Select Committee on Health Minutes of Evidence


FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Joint memorandum by the following Chief Executives working in the area covered by the County Durham and Tees Valley Strategic Health Authority (FT23)

  Moira Britton—Chief Executive, Tees and North East Yorkshire NHS Trust, which provides services for people with mental illness and learning disability.

Ken Jarrold CBE—Chief Executive, County Durham and Tees Valley Strategic Health Authority

  Nik Patten—Deputy Chief Executive, South Tees NHS Trust which provides a full range of tertiary and secondary acute services.

  Joan Rogers—Chief Executive, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Trust which provides acute services and is an applicant for Foundation status.

  Chris Willis—Chief Executive, North Tees Primary Care Trust

  1.  The memorandum briefly comments on the following issues:

    —  the proposal to introduce NHS Foundation Trusts (para 2)

    —  financial implications (paras 3 and 4)

    —  staffing implications (paras 5-7)

    —  governance and accountability (paras 8-11)

    —  impact on quality of management and quality of patient care (para 12)

    —  impact on the wider NHS (paras 13-15)

  THE PROPOSAL TO INTRODUCE NHS FOUNDATION TRUSTS

  2.  We welcome the proposal to introduce NHS Foundation Trusts. Foundation Trusts are the logical next step in shifting the balance of power in the NHS. The 1974 reorganisation of the NHS paid little attention to the management of local services. The reforms introduced in 1982, the introduction of general management in 1984 and the establishment of NHS Trusts in the early 1990s gradually shifted the balance of power towards local management. Foundation Trusts offer the opportunity for local people working with local clinicians and managers to deliver local services.

  We believe that management will be most effective when there is maximum delegation to local level within the national framework of values, standards, regulation inspection and funding. We welcome the intention to make foundation status available to all high performing Trusts including those that provide services for people with mental illness and learning disability. It will be important to revisit the guidance on NHS Foundation Trusts to ensure that the roles and responsibilities of these Trusts are fully taken into account, including the strong emphasis on whole system working.

  3.  We welcome the financial freedoms proposed for Foundation Trusts including the ability to retain proceeds from asset disposals and operating surpluses and access to capital from public/private sources. However it is clear that these freedoms will be exercised within a strict regime supervised by the Independent Regulator. For example the access to capital is subject to a prudential borrowing requirement set by the Regulator and there is a prohibition on the use of regulated assets for borrowing. For larger projects financed by the Private Finance Initiative or NHS Capital, the current approval mechanisms will apply.

  4.  It is important to remember that an NHS Foundation Trust's principle source of revenue will be from legally binding agreements with Primary Care Trusts. Ultimately 90% of clinical activity will be paid for under the national tariff described in Reforming NHS Financial Flows. These financial arrangements will limit the ability of Foundation Trusts to pay higher salaries (see para 7) and will prevent the development of two tierism between Foundation Trusts and NHS Trusts. Most of the income of both types of organisation will come from the same source and the same tariff will apply. This means that commissioning will be about quality and volume not about price.

STAFFING IMPLICATIONS

  5.  We welcome the freedoms proposed for Foundation Trusts and in particular the:

    —  flexibility to offer new rewards and incentives;

    —  the right of staff to elect some members of the Board of Governors;

    —  the preservation of existing terms and conditions including access to the NHS Pension scheme and the requirement to pay employer contributions.

  6.  We believe that the fears about NHS Foundation Trusts paying substantially higher wages and "poaching" staff are misplaced. NHS Trusts already have scope for this but have only exercised their freedoms in a very small number of cases. However Foundation Trusts will not be able to afford to pay substantially higher wages for most staff because their income comes from the same source as NHS Trusts and they will work at the same price levels. It is important to note that NHS Trusts will also have staffing flexibilities under the proposed Agenda for Change.

  7.  NHS Foundation Trusts will be expected to participate in education and training, including providing clinical learning opportunities and placements.

GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

  8.  We welcome the governance and accountability arrangements proposed and the new form of social ownership described in the Guide to NHS Foundation Trusts. The proposals introduce a limited form of direct local democracy for the first time in the history of the NHS. All previous arrangements have involved the appointment of Chairs and non-executives. We welcome the proposal that NHS Foundation Trusts should have considerable freedom to develop governance arrangements to suit their local circumstances.

  9.  We strongly support the proposal that the main commissioning Primary Care Trusts should be represented on the Board of Governors.

  10.  We recognise that NHS managers have much to learn from colleagues in local Government about relationships with elected members and that the culture of the NHS will have to change in order to make a success of the governance arrangements.

  11.  We believe that the Boards of Governors and Management Boards of NHS Foundation Trusts should be given as much freedom as possible within the national framework, and that reporting requirements should not undermine local accountability.

IMPACT ON QUALITY AND MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY OF PATIENT CARE

  12.  We believe that the quality of management will be improved by maximum delegation to local level. The quality of patient care depends on many factors including the skills, experience and ability of the staff, the number of staff and financial, capital and equipment resources. However we believe that better management makes a contribution to the quality of patient care by developing and supporting staff, providing opportunities for professional and personal development and ensuring that the organisation obtains best value from all its resources.

IMPACT ON THE WIDER NHS

  13.  We understand the concern about relationships between NHS Foundation Trusts and the wider NHS and social care systems. However we believe that there are sufficient safeguards in the proposals to ensure that the Foundation Trusts remain part of the wider NHS. It is important to assess these safeguards in the context of the future NHS, being defined by values, standards, regulation, inspection and funding and not necessarily by provision.

  14.  The safeguards include the:

    —  powers of the Independent Regulator to agree the licence for the Trust covering a wide range of issues including the services to be provided, the application of clinical and service quality standards, the duty of partnership with other NHS and Social care bodies, financial duties, including restrictions on disposal of assets, the requirement to provide statistical and financial information;

    —  power of the Independent Regulator to require additional reporting, issue formal warnings, remove members of the Management Board, require new elections to the Board of Governors and transfer assets to another Trust;

    —  role of the Commission for Health Audit and Inspection in inspecting NHS Foundation Trusts;

    —  requirement to consult the Overview and Scrutiny Committee about any substantial change in the provision of services and the power of the Scrutiny Committee to refer the changes to the Independent Regulator;

    —  legally binding service agreements with Primary Care Trusts, based on the national pricing structure and subject to compulsory arbitration. We recognise that PCTs will need considerable development support as they prepare for these arrangements;

    —  limits on private practice as a percentage of total income;

    —  requirement to participate in Information Technology systems scheduled in the licence.

  15.  However even with these safeguards it will be important for applicants for foundation status to demonstrate at local level their commitment to relationships with the wider NHS and whole system working.

CONCLUSION

  16.  We welcome the proposal to introduce NHS Foundation Trusts as the logical next step in shifting the balance of power in the NHS.

30 January 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 7 May 2003