Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Fourth Report


The UN Commission on Human Rights

79. The UN Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) is the UN's main forum for the discussion of human rights. It has 53 members, elected by the wider UN membership, and meets annually in Geneva in March or April each year to, "examine, monitor and publicly report either on human rights situations in specific countries or territories or on major phenomena of human rights violations worldwide."[165] The Annual Report indicated in its chapter on 'Human Rights and multilateral actions' that the 2002 plenary session of the Commission was not a successful one. It described it as: "a highly­charged, confrontational session with voting... split between developed and developing countries."[166] It reported that many resolutions regarded by the United Kingdom and EU as important were defeated and that much use was made of procedural devices to inhibit the Commission's work. The new "money-saving directives from the UN in New York" had also apparently badly affected the Commission's ability to tackle its heavy workload. (This issue had been brought to the public's attention two years ago when the then High Commissioner, Mary Robinson, resigned over the issue of resources for the UNCHR, claiming that it was run on "a shoe string... a frayed shoe string."[167])

80. Both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch expressed similar concerns over the 2002 session of the UNCHR and the future of the Commission's work. Like the FCO, they highlighted the time constraints imposed on the session and the resourcing issues, but also drew our attention to the Commission's membership. Many countries currently serving on the Commission have poor human rights records—Algeria, Indonesia and Sudan, for example—and HRW intimated that they, "successfully fought to gain seats on the UN body as a way of fending off criticism".[168] HRW suggested, therefore, that members of the Commission should face "some kind of basic hurdle" before they could be elected: signing up to some of the basic human rights conventions, for example, or being willing to accept visits of the Commission's special rapporteurs.[169]

81. During the course of our inquiry, this issue of the calibre of members of the Commission was brought to the fore by the election of Libya as its Chair. The USA had unusually forced a vote on the issue - traditionally agreed by consent - but was outvoted by 33 to 3, with the United Kingdom and the EU abstaining. Kevin Moley, the US ambassador to the UNCHR, told reporters that he had been "deeply disappointed" at the outcome.[170] This incredible result seemed to confirm what HRW had told us about the current worrying situation at the Commission. Its standing must surely be severely diminished by these events.

82. We raised our concerns about the future of the UNCHR with the Minister, who was particularly determined that the FCO should do its utmost to ensure that Libya carried out its role as Chair effectively. On the question of resources for the Commission he told us that, "[b]efore we go committing ourselves to increases in budgets we need to ensure... that the money is being spent effectively"; a view with which we have sympathy in relation to the UN. He also expressed some understandable doubts about the possibility of instigating benchmarks for members of the Commission through the existing decision-making structure.[171] We are conscious, though, of what one witness described as "a situation of rather weary shoulder shrugging" in relation to the UNCHR's future, and wish to see concrete plans by the FCO to help revitalise the Commission's role.[172] We recognise that the United Kingdom is only one member of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights and that there is great deal to be done if the Commission is to achieve its true potential as an international champion of human rights. However, we recommend that in its response to this Report, the FCO sets out clearly how it intends to assess whether the UNCHR has sufficient resources to carry out its work and how some form of basic human rights 'hurdle' might be introduced, in the long term, for members of the Commission.

Setting an example

83. It is without the remit of our Committee to report to the House on the Government's domestic human rights policies. However, the Annual Report commented in some detail on the domestic response to the terrorist threat and it noted that EU member states, including the United Kingdom, needed to put their "own house in order" as well as tackling the human rights record of other nations.[173] It recognised, as we do, that the United Kingdom must set a clear example of respect for human rights in all fields, if it is to be respected when commenting on situations abroad. It is in this context that we noted, during our oral evidence session with the Minister, the recent suggestion that the Prime Minister would be willing to reconsider Britain's obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights with respect to those seeking asylum.[174] We are confident that our colleagues in the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR), who are responsible for the scrutiny of matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom, will take a close interest in any such developments.[175] We conclude that it is vital that the United Kingdom sets the highest standards of respect for human rights in all areas of public life, if its work in promoting such rights overseas is to reach its full potential.


165   For details, see UNCHR's website: www.unhchr.ch/html/menu2/2/chr.htm. Back

166   Annual Report 2003, p 69 Back

167   "Mary Robinson to campaign outside UN", The Guardian, 24 March 2001 Back

168   "UN: many countries escape censure", HRW press release, 19 April 2002 Back

169   Q 65 [Mr Crawshaw] Back

170   "Libya to head UN rights watchdog", The Daily Telegraph, 21 January 2003, p 16 Back

171   Q 164 Back

172   Q 70 [Mr Crawshaw] Back

173   Annual Report 2002, pp 10-14 and p 75 Back

174   "'We must deal with asylum', says PM", BBC News, 19 February 2003 Back

175   See the JCHR's website at: www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/joint_committee_on_human_rights.cfm. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 March 2003