Select Committee on European Scrutiny Thirty-First Report


8 Reduced levy on New Zealand dairy imports

(19221)

9384/98

Special Report No. 4/98 by the Court of Auditors on Importation of reduced rates of levy into the Community and disposal of New Zealand milk products.

Legal base
DepartmentHM Customs & Excise
Basis of consideration Minister's letter of 18 July 2003
Previous Committee ReportHC 155-xxxiv (1997-98), paragraph 4 (15 July 1998), HC 34-xv (1998-99), paragraph 1 (30 March 1999) and HC 23-xxii (1999-2000), paragraph 1 (21 June 2000)
To be discussed in CouncilNot applicable
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

8.1 Ever since the UK joined the European Community in 1973, specified quantities of New Zealand butter have been entitled to enter the Community at greatly reduced rates of levy, provided the butter concerned is indeed of New Zealand origin, and meets certain other conditions. In addition to the licence required by all imports of dairy products, New Zealand butter requires a document providing evidence that it meets the eligibility conditions and is within the quota limit. New Zealand cheese also benefits, to a more limited extent, from a similar concessionary arrangement.

8.2 These arrangements were reported upon in April 1998 by the Court of Auditors, which found major weaknesses in the controls exercised by the UK authorities, and in the Commissions oversight. As a result, the Court said that its audit had identified under-payments of import levies amounting to some €410 million and undue payments of export refunds amounting to €57,000. Of these sums, only about €118 million was said to be recoverable (because debts can be pursued only when they have been established by a demand within three years of their arising). The implications of this — not least in terms of the potential implications for the Community budget and the UK Exchequer — were the subject of lengthy Reports by our predecessors on 15 September 1998, 30 March 1999 and 21 June 2000. In particular, they noted in the latter case that, due to the further legal action already in train, it was likely to be some time yet before the extent of any liability arising from the past irregularities could be established, and they therefore decided to withhold clearance until the position on this was clearer. They also noted that a further report by the Court of Auditors on the subject was likely to be published later that year.

Minister's letter of 18 July 2003

8.3 We have now received a letter of 18 July 2003 from the Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo). She says that the separate Report which the Court of Auditors had been expected to produce had not materialized, but that the issue had been mentioned in the Court's Annual Report for the 1999 financial year, in which it had generally commended the action taken by Customs and Excise to protect the Community's financial interest. She adds that the Court has also acknowledged that a strategy had been adopted to ensure that effective controls were in place and had been executed, since when there had been no significant problems with imports of New Zealand dairy products.

8.4 On the earlier difficulties identified by the Court, the Minister says that the sums at stake have now been resolved in principle, after protracted litigation (including hearings in the House of Lords and VAT and Duties Tribunals) on a number of technical issues, including technical disputes. In the latter case, the Commission has granted remissions of major parts of the debts, and, following recent scientific advice regarding the reliability of butterfat content (and subsequent legal advice), the final amount will be subject to further major reductions. She says that it is not yet possible to put a precise figure on the final sum, but that the early indications are that it will be a small fraction of the estimated £290 million[16] thought originally to be at stake. The Minister adds that the result — which she anticipates will be reached by the end of this year — is expected to be a full and final revision of the debts, with the importers admitting liability, the outstanding balance being paid in full, and all potential claims against Customs and Excise and the Community being abandoned. Similarly, there is not expected to be any actual loss to the Community budget.

Conclusion

8.5 We are grateful to the Minister for this further information, in the light which we are now clearing this document.


16   This figure was later revised to £323 million. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 24 September 2003