Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 160-179)

MR TOM DAVIES AND MR MICHAEL PAYNE

TUESDAY 28 JANUARY 2003

Chairman

  160. Good morning, gentlemen, and welcome. This is the part of our inquiry into making removal more efficient and more humane, those are the principal purposes. Can we begin by you each stating where you come from and what your role in all this is.

  (Mr Payne) My name is Michael Payne and I head the division of Wackenhut responsible for government services and that encompasses three main contracts: one is the management operation of Tinsley House Removal Centre at Gatwick Airport; the second one is the in-country escorting contract which encompasses a small removal short-term holding facility at Manchester Airport; thirdly, the one contract we have with NASS is the assisting of the Government's dispersal programme by the removing of asylum seekers from London and the South-East to different parts of the country. There are other aspects in relation to police custodial and Customs & Excise and things like that but they are not part of this inquiry.
  (Mr Davies) I am Tom Davies; I am the Managing Director of Loss Prevention International and we provide the overseas escorting service for the Immigration Service which effectively is the escorting of all special needs returnees back to their countries of origin.

Miss Widdecombe

  161. Given that there is widespread agreement between pretty well all shapes of politics that one of the biggest problems is the number of removals and that it bears no relation at all to the number of refusals and given the increasing pressure for results, how far would you find it practical to deal with a large increase in the number of removals, what would be the problems and how far do you think you can go?
  (Mr Payne) The immediate problem is to recognise that we are a demand led organisation and the very fact that the resources that we apply have been agreed in contractual manner with the Immigration Service, we would need to know approximate numbers of likely targets and then we could adjust the removal resources, that is to say human resources and vehicular resources, of the movements we undertake and there would need to be some physical alterations to the premises at airports where detainees and deportees are currently held because they are just not big enough to take any more at the moment.

  162. Given those constraints, could you remove double the number you remove at the moment, treble, quadruple?
  (Mr Payne) We are a "can do" organisation and I am sure that, given the right resources and the vehicles and the premises, we could achieve that. Yes, I am sure.

  163. Given that the premises is the longer term, the Government have a removal target of 30,000; are the premises adequate for that?
  (Mr Payne) Not at the moment, no.

  164. So, even if you were able to reach that target, it would be physically impossible to deliver?

  (Mr Payne) I think I would like to qualify that remark by saying, as I said initially, that we are a "can do" organisation and just because the premises at the moment are not adequate, it does not mean to say that alternative premises nearby could not be found.

  165. How quickly could you do it?
  (Mr Payne) I cannot answer that at the moment because I have not conducted an investigation into that particular question.

  166. What I am trying to tease out of you beyond all the ifs and buts is that there is a widespread recognition that we need to increase removals but if the Government were to say to you that they wanted their removal target actually met or that they wanted to increase that target, how quickly would you be able to respond to that? I take it that you could not do it in five minutes, but roughly how quickly?
  (Mr Payne) I think you would need to ask the authority that question because I suspect that the matter would have to go out to public tender as opposed to just increasing our contract. If you are saying that you want to increase our contract to that sort of number, it would not be done in five minutes, I accept, because we have to go through a recruiting and training process. All our officers go through a four week induction course to start off with followed by a period of shadowing more senior members of staff to equate themselves with the tasks at hand.

  167. And at the moment you do not have the facilities even to reach the target?
  (Mr Payne) Not 30,000, no.

  168. Why is it necessary to move people between their homes and removal centres and then the airports early in the morning and late at night? Can you just talk us through the rationale.
  (Mr Payne) As I indicated a few moments ago, we are charged with the responsibility of moving those people signalled for deportation by the Immigration Service and we adapt to and follow their instructions. It is a matter of fact that flights to certain parts of the world take place in the early morning and late evening and if those are the times of the flights to destinations that the deportees are scheduled to take, then that is the time they have to be moved.

  169. Can you tell me what proportion are actually moved at those hours rather than during the ordinary day?
  (Mr Payne) No, I have not come with those figures.

  170. Would you be able to provide such figures?
  (Mr Payne) If you gave me a list of the destinations, the answer is "yes". It is a simple checking process to find which detainees are going to which countries and at what times.

  171. Can you also comment on how often and why people are removed from their homes and are not given time to collect their possessions.
  (Mr Payne) That is not a matter on which I am qualified to answer.

  172. Why not?
  (Mr Payne) Because it is a decision we do not make. We go to the premises; we are charged by the Immigration Service to effect a removal.

  173. But when you are effecting the removal, why can you not give the person time to pack their bags?
  (Mr Payne) I am sorry, at the moment we do not go to houses. We go to a variety of different detention establishments and police stations. We actually do not go to houses at the moment.

Chairman

  174. Who does?
  (Mr Payne) It is the police and the Immigration Service.

Mr Prosser

  175. Mr Payne, I think Miss Widdecombe was talking about the current targets of 30,000 removals and you have explained the limitations in your resources etc to meet that at present. What sort of discussions were taking place between you and the Government during the time that the target was 30,000 and that target was public for a period of more than 12 months?
  (Mr Payne) We dealt with the matters at hand. As I said, we are a demand led organisation who respond to the challenges and tenders put out by the Immigration Service. We did not have any sort of strategic discussions with regard to efficiency of targets.

  176. Was there not a temptation to say, "Minister, you have set a target for removals of 30,000. We are the main removal agency and we do not have anywhere near the capability of doing that"?
  (Mr Payne) We were not asked for that opinion.

Miss Widdecombe

  177. You did not think of volunteering it? You did not think, when the target was announced, of saying, "Hang on, this is not feasible"?
  (Mr Payne) I do not think it was our prerogative to do that.

  178. You were being asked to deliver the contract.
  (Mr Payne) The contract, at the time of the contract agreement, was nothing like 30,000. There have been extensions to the contract but not in relation to those sort of numbers.

  179. Are you saying—and I do not want to paraphrase you too much—that, when the target was announced, the necessary inquiries then from Government to you about enlarging the contract did not follow?
  (Mr Payne) Absolutely.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 7 May 2003