Select Committee on Health Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 16

Letter from the Secretary of State for Health to the Chairman of the Committee (21A)

NHS FOUNDATION TRUSTS

  When I gave evidence to the Committee on 4 March I promised to write with further information on several points that had been raised.

  First, I understand that you have been sent, separately, a list of the 32 preliminary applications that have been received for NHS Foundation Trust status.

  You asked for further information on "Foundation-type" healthcare institutions in Spain—this is attached at Annex A.

  I also undertook to provide more information about the package of support the Department of Health will be providing for PCTs commissioning services from NHS Foundation Trusts. This will complement the support arrangements and learning opportunities already being provided through National Primary and Care Trust Development Programme and will include:

    —  development of model "template" contracts, including standard terms and conditions, for PCTs to adopt when commissioning services from NHS Foundation Trusts;

    —  access to formal training and development opportunities;

    —  spreading best practice through an internet based support network;

    —  access to specialist advice to support contract negotiation and the development of effective arrangements for contract management.

  The rest of this letter addresses additional points that you raised in your letter of 7 March. The paragraph numbers relate to the numbering in your letter.

ROLL-OUT OF NHS FOUNDATION TRUST STATUS

1.   The Secretary of State is quite clear about his intention to roll out Foundation status to all NHS Trusts in the next four to five years. However, as the present star-rating system relies on relative rather then absolute scoring for the 28 Ps, how will this work? Will the relative element be of the star ratings system be removed? (For example, under the current system, if there are only two non-Foundation Trusts left in the NHS, both of whom do well in their CHI review and their key targets, then unless they get absolutely identical scores on all 28 Pls, then one will be a three-star and one will not)

  The Commission for Health Improvement (and after April 2004 the Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection) will develop and produce performance ratings for NHS organisations consistent with the targets and priorities that the Department of Health sets for the service. Although the present system uses relative scoring for the "balanced score card" this may be reviewed. The structure of the performance rating system will need to take account of the mixed economy of both NHS foundation and non-foundation trusts for a number of years.

  It is also important to remember that overall standards in the NHS are rising—in future two-star organisations may be the equivalent of today's three-star—and that the test for NHS Foundation Trust status does not rely solely on the star ratings.

2.   What is the likely timescale for extending Foundation status to Primary Care Trusts, Mental Health Trusts, and Ambulance Trusts?

  At present, the timetable for establishment of NHS Foundation Trusts applies only to acute and specialist NHS Trusts. However, we are keen to learn from this experience and to examine how the NHS Foundation Trust model could be adapted for other NHS organisations in due course. I will be writing to NHS mental health Trusts about these issues soon, but not to PCTs for reasons I set out to the committee.

3.   The Guide to Foundation Trusts states that eventually NHS Foundation Trust status "may be available to organisations that are not currently part of the NHS" What types of organisations are envisaged here?

  The model will be flexible enough to be adopted by organisations that are not currently part of the NHS but that hold similar values and can contribute to wider health service objectives.

  The Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill provides for NHS Foundation Trusts to be established as independent, Public Benefit Corporations. A non NHS Trust applicant for NHS Foundation Trust status would first have to set up a new Public Benefit Corporation to prepare a full application for consideration by the Independent Regulator. The Independent Regulator will be able to consider any applications to set up Public Benefit Corporations that are supported by the Secretary of State.

WORKFORCE ISSUES

4.   In evidence to the Committee, the Secretary of State mentioned safeguards that will be put in place to guard against aggressive poaching of staff and ensure NHS Foundation Trusts use their additional recruitment flexibilities in a way which is "consistent with the needs of other local NHS organisations".

  (a)   Precisely what safeguards will these be?

  (b)   If these safeguards are to be included as part of a Foundation Trust's license, will other NHS organisations, such as Strategic Health Authorities, PCTs and other non-Foundation acute Trusts be able to refer a Foundation Trust to the regulator if they believe it is engaging in aggressive recruitment policies that are to the detriment of other local services?

  (c)   What evidence will be used to determine whether or not "poaching" of staff has actually taken place?

  There is nothing wrong with a member of staff leaving one Trust and going to another. Such movement may, for example, relate to opportunities for career development in the NHS and does not necessarily depend on remuneration or terms of service. There will be a number of safeguards to prevent abuse of the new freedoms available to NHS Foundation Trusts:

    —  all NHS foundation trusts will, presuming it is agreed, operate under the new Agenda for Change pay system;

    —  other local NHS organisations would be able to exercise influence over the running of an NHS Foundation Trust through its membership and participation in governance arrangements;

    —  NHS Foundation Trusts will be subject to a statutory duty of partnership just like other NHS Trusts;

    —  NHS Foundation Trusts will provide services at the national tariff rate and will be subject to a system of financial flows that operates on the principle of payment by results. They will not be able to increase charges for clinical services to reflect higher wage costs; and

    —  under the national tariff any cost increases relating to enhanced terms and conditions for staff would have to be absorbed by NHS Foundation Trusts themselves and it will not be in their interest to take action leading to local wage inflation.

  The Independent Regulator will be able to consider submissions put forward by other NHS bodies and will have a range of powers to take action in the event that a NHS Foundation Trust breaches its licence or statutory obligations. But intervention would have to be proportionate and the Independent Regulator would have discretion to decide what, if any, action to take depending on the particular circumstances of each case.

NEW FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS

5.   The Secretary of State told the Committee in evidence that proposals for Foundation Trusts had drawn on proposals put forward by the New Economics Foundation. These proposals indicate that Foundation Trust-type organisations might consider charging patients for some "non core" services. Are there currently any plans for Foundation Trusts to be able to extend charges to patients?

  No. NHS Foundation Trusts will be prevented by their terms of authorisation from extending provisions to charge NHS patients. All NHS patients will continue to receive care free at the point of use based on clinical need and not ability to pay. They are part of the NHS.

6.   Can the Department give a clear definition of which assets would be regarded as regulated and which would be unregulated? If a Foundation Trust borrows against its unregulated assets, and the income required to service such borrowing fails to materialise, what effects would this have on the trust's ability to provide services? What analysis has the department carried out of the risks which might be associated with the distinction between regulated and unregulated assets?

  The Independent Regulator will determine which assets should be designated as "protected" (regulated) taking account amongst other things of:

    —  the need for particular services in the NHS (in the local area, or regionally or nationally for tertiary services);

    —  availability of alternative provision;

    —  any interdependencies between services or with training and education; and

    —  contracts with NHS commissioners.

  Decisions on which assets should be protected will relate to the particular circumstances of each NHS Foundation Trust rather than a specified list. Assets that are not designated as protected could include, for example, private clinical facilities, retail premises, and car parks (to the extent that they are not deemed to be essential).

  NHS Foundation Trusts will borrow primarily on the strength of their projected cash flows. Protected assets (those used to provide essential NHS services) will not be available as security for borrowing. Where necessary, other assets will be available as additional security for borrowing. If an NHS Foundation Trust was unable to service borrowing the lender would be able to use security held against (unprotected) assets to induce restructuring of the NHS Foundation Trust's debts and/or recover their costs but continuity of protected services would be assured. The Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill includes provision for a special regime which will protect essential assets and provide a clear process for dealing with creditors in the event of financial failure.

7.   Foundation trusts are free to borrow, but their borrowing will be constrained within departmental limits. Can the Department explain whether or not Foundation Trust capital schemes will consequently take precedence over capital schemes for non-Foundation Trusts? Will a proportion of the NHS capital budget be "earmarked" for first-wave Foundation Trusts?

  Capital allocations will not be specifically calculated for NHS Foundation Trusts. Access to capital will, in the future, be based on the strength of an NHS Foundation Trust's projected revenue/cash flows ie, their ability to service debt and not on the basis of centrally controlled capital allocations. Under the new financial flows regime being rolled out across the NHS all NHS providers will be paid the same for the same service. Any borrowing costs that NHS Foundation Trusts incur will be met from surpluses generated through efficiency gains and not through charging commissioners more for services.

  Each NHS Foundation Trust will be able to borrow up to a prudential limit assessed by the Independent Regulator based on the individual Trust's ability to service the borrowing.

  Allocations of "strategic" and "block" capital have already been made to Strategic Health Authorities and NHS Trusts respectively for the next three years (and include increases of £263 million and 44%). We are satisfied that within the overall funds available to the Department capital spending by NHS Foundation Trusts can be financed without adversely affecting NHS Trusts.

REGULATION AND INSPECTION

8.   In the absence of written evidence from the Commission for Health Improvement, can you confirm:

  (a)   Exactly what will the CHAI inspection regime consist of for Foundation Trusts?

  (b)   What performance targets will Foundation Trusts be expected to meet?

  (c)   Will Foundation Trusts continue to be awarded annual star-ratings in the same way as non-Foundation Trusts?

  The new Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection will be responsible for carrying out inspections of NHS Foundation Trusts against criteria agreed with the Secretary of State and taking account of the same national clinical and quality standards as apply to other providers of NHS services.

  From 2004 the Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection will be responsible for awarding performance (star) ratings across all NHS providers. The new ratings system will include NHS Foundation Trusts.

9.   What powers does the regulator have to require the provision of new services where none currently exists? How would the regulator manage circumstances in which (a) a foundation trust was declining to provide a service and (b) no suitable alternatives were available in the locality?

10.   Trusts must meet "reasonable demand" for regulated services. What happens when they decline to do so or if they declare that levels of demand are "unreasonable"?

11.   If projections of "reasonable demand" are based on existing levels of caseload and the particular casemix treated, what happens if, as a result of demographic changes, levels of demand rise in a particular locality? What guarantees can be given that PCTs will always and everywhere be able to commission services to meet the needs of local people?

12.   What will happen if a Board of Governors refuses to approve strategic plans related to meeting national priorities which do not match its own local priorities?

  Funding for NHS services will, as now, be held by Primary Care Trusts who will develop their commissioning strategies taking account of priorities set at local, regional and national level. Three year financial allocations are made direct to PCTs. The allocations are based on a weighted capitation formula that takes account of population size and demography. The "need" element of the formula has been updated for the 2003-04 to 2005-06 allocations so that it uses better measures of deprivation. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's Indices of Multiple Deprivation, for example, provide a useful up-to-date set of validated measures of area deprivation, that are capable of being updated regularly.

  PCTs will always be the major, and often the only, contractors for the services provided by NHS Foundation Trusts. As such, PCTs can be expected to exercise considerable influence in the development of NHS Foundation Trust strategic plans—including plans for development of new services.

  Alongside this the representatives of local people, members of staff and partnership organisations on NHS Foundation Trust Boards of Governors will have a major role in shaping the way that NHS Foundation Trusts respond to PCT commissioning needs.

  Given these two points its difficult to see how a service (new or existing) that local people wanted or which PCTs were willing to fund would not be provided to the levels necessary to meet reasonable demand.

  Under the terms of its authorisation an NHS Foundation Trust will be required to provide certain NHS services for NHS patients (protected services). The designation of services as protected in the terms of authorisation for an NHS Foundation Trust will mean that it is obliged to maintain those services and continue to offer them for NHS patients. It would be in breach of its terms of authorisation if it refused to provide such services and no suitable alternatives were available in the locality. The Independent Regulator will have discrete powers to intervene in cases of breach including, for example, issue of formal or informal warnings or imposition of special measures to require the NHS Foundation Trust to continue to provide the service. In extremis if the situation was not resolved, the Independent Regulator would have powers to remove some or all of the management board or revoke the licence and recommend that the assets be transferred to another NHS body or merged with another NHS Foundation Trust.

  Contracts between Primary Care Trusts and NHS Foundation Trusts will specify the volume, standards and time scale for the provision of NHS services. NHS Foundation Trusts and commissioning PCTs will be expected to agree on the definition of reasonable demand for a particular service. Ultimately the Independent Regulator would be able to decide, on the basis of the available evidence, if a level of demand was reasonable or unreasonable.

13.   If a Foundation Trust and a non-Foundation Trust bring forward proposals—eg new investment—which would result in duplication of services, what powers would be available to the regulator to prevent this?

  Strategic Health Authorities will continue to have a significant role in shaping the overall development of services in their area, backed by the commissioning decisions of Primary Care Trusts. For more specialised services "lead" commissioning arrangements (where one PCT commissions services on behalf of others) should determine the optimum provision. "Local" services inevitably involve some "duplication"—most acute hospitals offer a similar range of services. Developments in both areas will reflect the overall expansion of the NHS funded through increased investment to bring about a greater range and depth of high quality services that are more convenient for patients.

  New capital investment by NHS Foundation Trusts will need to be financed through revenue streams. Indeed the financial regime for NHS Foundation Trusts will involve repayment of loans. And payment for NHS services under a fixed national tariff will mean that more risk than now will be entailed in undertaking capital investment where there is no certainty that PCT funding will be forthcoming.

14.   How, both in principle and in practice, will the role and powers of the Independent Regulator differ from that of the Secretary of State for Health?

  The office of the Independent Regulator will be established as a non-ministerial Department accountable to Parliament and not subject to direction from the Secretary of State. The Independent Regulator will operate within a discrete statutory framework and will not replicate the Secretary of State's existing powers of direction or have a role in performance management—which can affect the day to day running of NHS Foundation Trusts. In normal circumstances the Independent Regulator will have no reason to intervene in the running of NHS Foundation Trusts. The office of the Independent Regulator is designed to give NHS Foundation Trusts maximum freedom to operate while safeguarding the interests of NHS patients and the wider NHS.

  The Independent Regulator will have powers to:

    —  set the terms of authorisation (licence) for NHS Foundation Trusts including the list of services and property that are designated as protected;

    —  monitor the operation of NHS Foundation Trusts to ensure they remain within the terms of the licence and legislation. (This will include the ability to require information from NHS Foundation Trusts but only to the extent necessary to perform this function); and

    —  intervene in the running of an NHS Foundation Trust either to prevent a breach of the licence or in the case of a breach of the licence. The legislation will provide for graduated step-in powers of intervention which the Independent Regulator will be able to use in the event of non-compliance, ranging from the issuing of warning letters to revocation of the terms of authorisation.

NEW LOCAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS

15.   Could the Department confirm whether the Board of Governors and the Management Boards of Foundation Trusts will share a Chair or have different Chairs?

  One person will be elected to chair both the Board of Governors and the Management Board.

16.   The Board of Governors will have a role in approving the appointment of the Chief Executive and executive directors, but does it have the power to sack executive directors or dissolve the management board?

  The Board of Governors will be responsible for appointment, or removal, of the Chair and non-executive directors of an NHS Foundation Trust. However, unless specifically provided for in a particular Trust's constitution, any action to remove the whole Board would have to be initiated through a reference to the Independent Regulator. The Independent Regulator will have a range of powers to take action if the NHS Foundation Trust is failing to comply with its terms of authorisation or statutory obligations.

16.   The Guide states that "The main function of the Board of Governors will be to work with the Management Board to ensure that the NHS Foundation Trust acts in a way that is consistent with its objects and with the conditions under which it is licensed to operate (see Chapter 3), and to help set the strategic direction," It also specifies that the Board will meet at least three times a year to do this. At these meetings, will the Board of Governors have the explicit right to veto plans made by the Management Board, or will the Board's only recourse be to refer the matter to the Independent Regulator?

  The provisions in the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill are designed to create a two-part governance system with distinct, but complementary rather than adversarial, roles for the two boards of an NHS Foundation Trust. Both will work to the same objects and be required to ensure that the Trust complies with its statutory duties and terms of authorisation. The Board of Governors will be responsible for appointing the Chair and non-executive Directors and will have a right to be consulted on the forward business plans that the Board of Directors proposes. It is therefore very unlikely that major disagreements would arise. But the Board of Governors will, if necessary, be able to use its power to dismiss the Chair or non-executive Directors of an NHS Foundation Trust (subject to approval by 75% of the members of the Board).

  The constitutions for individual NHS Foundation Trusts may give additional powers to the Board of Governors beyond the minimum specified in the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill. These constitutions will be determined following discussion with local stakeholders and may only be amended with the approval of the Independent Regulator.

17.   If disputes arise between the elected majority of a Board of Governors and its PCT representatives, how will these be managed?

  In all cases disputes among the Board of Governors could be put to a vote and, subject to locally determined voting rules, the majority view would carry.

18.   Which aspects of the activities of Foundation Trusts will not be open to public scrutiny? What differences will there be on this point compared to existing NHS trusts?

  The provisions in the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill will provide for enhanced public scrutiny of the activities of NHS Foundation Trusts. Membership will be open to people in the local area, patients and their carers who use the services it provides and to staff. The members' elected representatives on the Board of Governors will have a statutory right to be consulted by the Board of Directors and meetings of the Board of Governors will be open to the public.

  NHS Foundation Trusts will be required to publish an annual report and accounts and to send copies of these documents and other specified information to the Companies Registrar, who will be required to establish a register of NHS Foundation Trusts.

  In addition, an NHS Foundation Trust, like other NHS bodies, will be expected to develop a co-operative working relationship with the local Overview and Scrutiny Committee and will be under a duty to respond to requests for information by the Committee. The Chief Executive of the NHS Foundation Trust may be required to attend Overview and Scrutiny Committee meetings to answer questions and explain decisions. It will also be subject to a duty to consult the Overview and Scrutiny Committee at an early stage on plans for substantial developments or variation of services that are designated as protected under its terms of authorisation.

19.   Second stage applications will need to provide evidence that key NHS stakeholders and others in the local community support both the short and medium term goals (para 7.10 of the Guide). Applications will be assessed by a panel of experts. It is stated in the Guide that the application process will be transparent and fair. Does this mean that the criteria used to assess these applications will be made public, and if so at what stage of the process? How will the panel of experts be selected?

  Details of what will be required will be made available at the start of the second-stage process.

  The Department will set up a panel to help in development and assessment of second stage applications. The panel will include people from inside and outside the Department of Health selected for their expertise in particular fields that are relevant to the development of NHS Foundation Trust applications.

20.   Members of an NHS Foundation Trust are to be drawn from people living in the local area and patients of the NHS Foundation Trust, and employees of the NHS Foundation Trust. What proportion of the local population would be expected to register as members?

  It would be wrong to set a particular figure for local membership. The Independent Regulator will only authorise an application for NHS Foundation Trust status when he or she is satisfied that amongst other things, the constitution meets the statutory requirements and necessary steps to prepare for Foundation status have been taken. This will mean looking, for example, at whether the applicant has got the right processes in place and taken steps to establish a membership base appropriate to its particular circumstances taking account of local factors including:

    —  the type of services provided by the NHS Foundation Trust;

    —  the number of other NHS Trusts in the area;

    —  the success of local public/patient involvement strategies; and

    —  the success of campaigns advertising for membership.

  Particular attention will be paid to ensuring fair representation of all sections of the community.

21.   Could clarification be provided on how the membership is to be drawn for those specialist NHS Foundation Trusts that serve a national (rather then predominantly local) population base?

  NHS Foundation Trusts will be expected to propose their own membership arrangements based on the framework set out in legislation. Membership will be open to people who live in the area where the Trust is located and may (depending on individual NHS Foundation Trust constitutions) also be open to people living outside the area who have been patients of the Trust or their carers. NHS Foundation Trusts providing specialist services can be expected to draw a higher proportion of members from the out of area patient group than those serving a predominantly local population base.

  22.   What controls will be retained over the use of the charitable assets of foundation trusts? Will foundation trusts be able to use such sources of income to subsidise other services?

  The existing controls over the use of charitable assets will remain for NHS Foundation Trusts. In particular, sections 91 and 96A(4) of the 1977 Act will apply to NHS Foundation Trusts. This has the effect that any property given on trust must be applied for the purpose it was given. In addition, the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill gives the Secretary of State for Health powers to appoint trustees for an NHS Foundation Trust to manage charitable assets on its behalf. These arrangements are analogous to those set out under the 1977 Act for NHS Trusts. As for NHS Trusts, the appointment of trustees will be delegated to the NHS Appointments Commission. The legislation also provides that trustees for an NHS Trust that becomes an NHS Foundation Trust will continue as though they were appointed to manage charitable assets for the NHS Foundation Trust.

24 March 2003

Annex

"Foundation" Style Hospitals in Spain

BACKGROUND

  There are several, slightly different models of hospital "foundation" currently operating in Spain. Essentially these can be broken down into two categories:

    —  Publicly owned, privately managed not-for-profit "foundations" (eg Alcorcon). The management company is appointed by a Hospital Board which comprises of representatives from the Regional Government, local town hall, trade unions, healthcare professionals and patient groups.

    —  Privately owned and managed, profit-making "foundations" under contract with the Regional Government to provide healthcare services for a defined population (eg Alzira).

  At present, none of the Spanish "foundation" hospitals were previously state-run institutions. In every case Spanish "foundations" are new hospital developments that have always been run at arms length from the state. So it is not the case that the above average performance of Spanish "foundations" is due to them being formed out of previously high-performing state-run hospitals.

ALCORCO«N HOSPITAL, MADRID

  Fundacio«n Hospital Alcorco«n, is a public Foundation created by lnsalud on the 18 December 1996. Fundacio«n Hospital Alcorco«n is based in Comunidad de Madrid, and was created from the beginning as a "foundation". The Alcorco«n Foundation is run as a public hospital, but it is managed by a private company. The company is not allowed to make profits from its running of the operation.

KEY FACTS AND FIGURES

    —  Fundacio«n Hospital Alcorco«n is offering health care to an approximated population of 220,000 people and for the specialities of Allergology and Nephrology it is providing its services to a community of around 400,000 patients.

    —  It has 566 beds, mostly in rooms of two beds.

    —  The average in-patent stay is 5.5 nights, compared to a national average of seven nights.

    —  Its average waiting time for an operation is 54 days, compared to around 60 days nationally.

ALZIRA HOSPITAL, VALENCIA

  Alzira is a public "foundation" hospital that is managed by a private sector consortium.

KEY FACTS AND FIGURES

    —  There are no waiting lists. There is an average 45 days between the consultant deciding the patient needs an operation and the actual operation. This is a 25% shorter waiting time than the Spanish average of 60 days.

    —  The average length of stay is 5.1 days, the lowest in Spain.

    —  Over half (51%) of the operations the hospital performs do not involve an overnight stay. How many people they send home the same day is one of the elements of doctors' performance related pay.

    —  95% of the users surveyed in Alzira Hospital last year were satisfied by the service offered, and would use Alzira Hospital again if needed.

    —  Greater efficiency: average costs per annum, per capital 62% of the average for other public hospitals in the Valencia province.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 7 May 2003