Select Committee on Health Second Report


SECOND REPORT


The Health Committee has agreed to the following Report:

FOUNDATION TRUSTS

SUMMARY



Political opinion remains divided over many of the fundamental questions underlying the Government's proposals for Foundation Trusts, and these broad issues will be the subject of considerable debate as the legislation necessary to introduce Foundation Trusts is presented to Parliament. Rather than attempting to anticipate these discussions, this report instead concentrates in detail on the practicalities of the policies set out in the Government's Guide to Foundation Trusts. The report examines two key issues: will the proposed changes bring about improvements for patients who are treated by Foundation hospitals? And what implications will the proposed changes have for patients being treated in the rest of the NHS?

We have identified several areas where, if they are implemented, more work will be needed to ensure these proposals bring about improvements for the patients of Foundation Trusts. Care will need to be taken to ensure that new accountability arrangements do not leave Foundation Trusts more encumbered with more bureaucracy than their predecessors. There is also considerable confusion surrounding arrangements for local accountability, and it will be vital that, if implemented, these plans do not raise expectations they are not able to meet. We also feel that it is inappropriate to leave the determination of systems for democratic accountability entirely at the discretion of individual NHS trusts, as this could lead to a system of patient and public involvement that is fragmented, confusing and inequitable. Equally, if Foundation Trusts' Boards of Governors are to wield real power, it is imperative that their relationship with PCTs, including how disputes will be solved, is established on a transparent national basis. Foundation Trusts will also need to be better integrated into the national system for patient and public involvement than is currently being proposed.

We are not convinced that it will be possible for all NHS trusts to achieve Foundation status within four to five years, not least because of logistical issues surrounding the star ratings system. We feel that using star ratings as a 'one way' gateway to Foundation status could give rise to serious contradictions within the NHS performance rating system, and we also remain concerned that current proposals lack adequate incentives for Foundation Trusts to maintain or improve their performance.

A number of issues have also arisen relating to the impact of Foundation trusts on the wider NHS. If these reforms are introduced, steps will need to be taken to prevent the introduction of Foundation Trusts from undoing the recent shift in emphasis from secondary to primary care, and stronger safeguards will be needed to ensure continued co-operation between the primary and secondary care sectors. Equally, mechanisms will need to be established to prevent Foundation Trusts attracting resources away from poorer-performing hospitals. We are concerned that in certain areas the introduction of Foundation Trusts could lead to wage inflation and 'staff poaching', and to this end we recommend that if these reforms are to go ahead, stronger safeguards will need to be introduced, including an obligation on NHS Foundation Trusts to consult other local NHS employers before altering staff terms and conditions. It may also be the case that the introduction of Foundation Trusts could, at least in the short term, risk compounding resource inequities between trusts to such an extent that the Government's long-term vision of extending Foundation status to all NHS organisations is not achievable. We have therefore stressed that, if these proposals go ahead, the impact of Foundation Trusts on the resourcing, staffing and performance of other NHS organisations must be carefully monitored to ensure equity within the NHS.

INTRODUCTION

1. The proposed establishment of NHS Foundation Trusts is an issue which has rapidly become loaded with ideological tensions, as evidenced by the headlines that have followed Government announcements on this subject:

"Milburn's 'Railtrack of the NHS"' (Guardian, 20 Jan 2002)

"NHS plan threatens mental patients" (Independent, 19 Jan 2003)

"Alarm at NHS 'companies'" (Guardian, 8 Mar 2003)

2. As well as from the more expected sources, polarised views have also been expressed by those who may usually be less forward in entering debates about the ideology of the NHS. Ken Jarrold, Chief Executive of County Durham and Tees Valley Strategic Health Authority, was reported in the Health Service Journal as describing the reforms as "the end of the NHS as we know it",[1] and the Royal College of Nursing has argued that "many clinicians are suspicious that Foundation Trusts are a threat to the service to which they are committed".[2]

3. Although initially Foundation status will only be available to 3-star organisations, the Government is quite clear about its intention that within the next four to five years it intends for all NHS acute trusts to have become Foundation Trusts. This will mean that all NHS acute trusts will be given greater autonomy than currently, and will be accountable to an appointed independent regulator, rather than directly to the Secretary of State for Health. In addition to this, boards of governors will be established by local stakeholders to attempt to strengthen local accountability.

4. Political opinion remains divided over the fundamental changes these reforms imply for the structure, make up, governance and culture of the NHS. There are many critical and difficult questions surrounding these proposals: should the three elements of the reforms, the increased financial freedoms, introduction of an independent regulator, and the reforms to local accountability, be considered and introduced separately? Will the introduction of Foundation Trusts, coupled with reforms to NHS financial flows, reintroduce some of the problems that led to the abolition of the internal market in 1997? Should chief responsibility for the NHS be moved from the Secretary of State to a regulatory body about which very little is yet known? Are high-performing acute trusts the most appropriate place at which to start these reforms?

5. These very broad, difficult issues will obviously be the subject of considerable debate as the legislation necessary to introduce Foundation Trusts is presented to Parliament. Rather than attempting to anticipate these discussions and provide conclusive answers to these questions, we have instead used this inquiry to focus in detail on the policies set out in the Government's Guide to Foundation Trusts, assuming legislation in its current form is enacted, in order to assess their likely impact on those who stand to gain or lose the most by their success or failure: current and future patients of the NHS. In doing so, we are considering the practicalities of these policies from a purely pragmatic standpoint.

6. We announced this inquiry on 20 November 2002, with the following terms of reference:

The Committee will examine Government proposals to create Foundation Trusts from existing NHS organisations, considering in particular:

  • Financial implications
  • Staffing implications
  • Governance and accountability
  • Impact on quality of management and quality of patient care
  • Impact on the wider NHS

7. Our advisers for this inquiry were: Melanie Henwood, an independent health and social care analyst; Professor John Mohan of the University of Portsmouth; Professor Nick Bosanquet of the Imperial College School of Medicine; and Séan Boyle of the London School of Economics. We are very grateful to them for their help with the more technical aspects of this inquiry. We also very grateful for the very high quality research and analytical support provided by the newly-formed Clerk's Department Scrutiny Unit.

8. We took oral evidence from the leaders of a range of NHS trusts in Teesside, Bradford, East Anglia and London. We encountered considerable reluctance amongst NHS organisations to discuss the policy of Foundation Trusts on the record at such an early stage, especially amongst organisations who were not eligible to apply for Foundation status, and so we are particularly indebted to those who agreed to give evidence. We also took very useful evidence from experts in social ownership and patient involvement, including the Co­operative Union, Mutuo, the Democratic Health Network and the Association of Community Health Councils; and from the Rt. Hon. Alan Milburn MP, Secretary of State for Health.

9. The NHS Confederation arranged an informal meeting for us with representatives of a wider cross­section of NHS organisations than we were able to take formal oral evidence from. This gave us an invaluable opportunity to gauge the views of NHS organisations off the record, and we are extremely grateful both to the NHS Confederation and to the NHS representatives who attended.

10. We received 32 written memoranda from a diverse range of interested organisations and individuals, including NHS organisations, independent healthcare providers, the BMA, the RCN, the NHS Confederation, and policy organisations and academic institutions including the King's Fund, the University of York, and the Nuffield Centre. We are very grateful to all those who submitted evidence.

11. The concept of NHS Foundation Trusts has been introduced in two key documents: the eligibility criteria and timetable document published in July 2002, and the Guide to Foundation Trusts published in December 2002.[3] The Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill which implements these reforms was introduced in the House of Commons on 12 March 2003.[4]

12. Foundation Trusts will differ from other NHS Trusts in three key areas:

  • They will have access to increased financial freedoms, including the freedom to borrow capital, sell off assets and retain surpluses.
  • They will see the relaxation of central control by the Department of Health, signalled by the removal of the Secretary of State's powers of direction. Linked to this will be greater management freedoms, including increasing flexibilities to reward staff. Foundation Trusts will be governed by an independent regulator appointed by the Secretary of State.
  • They will have to establish a new Board of Governors which will be elected in part by local communities.

13. The first wave of Foundation Trusts will be drawn from 3-star Trusts according to the performance ratings published in July 2003, whose application is approved by the Secretary of State. The aim of the Government is that, subject to sufficient performance improvement across the NHS, all NHS acute trusts will "graduate" to Foundation status within the next four to five years.[5] In the first instance, Foundation status will not be available to Primary Care Trusts (PCTs), mental health trusts or other types of NHS trust, although this may happen in the future. Subject to legislation, successful organisations will become 'shadow' Foundation Trusts in October 2003, and will begin operating as Foundation Trusts in April 2004.[6] To set these reforms in context, a summary of the freedoms and constraints within which NHS organisations currently operate is included in an Annex. The past 12 months have seen a number of significant structural reforms in the NHS, the most relevant of which are also summarised in the Annex for ease of reference.

Report outline

14. Our report is divided into two chapters which aim to explore what we believe to be the two key issues that will determine the success of this policy:

    2.  What implications will the proposed changes have for patients being treated in the rest of the NHS?


1  
Health Service Journal, 5th December 2002 Back

2   Ev 113 Back

3   Foundation Trusts - eligibility criteria and timetable, Department of Health, July 2002; A Guide to Foundation Trusts, Department of Health, December 2002 Back

4   Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. Back

5   Q 482 (Secretary of State for Health) Back

6   A Guide to Foundation Trusts, Department of Health, December 2002, p 44 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 7 May 2003