Cleared



Background

  14.1  Measuring instruments include petrol pumps, beer glasses, meters for water, gas and electricity and, in the field of public protection, evidential breath analysers and exhaust gas analysers. At present, such instruments are regulated on a national basis. In September 2000, the Commission proposed a draft Directive to harmonise regulation of measuring instruments, covering a huge market which the Commission estimated at about 10% of Community GDP, with the utilities sector (electricity, gas, water and heat meters) accounting for about half of that.

  14.2  The present document is an amended proposal from the Commission , to be known as the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). As under the initial proposal, the amended text specifies a list of measuring instrument categories currently widely regulated in Member States. The effect of the proposal would be that, if a Member State wished to continue to regulate any of the instruments on the list, the instruments would have to comply fully with the technical provisions of the MID. Member States would have the option not to regulate categories or types of instruments on the list.

  14.3  The proposal would have effect only up to the stage of placing the product on the market and putting it into use. It does not include any obligation on Member States to ensure that regulated instruments continue to remain in compliance with the MID when in service. Continuing compliance may be a key requirement, for example, for consumer protection or public safety, but that would remain a matter for national legislation in each Member State.

  14.4  The proposal includes arrangements for a Measuring Instruments Committee (MIC) to be able, amongst other things, to modify the specified requirements for measuring instruments as set out in annexes to the Directive.

  14.5  When we considered the document last June[50] we decided not to clear it but to await clarification of a number of concerns, including the implications of the proposal for evidential breath analysers and exhaust gas analysers, the status of the MIC, and public procurement.

The Supplementary Explanatory Memorandum of 27 November 2002

  14.6  The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Science and Innovation, Department of Trade and Industry (Lord Sainsbury) tells us that matters have moved on in working group discussions under the Spanish and Danish Presidencies. On the MIC he says that the revised Commission proposal provides greater accountability: the committee is now to be governed by regulatory comitology procedures (whereby the Commission will be bound by qualified majority decisions of Member States) on the issues of technical change, whilst leaving the approval of documents dealing with international standards under advisory comitology procedures (whereby the Commission is advised by Member States). The Minister says the Government welcomes this revision.

  14.7  On evidential breath analysers (as used in drink-driving cases) the Minister tells us that, because of complexities arising from differences in Member States in both technical matters and legal issues, a Presidency proposal that these instruments be omitted from the scope of the Directive has been agreed. He says the Government supports deletion of the relevant annex, as at this stage considerable further effort would be needed to achieve a workable procedure, and further delay would not be acceptable in relation to all the other instruments.

  14.8  As for exhaust gas analysers (EGAs) (as used in the MOT test), the Minister says that agreed amendments mean Member States will not now be stopped from regulating certain other peripheral equipment outside the basic EGA, and so proper management of associated data can be specified. He says this meets the Government's requirements.

  14.9  On public procurement the Minister tells us that there is agreement to delete the relevant provision. This means that utilities buying meters will be governed as regards their procurement activities only by the public procurement Directive (either the current version or its prospective replacement). He says this is preferable to having two Directives covering the same ground.

  14.10  The Minister summarises the significant amendments to the draft as:

  • deletion of Annex II, which covers non-mandatory test programmes, such as electrical or humidity testing, and which will now be dealt with separately by a harmonised standard;

  • inclusion of a specific obligation to audit Notified Bodies (which would be responsible for verification of new instruments);

  • consultation with interested parties prior to formal procedures of the MIC;

  • modified annexes defining standards for different instruments;

  • new provisions to clarify applicability to sub-assemblies; to invite Member States to consult about related International Organisation of Legal Metrology work; and to invite the Commission to report on progress after five years;

  • permission for Member States to make appropriate in-service requirements; and

  • to meet the request of industry, preservation of one of the present Directives (75/33/EEC) in respect of cold-water meters not covered by the proposal.

  14.11  The Minister tells us:

"In general good progress has been made, and from the UK's point of view the key issues have been resolved. A small number of technical issues remain outstanding."

  14.12  He also says:

"With the current progress it should be possible for a Common Position to be reached and the agreement of the EP secured during the first half of 2003, provided that the Greek Presidency affords the Directive sufficient priority. The latest draft provides 24 months for transposition into national legislation with coming into force following six months later. On this basis coming into force would take place in the second half of 2005."

Conclusion

  14.13  As the previous Committee reported, this is a potentially important measure in terms of establishing the basis for a Single Market in a significant area where the public is totally reliant on effective regulation. We have noted the amendments proposed in the revised draft and are grateful to the Minister for the clarifications he has given us. We are now content to clear the document.


50   See headnote. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 6 January 2003