Select Committee on Health Second Report


ANNEX

Background to Foundation Trusts

Earned autonomy

1.  While the new governance arrangements for Foundation Trusts represent a departure from the system that applies to the rest of the NHS, reforms stemming from the NHS Plan's promise of a system of 'earned autonomy' mean that there is already a continuum of freedom and flexibility in the NHS acute hospitals, with four distinct levels linked directly to organisations' performance in the star ratings system. These freedoms are set out in full in Raising Standards Across the NHS - a Programme of Rewards and Support for all trusts, and are supplemented by Agenda for Change, the recently published NHS­wide human resources framework.

3­star trusts

2.  3­star trusts currently receive:

i.  More resources, including automatic access in 2002­03 to up to £1m additional capital, depending on the size of the trust; higher delegated limits for approval of capital investments; freedom to retain more of the proceeds of local land sales; and access to additional Local Capital Modernisation Funds;

ii.  More autonomy ­ reduced central reporting requirements, fewer inspections and greater freedom to set up "spin­off" companies;

iii.  More influence - 3­star trusts are used as pilot sites for new initiatives, their chief executives contribute to developing the policy on earned autonomy and their staff support modernisation work (for which the trust can apply to be reimbursed);

iv.  More opportunities - 3­star trusts can apply for NHS Foundation Trust status and automatically go on the NHS Franchising Register of Expertise, giving them the opportunity to bid for franchises of failing trusts.

2-star trusts

3.  2­star NHS trusts are viewed by the Department as "organisations which are already performing well overall across the range of indicators, but which need to improve in particular areas". They are subject to the normal reporting arrangements, but do have access to some of the "earned autonomy"freedoms, namely higher delegated limits for approval of capital investments and the freedom to retain more of the proceeds of local land sales and additional freedom when establishing "spin out" companies. Proposals are also being drawn up to lighten the inspection burden on 2- as well as 3­star trusts.

1-star trusts

4.  1­star NHS trusts are organisations which are "giving some cause for concern against particular key targets". This means there will be much closer oversight by the relevant Strategic Health Authority (SHA). The trust will be supported by the SHA in developing plans to improve the trust's position, and on occasion key personnel will be seconded in, for example at chief executive level, to drive forward improvements. All 1­star acute trusts will be expected to participate in Modernisation Agency's Hospital Improvement Partnership programme (HIP), which is aimed at achieving better care without delay along whole hospital pathways, and contributing substantially to reductions in waiting times. The Department of Health estimates that this expert support from the Modernisation Agency will be worth the equivalent of £200,000 per trust, and further financial help will also be available where needed.

0­star trusts

5.  0­star NHS trusts, as "organisations showing the poorest levels of performance against key targets", are required to produce Performance Improvement Plans within three months of their 0­star rating, to demonstrate how they intend to turn the organisation around. The most hard­pressed health communities, including where appropriate 0­star trusts, are able to access support from the NHS Bank, a centrally­managed £100 million Special Assistance Fund, to facilitate service improvements. 0­star trusts also receive a targeted programme delivered by two teams in the Modernisation Agency, the Performance Improvement Team (where a trust has failed key access targets) and the Clinical Governance Team (where the cause of the 0-star rating is an adverse review by the Commission for Health Improvement (CHI)).

6.  The last resort for failing 0­star trusts, where the SHA considers that there is insufficient capacity within the trust to deliver the necessary improvements, is to franchise the management. The Department has now published an official 'franchisers' register, to which all 3­star trusts are automatically added, but which also includes appropriately qualified private companies. If a trust comes up for franchising, any organisation on this register may apply to take it over.

Further freedoms for Foundation Trusts

7.  The Guide states that

An NHS Foundation Trust, as an organisation with a proven track record of success in delivery of care for NHS patients, and in management and financial prudence, will have increased financial freedoms in three key areas:

·  to retain proceeds from asset disposal

·  to retain any operating surpluses

·  to access capital from public and/or private sector sources based on financial performance and not on the basis of national or local capital rationing by the Department of Health or SHAs.

Like other NHS Trusts, Foundation Trusts will also continue to have access to capital through the Private Finance Initiative.[212]

8. Foundation Trusts will not be able to dispose of certain 'regulated assets' which are deemed necessary for clinical care. An example of an 'unregulated asset' frequently given by the Department is a hospital car park, but it is not yet clear exactly where the line will be drawn between regulated and unregulated assets.

Staffing freedoms and Agenda for Change

9. Following the establishment of the internal market in the early 1990s, trusts were able to set their own terms and conditions for staff. Although different professional groups have their terms, conditions and grading structures negotiated nationally, trusts have considerable flexibility about the gradings they give to posts, or for example about one­off recruitment bonuses they can offer to staff.

10. These difficulties have led to the publication of Agenda for Change, which sets out a national pay framework for the whole of the NHS. The reforms bring all NHS staff, with the exception of doctors, dentists and very senior managers into an integrated payscale. If accepted, this will mean that in future, for most employees, basic pay will be determined according to job weight. Job weight will be determined using a standardised NHS job evaluation scheme, which will measure 16 factors covering knowledge and skills, responsibilities, and the physical, mental or emotional effort required. Evaluations of common NHS jobs are currently being finalised on a national basis. Staff will progress up the relevant payspine at an incremental rate, and the system includes provision for an initial 10% uplift over three years for all staff. Staff will also be subject to standardised arrangements for working hours, overtime, on­call and annual leave payment. Another aim of the framework is to harmonise the current disparate system of allowances available for staff working in high­cost areas. The Agenda for Change framework represents an attempt to standardise job roles and pay between NHS organisations as well as within them. However, over and above normal pay arrangements, different types of trusts will have different levels of freedom in relation to certain aspects of the settlement.

11. 0-, 1- and 2-star trusts will be able to offer recruitment and retention premiums to staff coming to posts which are difficult to recruit to, but these will be limited to no more than 30% of basic pay, and will be subject to explicit formal agreement by the NHS Staff Council and, where appropriate, the local Strategic Health Authority.

12. 3-star trusts will be able to offer recruitment and retention premiums at levels above 30% of basic pay without formal agreement from the NHS Staff Council or the Strategic Health authority but will be required to consult with local or neighbouring employers before final decisions are taken on the use of these freedoms

13. Foundation Trusts will be able to award Recruitment and Retention Premia above 30% of basic pay, without prior clearance for the Staff Council or Strategic Health Authority, and without the requirement to consult with local or neighbouring employers. Foundation Trusts will also be able to offer individual, team or organisational performance reward schemes, which must be related to "genuinely measurable" targets. Foundation Trusts will also have further flexibility to offer alternatives in the packages of compensatory benefits available as long as they are of an equivalent value to those in the Agenda for Change framework (for example greater leave entitlements but longer hours). They will be able to establish schemes offering additional non­pay benefits above the minimum specified in Agenda for Change and will be able to offer accelerated development and progression schemes, giving them greater autonomy to enhance career progression.

Current governance arrangements in the NHS

14. Currently, NHS trusts are subject to the direction of the Secretary of State, which means that although in practice they may be permitted greater or lesser degrees of freedom, the Government retains ultimate control over organisations, and is able to issue directives concerning the conduct of any of their functions. The Government has drawn attention to its efforts to curtail the relentless flow of central directives from Department of Health officials to the chief executives of NHS organisations. However, fewer central directives do not necessarily correlate directly to increased freedom and flexibility, as performance management and control over a trust's activities is now filtered through two more local layers of performance management and control. Firstly, PCTs, as budget holders, hold NHS trusts to account for the delivery of the services they have commissioned. PCTs have their own performance managed by Strategic Health Authorities through Local Delivery Plans, which must include key targets set by the centre, including, for example waiting times and performance in key clinical areas such as cancer and coronary heart disease. Secondly, overarching Strategic Health Authorities have a responsibility for keeping a strategic overview of all the PCTs and NHS trusts in their area, and will step in if problems arise.

15. As well as the performance management that is conducted between NHS organisations, NHS trusts also now have their performance assessed publicly, in the annual star ratings compiled and published by the Department. The star ratings system is discussed more fully below. There is also now another aspect of performance management, ostensibly separate from government, but still issuing central targets. The Commission for Health Improvement is a Non­Departmental Public Body which carries out large­scale reviews of clinical governance in each trust once in every four­year period. Subject to legislation, the Commission for Health Improvement will be replaced by the Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection (CHAI), which will also take over the National Care Standards Commission's responsibilities for licensing private healthcare providers. CHAI's new inspection regime will consist of annual assessment of each NHS organisation's performance against targets and standards set by the Secretary of State, and publication of performance ratings.

New governance arrangements for Foundation Trusts

16. The Guide pledged that "NHS Foundation Trusts will be guaranteed, in law, freedom from Secretary of State powers of direction, removing control from Whitehall and replacing it with greater local public ownership and accountability". It is not yet clear what this will mean in practice, but the Secretary of State told the Committee it was his intention to 'codify' exactly what freedoms there would be.

17. Foundation Trusts will be accountable to the local communities they serve via an elected Board of Governors, and PCTs will also hold them to account for efficient service delivery through the contracting process. Both of these aspects of governance are discussed more fully below. In addition to this Foundation Trusts will be subject to a number of other central controls. Firstly, CHAI will conduct annual reviews of performance against central targets and standards, culminating in a star ratings. In addition to this, there will be an independent regulator which will issue and review Foundation Trusts' licences, which will specify the clinical services it must provide to the local community, its duty of partnership with other NHS and social care bodies, the circumstances in which it can make changes in the services it provides for NHS patients, and the financial duties under which it will operate, including reference to the prudential borrowing regime and restrictions on the disposal of assets used in the provision of NHS clinical services.

18. The independent regulator will also agree the prudential borrowing limit for each Foundation Trust, decide on changes to regulated services, consent to the disposal of regulated assets and ensure that the proceeds from such disposals will be used in the public interest. The independent regulator will be able to intervene when there is suspicion that a Foundation Trust may be in breach of its license. Triggers for intervention could include information from the Board of Governors, an adverse CHAI inspection report, or financial information provided by the Trust. There is a range of 'step in' powers that the independent regulator could exercise including the imposition of extra inspections, warning letters, removal of some or all of the Management Board, and ordering new elections to the Board of Governors. In the worst cases they could recommend that the assets of the Trust are transferred to another NHS body.

Star Ratings

 19. The Government's star ratings system, according to which each NHS trust is given a rating from zero to three, will serve as a gateway to Foundation status, with all 3-star trusts being eligible to apply. The Government began publishing NHS Performance Ratings in September 2001. In the first year this only covered those trusts providing acute hospital services, but in July 2002, the system was extended to include other types of NHS organisations, including mental health trusts and ambulance trusts, although PCTs and Strategic Health Authorities were still deemed too new to be given meaningful ratings.

20. Trusts are awarded a star rating of between zero and three stars based on their Commission for Health Improvement (CHI) report and performance against nine key targets and 28 Performance Indicators (PIs) in the previous year. The current nine key targets are:

· 18­month inpatient waits

· 15­month inpatient waits

· 26­week outpatient waits

· 12­hour trolley waits

· Cancelled operations

· Two­week cancer waits

· Improving working lives

· Hospital cleanliness

· Financial management.

21. The three different factors which determine information sources which feed into the ratings system do not command equal weight. A poor rating on the key targets will assign it to one or zero stars, regardless of how well it does on the remaining 28 Performance Indicators, which cover "Clinical Focus", "Patient Focus" and "Capacity & Capability". The PI assessment is done on a 'balanced scorecard' approach, where each trust receives a rating between 1 (significantly below average) and 5 (significantly above average) for each indicator. An individual trust's performance is then compared to all other trusts for each of three focus areas. This is used to allocate one­ and two­ star ratings for trusts with a few failings in their key targets and two­ and three­ stars for those that achieved all or nearly all the key targets.

22. 3­star status is not a guarantee of very high performance in every aspect of the performance assessment process. Although CHI reviews form part of the star­rating performance, these are only included when a trust has had a CHI review in the past year. 12 of the 32 3­star trusts applying for Foundation status (38%) did not have a CHI review taken account of in the most recent round of star­ratings. Equally, a trust can underachieve on one of the key targets (including financial management) and still achieve three stars. If a trust that does very well in its key targets and if it has a current CHI review showing significant strengths and no weaknesses, then it will be awarded three stars regardless of its performance on the other 28 PIs. Many 2-star trusts do significantly better on the 28 performance indicators than the worst performing 3­star trusts.

Reforms to financial flows and commissioning arrangements

23. Shifting the Balance of Power, published in April 2001, set the scene for large­scale structural reform of the NHS, which was implemented through the NHS Reform and Healthcare Professionals Act 2002. PCTs are now taking over commissioning responsibilities from recently abolished Health Authorities, and Department of Health Regional Offices have been replaced by Strategic Health Authorities. PCTs have now received their first 3­year funding allocations, calculated on the basis of a new resource allocation formula. By 2004, PCTs are set to control 75% of the total NHS budget, a figure which is set to increase further by 2008.

Reforming NHS Financial Flows

24. Delivering the NHS Plan promised the establishment of a new system of 'payment by results' as an incentive for hospitals to improve their performance, and in October 2002, the Department of Health issued Reforming NHS Financial Flows: introducing payment by results, setting out plans for changes in the way that healthcare providers will be in paid in the NHS. These plans include reforms to the way in which Primary Care Trusts contract with NHS hospitals, and reforms to the pricing system.

25. Starting in 2003­04, a fixed level of services will be contracted with in each trust in order to meet waiting list targets. However, over and above this, hospitals will be paid on a case by case basis. Historically, NHS commissioners have relied on 'block contracting' to purchase care for NHS patients, where funding is fixed regardless of activity, and need is projected on the basis of historical precedents. Theoretically this means that there is little flexibility or incentive for hospitals to improve efficiency and outperform on their contracts, as funding limits have already been set. Reforming NHS Financial Flows specifies that in future Service Level Agreements (SLAs) must include 'explicit links between funding and the volume of services provided'. SLAs will need be agreed at a specialty level, starting with six specialties (ophthalmology, cardiothoracic surgery, ear nose and throat surgery, trauma and orthopaedics, general surgery, and urology). According to the Department, the new system will guarantee that "hospitals generally only receive funding for the activity they actually deliver". Hospitals who perform fewer procedures than they have agreed to over a set timeframe could have their funding reduced in­year.

26. Currently, the rate at which hospitals are paid for the services they provide for their patients is calculated using a system of 'NHS Reference Costs'. These costs are supposed to provide a genuine reflection of how much a particular procedure or intervention costs to perform, but are weighted to take account of local cost variations, for example in the prices charged by suppliers, or in staff wages. However, Reforming NHS Financial Flows promises a new system based on a single national tariff. Prices will be determined through a system of 'Healthcare Resource Groups' (HRGs) which will exist within different surgical and medical specialities, covering individual procedures. HRGs within the initial six specialties (for example cataract extraction) will have a national tariff price set, and HRGs will enable commissioners to adjust contracts to reflect the precise casemix. Because there will eventually be a comprehensive range of national tariffs, trusts will not be able to compete with each other on the basis of price, but Foundation Trusts will be able to keep any surplus they generate from treating patients at a cost lower than the national tariff.

27. These reforms will be phased in gradually over the next three years. By 2005­06, the Department expects 'most Trust activity to be commissioned on the basis of cost­and­volume agreements' and for 30­45 HRGs to be commissioned on the basis of output targets and funded at the national tariff. Foundation Trusts and the PCTs who commission services from them will be expected to implement these changes at an accelerated rate.

Introducing patient choice

28. As well as improving efficiency, the Government hopes that allowing PCTs the freedom to contract with providers more flexibly will enable improved patient choice, including greater choice of hospital, with "cash following the patient". The concept of patient choice will be reinforced by 'patient prospectuses', which will be published by PCTs to give comparative information on local health providers. This policy is already being be taken forward, and a pilot scheme has been running since last year, whereby patients in London who have waited over six months for a heart operation are able to choose to be treated by a different provider, either within the NHS, privately in the UK, or abroad. This scheme is currently being extended to cover patients in London waiting more than six months for any types of elective surgery by this summer, and rolled out throughout England by summer 2004. Choice will also begin to be offered routinely to all patients regardless of how long they have been waiting: Reforming NHS Financial Flows states that 'patients needing elective surgery will be offered choice of provider at the point of referral by 2005'.


212   A Guide to Foundation Trusts, Department of Health, December 2002, p12 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 7 May 2003